[MMX2010]

(09-23-2015 10:47 AM)TSC2295 Wrote:  

Paedophilia isn't an act - it's the state of being attracted to children. Child abuse is the crime.

Paedophiles are sick, many of them know that, which is why I believe they should be given some mental help and we should try to find some way of changing it (after reading some experiences, I believe that excessive porn consumption has a role to play).

If they follow through with their attraction and fiddle kids, though, they deserve everything they get.

I used to think this way, but now I know that the government / leftists / Marxists / SJW's will use pedophiles against us. So if the powers that be are NOT treating them like people, but as pawns, then why should you support your own demise?

Why not double down? As in, anyone who sympathizes with pedophiles must be a pedophile himself. Or some other trolling / shaming campaign?

[Phoenix]

(09-23-2015 12:09 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

Why not double down? As in, anyone who sympathizes with pedophiles must be a pedophile himself. Or some other trolling / shaming campaign?

Because what differentiates us from the Left is that we're sane and pro-life. If we behave as mental and as evil and destructive as they are then we lose our selling point.

We don't need to use irrational shaming when we already have the shaming word already: Leftist. If anything, it's more powerful because it's an all encompassing grouping word. They hysterically yell: racist, sexist, misogynist, xenophobe, transphobe, homophobe etc etc, all we need to do is retort: "leftist" with venom in our voice. That is the ridicule word the Right should rally around. We only need one.

This is why it's always frustrating to see people using slashes when trying to describe them, i.e. "cultural marxists / feminists / leftists / SJWs". There can be no unified front against them if we can't even settle on a single term for them. Marx was simply a source of leftist material, and an SJW is simply a more "active" leftist.

[TheWastelander]

Some guy was saying on Twitter that we should have a rational discussion about this shit with leftists. No, there is no middle ground on this. There should be no discussion and dialogue with the left on this matter. Discussion and dialogue are the first steps towards legitimizing this shit, because it lends credibility toward what they're saying. It's just as it was with homosexuality. Abject hatred, a passionate fiery mob rage, and implications that we will take this to the streets and force them to deal with real life consequences if they push it any further are necessary.

From the limited interaction I've had with people about this they're extremely angry about it, especially parents. The only ones who have really tried to defend it to me or equivocate are degenerate libertarians. Libertarianism is libertinism is degeneracy. They want heroin vending machines and child buggery if that's what the markets dictate, apparently.

This needs to be an issue we are in radical constant opposition to otherwise they will succeed in getting it normalized.

[odesseus]

[/quote]

They hysterically yell: racist, sexist, misogynist, xenophobe, transphobe, homophobe etc etc, all we need to do is retort: "leftist" with venom in our voice. That is the ridicule word the Right should rally around. We only need one.

This is why it's always frustrating to see people using slashes when trying to describe them, i.e. "cultural marxists / feminists / leftists / SJWs". There can be no unified front against them if we can't even settle on a single term for them. Marx was simply a source of leftist material, and an SJW is simply a more "active" leftist.
[/quote]

One of the reasons the left has so many identifiers for their opponents is to divide and segregate their opposition. It also lends a pseudo credence by having many individual, word salad labels to then have to refute. It also minimizes opposition having a single entity spread amongst the many created 'buckets' of different thought crimes.

While I agree that neo masculinity and the right requires key rallying points of opposition; clearly and precisely dissecting the left's arguments as misandrist, racist, Marxist, divisive, able-phobic, nepotistic (as in un-meritocratic) etc. is not a bad thing and allows dialogue and ideas on the right to flourish. It also opens the door for a revived debate around social sciences - perhaps the next frontier in gender studies is dissecting the inherent nepotism that is third wave feminism and other regressive, socially destructive movements.

Thoughts? Comments?

[odesseus]

They hysterically yell: racist, sexist, misogynist, xenophobe, transphobe, homophobe etc etc, all we need to do is retort: "leftist" with venom in our voice. That is the ridicule word the Right should rally around. We only need one.

This is why it's always frustrating to see people using slashes when trying to describe them, i.e. "cultural marxists / feminists / leftists / SJWs". There can be no unified front against them if we can't even settle on a single term for them. Marx was simply a source of leftist material, and an SJW is simply a more "active" leftist.
[/quote]

One of the reasons the left has so many identifiers for their opponents is to divide and segregate their opposition. It also lends a pseudo credence by having many individual, word salad labels to then have to refute. It also minimizes opposition having a single entity spread amongst the many created 'buckets' of different thought crimes.

