[spokepoker]

If it is able to properly detect, and there is a decay, then it could help divorce proceedings, in the least.
"It turns out you banged this many guys while married to him, this many during this month, that one just a week ago, since you violated the marriage contract, you get nothing."
If you know the slut signs, then sure you can watch out for yourself, what about everyone else? It's almost like this should be a high school class, like shop or home -ec.
Why in the first place do we need to look out for this? This simple ass shit is what mother's should be teaching their girls, fathers implying to their daughters.

[Windom Earle]

I wonder if DNA from pussy juice entering the knob hole (aka urinary tract) has the same impact for men?

Not to say men should hold themselves to the sexual standard of the "ideal woman", but rather if the same science is at play.

[Suits]

(12-04-2015 12:01 PM)SmoothAsSilk Wrote:  

Useless... if men had bowls in these stupid Western countries, they would force these bitches to take a polygraph...

By your logic, this man forced his wife to take a polygraph.

[Paracelsus]

(12-04-2015 06:21 PM)wi30 Wrote:  

I would phrase it as beating a lie detector. I'm not sure how they work exactly but I would assume staying calm and keeping your heart rate down would help.

It's not keeping your heart rate down that helps, because your body has physiological changes because of what you're hearing. Sociopaths beat polygraphs because their brains are wired differently. I have heard that putting pins in the soles of your shoes -- thus generating pain responses and throwing you off physiologically -- helps beat a lie detector because it can't get an accurate baseline.

[wi30]

Paracelsus, I've heard of that theory. After a little research it seems the trick is to "beat" the control questions, which is essentially disrupting the baseline. A pin in the shoe could definitely do that.

Regarding thoughtgypsy's theory: It certainly is interesting, but completely unfeasible. Trust me, all of us would love to take a cotton swab or blood sample from a broad and know how many dudes she's banged, blew, or made out with. Unfortunately the men of this century have to rely on their gut.

I personally don't buy the microchimerism theory unless applied to bearing sons. I view the whole "every man who has jizzed in vagina is now part of her DNA" as false until proven otherwise. Do sluts bear physical signs? Of course. But it's because of the party lifestyle that is associated with being a slut.

[Ambicatus]

(12-04-2015 09:11 AM)thoughtgypsy Wrote:  

What if there was a way to measure a woman's lifetime sexual partner count?

Then female scientists would come up with something like this for interpreting the results

[Dalaran1991]

This techniques already exist more or less for the elites when they need to test the legitimacy of their bloodline, so its entirely possible.

I think the thing with technology like this one is that it doesnt change the mentality of men, which is the root of the problem.

Men are extremely resilient and creative beings, unline women. If they actually want to know the sexual past of women, there would have been over a million way to do this, whether mainstream or underground.

The problem is, men prefer to be told the pretty lies. Why do you think services like hymen reconstruction services are so much more popular than paternal testing? And lets not forget that the people funding that shit at the start was men.

That and the fact that many men know they are dating a slut but they go with it anyway. So long as I still see betas wifing up single mothers I know that this is for naught.

The irony is that this technology would only benefit us redpill men, but we have much better methods and experience to know if a girl is a slut, rather than relying on a test (in Vietnam girls bribe or sleep with doctors to get a positive virgin test)