While I agree that neo masculinity and the right requires key rallying points of opposition; clearly and precisely dissecting the left's arguments as misandrist, racist, Marxist, divisive, able-phobic, nepotistic (as in un-meritocratic) etc. is not a bad thing and allows dialogue and ideas on the right to flourish. It also opens the door for a revived debate around social sciences - perhaps the next frontier in gender studies is dissecting the inherent nepotism that is third wave feminism and other regressive, socially destructive movements.

Thoughts? Comments?
[/quote]

Pedophilia is a disgusting aberration that is harmful, shameful and should be stamped out. Re-education at a minimum upon identification of these monsters in our midst.

[Phoenix]

(09-23-2015 12:48 PM)TheWastelander Wrote:  

From the limited interaction I've had with people about this they're extremely angry about it, especially parents. The only ones who have really tried to defend it to me or equivocate are degenerate libertarians. Libertarianism is libertinism is degeneracy. They want heroin vending machines and child buggery if that's what the markets dictate, apparently.

Libertarianism is only degenerate at it's edges. Specifically on the nation/immigration question (some believe in no borders), constitutional questions (they think for some bizarre reason that anarchy is stable so long as everyone is enlightened), and family (subordination within etc). I've yet to hear a libertarian believe in things like a child being able to consent to pedophilia, but I suspect it's possible if they're suitably tunnel-visioned, stupid, and zealous.

(09-23-2015 12:56 PM)odesseus Wrote:  

Thoughts? Comments?

The Left don't really debate logically though, they debate with side-stepping and logical fallacies. Right-wingers often engage in heavy duty 'explanation' of things, often in defence, which never works. For this reason I think it is important not to enter into any of the rhetorical devices of the Left (e.g. misogynist/misandrist, racist, sexist etc) because they are simply more skilled at this type of divisive noise.

A better tactic is to 'zoom out', provide some explanations as to how the world works, but then frame the Leftist within that world (i.e. as being a force of degeneration and perpetuating conflict), and then to always end the exchange with attack and ridicule (specifically using the word "leftist").

(09-23-2015 01:04 PM)odesseus Wrote:  

Pedophilia is a disgusting aberration that is harmful, shameful and should be stamped out. Re-education at a minimum upon identification of these monsters in our midst.

I think it's just a mental disorder. I doubt it can be 're-educated' away any more than homosexuality can be. I think the current system of 'registries' is probably enough.

[la bodhisattva]

A lot of psychiatrists acknowledge that there is some form of off wiring in the brain that makes adults attracted to prepubescent children. There are even public support groups where these adults recognize that they have this disorder and fight to stem their urges.

Of course we all know how despicable child abuse is and society treats it appropriately. Provided the aggressor is a "creepy, straight man" and the victim is a girl. Good looking rich faggots have a better chance of being allowed to fuck a 12 year old boy. Our society has a sick tendency to embrace the Classical Greek practice of pederasty.

My question is, why are men held accountable for acting on an unnatural and disgusting urge that is medically recognized while homosexuality is glorified?

[AnonymousBosch]

During the normalisation process - a discussion we'll be told it's important for us to have - be sure to note how writers won't ask for the opinion of their victims. The focus will be on downplaying their crimes as not having a real-world impact. As such, if there's any pushback, expect forced-silencing:

Note this recent Neogaf thread on the article:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fiction

I'm sorry that the fact that I was continuously raped for ten years from age five is coloring my view on the plight of the poor pedophiles. I should have considered the feelings of the type of people that do that, not my own PTSD. Forget about that 1 in 5 statistic! Think of the poor pedos.

You know how everyone says I don't get angry here, I am pretty nice, and rational?

You have made me pretty fucking livid. If I get banned, then I get banned, for the first time ever, but seriously, YOU need to get some fucking perspective, and possibly some therapy.

How does the moderator respond, since Millennials are taught by common core that "Moral Truths doesn't [sic] real?"

Quote:

Fiction, your particular situation is absolutely unfortunate, and I'm sorry. Really, I mean that; I am sorry you had to go through that.

But perhaps precisely because of the intimate personal affect this has had on your life, you may be particularly incapable of discussing this topic objectively and rationally. Not because you're a bad person, just because it has had such a serious impact on your life.

and:

Quote:

I know and like Fiction, so would rather her not be banned.

She should have told him to check his fucking privilege.

The rule is clear: Ignore the real world damage of their actions on children, pedos are the marginalised. This is the classic SJW mindset that took over policing when they were infiltrated during the mid-80's flourishing of PC: the real victim of a crime is the person committing it due to societal marginalisation and we need to have to have compassion and sympathy for them.

This scofflaw attitude is why I've lived in communities only a few hours from the major cities where Police Stations are designed like prisons to protect the officers FROM the local population.

This mindset is so toxically-ingrained in policing and offender rehabilitation for decades now defence will be weak if the narrative becomes increasingly-sympathetic by the media.

It's already weak. As I mentioned in the past, my personal work experience where a Lesbian repeatedly-penetrated a two year old boy with a dildo, the focus by the police and psychology structures was on protecting the Lesbian and worrying about her rights. The birth mother and father both wanted her to be allowed no further access to the child, but these institutions were more concerned with the father's involvement in the family situation. 'Problematic' was used. The evil dyke still has legally-mandated, unsupervised access to the child against both birth parents wishes, but the birth mother is no longer allowed to share a residence with the father.

This is the progressive mindset. Do you really think a narcissistic leftist population that brags about killing a child inside them without shame or disgust is going to care about fucking children, since they only exist as objects to them?

[The Father]

One problem in modern society is that pedophilia is, in my view, misdiagnosed. Sleeping with a pre-pubescent boy or girl is of course pedophilia. But feminists have now defined any relationship where the man is more than 10 years older than the woman as "age-inappropriate" and therefore quasi-pedophilic. And the laws of most states severely punish sexual relationships between men over 18 and women under 18. But women of 16, 17 are menstruating, they went through puberty in some cases 4-5 years earlier...they are "women" in every way biology understands the term. The ancients routinely wed men of 31 or 32 to girls of 16. Even 100 years ago, many of your great - grandmothers gave birth at 16.

It is not the least bit unnatural for a man to crave a 16 or 17 year old female with the body contours of a woman. Yet I feel this, too, has been labeled "pedophilia". It isn't. I'm not saying every 16 year old is sexually mature, or that every one is psychologically mature enough to have sex or be a mother (most aren't). I'm just saying that a not insignificant portion of them have reached sexual maturity and it is perfectly normal male sexuality to desire them. Your penis doesn't know that she's 16 or that the laws of California prohibit you from seeing her naked. Your body just knows chemistry and a menstruating 16 year old is sending off pheromones that say "fuck me".

[TonySandos]

Milo and Mike have the formula correct. The only question is if this will be the time it sticks. Most pedophilia normalizing has been in lighter doses in the past. We were accustomed to minor assaults with the effect of a random scud missile. This time they've tried out a bomb to see if it changes things. As already mentioned, NAMBLA existed. Shocking affronts have come before that didn't manage to legalize pedophilia.

The most telling way to know if it made a permanent impact this time is to see if a lasting effect has been achieved months from now. If only marching the Salon article out for the purpose of slurring someone else with it is happening, it's essentially died. If months from now one happens to look into the depths of leftist and "moderate" thought chambers and see any credence on the subject being debated, fight for your lives. If any victimhood is granted, the game is lost from then on. You might as well go out into the world with pitchforks and torches in hand.

[Troutslayer]

Every day I am more convinced that leftism is an auto-immune disease of the soul. It completely prevents a persons natural defenses, morality, from acting properly against diseases of soul.
Will the infection reach an inflection point? Will there be some line survivor holding out I Am Legend style refusing to touch kids or cuck for immigrants? A metaphor that seems less and less allegorical each day.

[CRR]

Perhaps I'm being too optimistic, but I really hope this is just one article and then the subject will go away.

It's bizarre we live in a society where feelings are automatically justified and deserving of understanding and empathy.

Unless it involves men expressing interest in a physical attractive woman, that's sexist and misogynistic.

As I have mentioned before, if this is an elaborate trick that everyone is playing on me, feel free to let me know now. Because our culture keeps making less and less sense.

[FilipSRB]

(09-24-2015 02:58 AM)CRR Wrote:  

Perhaps I'm being too optimistic, but I really hope this is just one article and then the subject will go away.

It is not the first article of this kind. It won't go away. We've seen enough of the pattern to be able to recognize it.

[The Beast1]

(09-23-2015 11:40 PM)Troutslayer Wrote:  

Every day I am more convinced that leftism is an auto-immune disease of the soul. It completely prevents a persons natural defenses, morality, from acting properly against diseases of soul.
Will the infection reach an inflection point? Will there be some line survivor holding out I Am Legend style refusing to touch kids or cuck for immigrants? A metaphor that seems less and less allegorical each day.

There's a great parable in the bible about a fig tree that bore no fruit. Jesus came up to the tree and ended up destroying it. Why you ask? Because a tree that bears no fruit doesn't deserve to continue on. In short, it's saying that those who live on this earth without bearing the fruit of jesus' teaching and lessons will be destroyed when he returns.

He doesn't even need to set foot on this earth for us to see such a thing.
Leftism and by extension liberalism as a whole is a disease of the soul. Ever notice how churches that embrace a liberal ideology end up having their congregations die out? How about women that embrace feminism? They die out too by not having kids. Evolution at work people! Nature is dictating that these people are unfit to have their genes passed onto the next generation.

Lets move from a micro view to a macro one. Once the tress of a society get infected with this rot it destroys everything. History is rife with empires that have fallen prey to apathy and leftist thinking. They get destroyed.

[AnonymousBosch]

(09-24-2015 03:12 AM)FilipSRB Wrote:  

(09-24-2015 02:58 AM)CRR Wrote:  

Perhaps I'm being too optimistic, but I really hope this is just one article and then the subject will go away.

It is not the first article of this kind. It won't go away. We've seen enough of the pattern to be able to recognize it.

Exactly. Gawker's floated it. The Huffington Post has floated it. A few Australian Publications have floated it. I'd been noting that this seems to be an ongoing concern of progressives - a conversation they believe we 'should be having'.

Which is why I wrote this post back in June to deny accusations of a Slippery Slope, and laid out then the expected steps that MikeCF tweeted a superior, succinct version of yesterday:

thread-47941...pid1039772

When I did write all that, I then woke up the very next morning to one of articles on News.Com:

thread-47941...pid1040185

To quote myself:

Quote:

It certainly is unusual deliberate subversion in action just how much recent discussion of this is popping up in the mainstream media.

Ask yourself: where is this need 'to have a discussion' coming from? Is the treatment of pedos something any healthy person you know sits around wringing their hands over? Who stands to gain by pushing for destigmatisation disguised as 'discussion'? Parents? Victims?

A common phrasing in both the News.Com article and the Salon article is pairing 'pedophiles' with 'virtuous'. This is no accident. This is deliberate social programming in action.

[Troutslayer]

This is a direction that should be vigorously and if needed, violently opposed. Seeing the direction the western world has been going I am confident most people here have asked themselves at what point they would draw the line. This is mine. How do we conduct an aggressive campaign to thwart pedophile acceptance? Are there existing groups we can support? Do we need to self organize? Internet culture war is not my specialty, more adept at the regular type.

[RedPillUK]

(09-23-2015 12:29 PM)Phoenix Wrote:  

(09-23-2015 12:09 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

Why not double down? As in, anyone who sympathizes with pedophiles must be a pedophile himself. Or some other trolling / shaming campaign?

Because what differentiates us from the Left is that we're sane and pro-life. If we behave as mental and as evil and destructive as they are then we lose our selling point.

We don't need to use irrational shaming when we already have the shaming word already: Leftist. If anything, it's more powerful because it's an all encompassing grouping word. They hysterically yell: racist, sexist, misogynist, xenophobe, transphobe, homophobe etc etc, all we need to do is retort: "leftist" with venom in our voice. That is the ridicule word the Right should rally around. We only need one.

This is why it's always frustrating to see people using slashes when trying to describe them, i.e. "cultural marxists / feminists / leftists / SJWs". There can be no unified front against them if we can't even settle on a single term for them. Marx was simply a source of leftist material, and an SJW is simply a more "active" leftist.

Leftist? I see that word all the time online but I have never heard it spoken, as a term, it sounds and looks like a badly thought out, awkward Americanism (just adding -ist on to left, so it sounds like racist, really?).
I hear the older generation sometimes mention 'lefties' in England.

Either way, this word is a terrible insult, most lefties would just be confused why you are praising them. While one word to call them would be better, I don't think leftist is going to upset anyone. Does anyone here get upset about being called right wing? or to use the same retarded language, a 'rightist'?

I'm sure we can think of a better term for all them, something like communist, socialist, peadophilia supporters, etc

[Thoroughbred]

For most forms of degeneracy, I can entertain a civic an cultural pushback as a reasonable response, and perhaps certain applications of interpersonal rehabilitation where appropriate.

Not concerning the abuse of children, ever. They are societies future strength, or ultimate burden. What is the point of fighting for change if the next generation coming through pulls it back down into the gutter due to horrible, unthinkable, trauma sustained in the most fragile stages of their development?

There are people that want this state condoned, and facilitated.

If you are so rotten, and deplorable, that you would touch a child to serve a gratification of your own that it cannot begin to conceive, an act that will damage and destroy an element of it's wellbeing so crucial to it's functioning in any uncompromised way in society, in personal realtionships or with itself, whatsoever, I only really see one treatment:



There is no change.org petition for this shit.

[Guitarman]

Homosexuality should be de- normalised as homo and pedo phillia are connected. Normalisation of homophillia has inevitably led to the disgusting normalisation of pedophillia.

Gay marriage should be banned, then homo phillia should not be taught or promoted in schools as normal and the marches should be regulated and definitely homophiles should NEVER be allowed to adopt children.

I'm saying go back to when being gay was just legal but they had to be discrete about it.

[Thoroughbred]

^ Nice sentiment but it's just not possible. We're in this room now.

[Horus]

Here is a write up about a paper published by Steve Baldwin entitled “Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement."

Don't read it if your are prone to outbursts of anger.

Quote:

Child molestation and pedophilia occur far more commonly among homosexuals than among heterosexuals on a per capita basis, according to a new study.

“Overwhelming evidence supports the belief that homosexuality is a sexual deviancy often accompanied by disorders that have dire consequences for our culture,” wrote Steve Baldwin in, “Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement,” soon to be published by the Regent University Law Review.

Baldwin is the executive director of the Council for National Policy in Washington, D.C.

“It is difficult to convey the dark side of the homosexual culture without appearing harsh,” wrote Baldwin. “However, it is time to acknowledge that homosexual behavior threatens the foundation of Western civilization – the nuclear family.”

Though the homosexual community and much of the media scoff at such accusations, Baldwin – who chaired the California Assembly’s Education committee, where he fought against support for the homosexual agenda in the state’s public schools – says in his report that homosexual activists’ “efforts to target children both for their own sexual pleasure and to enlarge the homosexual movement” constitute an “unmistakable” attack on “the family unit.”

Baldwin’s research is substantiated in a recently completed body of work written by Dr. Judith Reisman, president of the Institute for Media Education and author of numerous authoritative books debunking sexual myths, including “Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences.”

In her thesis – also written for the Regent University Law Review – Reisman cited psychologist Eugene Abel, whose research found that homosexuals “sexually molest young boys with an incidence that is occurring from five times greater than the molestation of girls. …”

Abel also found that non-incarcerated “child molesters admitted from 23.4 to 281.7 acts per offender … whose targets were males.”

“The rate of homosexual versus heterosexual child sexual abuse is staggering,” said Reisman, who was the principal investigator for an $800,000 Justice Department grant studying child pornography and violence. “Abel’s data of 150.2 boys abused per male homosexual offender finds no equal (yet) in heterosexual violations of 19.8 girls.”

Jay Heavener, spokesman for PFLAG – Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays, counters that federal crime data refute claims that homosexuals molest children at higher rates than heterosexuals.

“According to data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), this claim is false,” he told WND by e-mail. “The gay and lesbian community calls into question any dubious research which flies in the face of our own experience.”

And Gary Schoener, a clinical psychologist who has been diagnosing and treating clergy abuse for 28 years, told Salon.com, “There are far more heterosexual cases than homosexual.”

In terms of sheer numbers, that may be true. But in terms of numbers of children abused per offender, homosexuals abuse with far greater frequency; and boys, research shows, are the much-preferred target.

Baldwin says evidence he examined disproves the assertion that child molestation is more prevalent among heterosexuals. Both he and Reisman found that media coverage of adult homosexual abuse of minors is also slanted.

“The National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association (NLGJA) recently boasted that although homosexuals are less than two percent of the population, three-fourths of the people who decide the content of the front page of the New York Times are homosexual,” Reisman wrote.

That one fact is especially noteworthy, experts point out, given the recent child sex scandals taking place within the American Catholic church.

A survey by WorldNetDaily of recent news reports found that rarely did the media describe priestly sexual abuse as “homosexual” or “gay” activity – even though the worst incidents involved male-to-male contact, and a spate of investigative reports has revealed that the Vatican is concerned about an upsurge of homosexuals in seminary schools throughout the world.

Gay press promotes sex with children

Baldwin says his research not only “confirms that homosexuals molest children at a rate vastly higher than heterosexuals,” but it found that “the mainstream homosexual culture” even “commonly promotes sex with children.”

“The editorial board of the leading pedophile academic journal, Paidika, is dominated by prominent homosexual scholars such as San Francisco State University professor John DeCecco, who happens to edit the Journal of Homosexuality,” Baldwin wrote.

During his research, he also found:

The Journal of Homosexuality recently published a special double-issue entitled, “Male Intergenerational Intimacy,” containing many articles portraying sex between men and minor boys as loving relationships. One article said parents should look upon the pedophile who loves their son “not as a rival or competitor, not as a theft of their property, but as a partner in the boy’s upbringing, someone to be welcomed into their home.”

In 1995 the homosexual magazine “Guide” said, “We can be proud that the gay movement has been home to the few voices who have had the courage to say out loud that children are naturally sexual” and “deserve the right to sexual expression with whoever they choose. …” The article went on to say: “Instead of fearing being labeled pedophiles, we must proudly proclaim that sex is good, including children’s sexuality … we must do it for the children’s sake.”

Larry Kramer, the founder of ACT-UP, a noted homosexual activist group, wrote in his book, “Report from the Holocaust: The Making of an AIDS Activist”: “In those instances where children do have sex with their homosexual elders, be they teachers or anyone else, I submit that often, very often, the child desires the activity, and perhaps even solicits it.”

In a study of advertisements in the influential homosexual newspaper, The Advocate, Reisman found ads for a “Penetrable Boy Doll … available in three provocative positions. She also found that the number of erotic boy images in each issue of The Advocate averaged 14.

Homosexual newspapers and travel publications advertise prominently for countries where boy prostitution is heavy, such as Burma, the Philippines, Sri Lanka and Thailand.

Homosexuality ‘youth-oriented’?

“Research on the homosexual lifestyle confirms it is almost exclusively a youth-oriented culture,” Baldwin wrote. “Very few gays exhibit preference for older men.”

“Some admit to focus on teenage boys,” he said, “some on prepubescent boys, and many cross over between categories.”

A 1988 study detailed in Baldwin’s report found that most pedophiles even consider themselves to be “gay.” According to the study, “Archives of Sexual Behavior,” some 86 percent of pedophiles described themselves as homosexual or bisexual. Also, the study found, the number of teenage male prostitutes who identify as homosexuals has risen from 10 percent to 60 percent in the past 15 years.

When asked what he thought about critics who attempt to debunk his research, Baldwin said the results speak for themselves.

“For them to say this theory is false is to call many of the homosexual movement’s leaders liars,” he said. “Most of my evidence comes right from the gay community.”

“I managed to find enough evidence that my thesis – child molestation is an integral part of the homosexual movement – is a valid thesis,” Baldwin told WorldNetDaily.

Other experts have also found a distinct pattern between child sex abusers and the incidence of homosexuality.

“How long can psychologists be in denial about the significance of the dark side, and ignore what it implies about the homosexual condition? And there’s a matter of even greater concern. How long will psychologists eagerly throw open the door to gay life for every sexually confused teenager?” writes Joseph Nicolosi, Ph.D, on behalf of NARTH – the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality – a group that says it exists to “provide psychological understanding of the cause, treatment and behavior patterns associated with homosexuality, within the boundaries of a civil public dialogue.”

The North American Man-Boy Love Association, or NAMBLA, is “a group that openly promotes sex with minor boys and claims that boy-lovers respond to the needs of the boys they love,” Baldwin said in his report.

The group is often endorsed by “many of the homosexual movement’s most prominent leaders,” he said.

Advocacy moving to schools

Promotion of the “gay and lesbian lifestyle” is increasing in the nation’s public schools.

A WND survey of homosexual-oriented websites found that almost every group has some sort of program to “educate” teachers, school administrators and other school employees about the homosexual lifestyle:

GLSEN – the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network – bills itself as “the largest national network of parents, students, educators and others” specifically formed to end “discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity/expression in K-12 schools. Two recent press released boasted of the Broward County (Fla.) school board approving GLSEN-sponsored “training for teachers.”

A student activist working with GLSEN officials has managed to “give voice” recently to “gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered students” at California schools;

PFLAG has created a national campaign called, “From Our House to the Schoolhouse,” distributing to school officials – among other materials – a booklet entitled, “Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation and Youth: A Primer For Principals, Educators, & School Personnel. [Editor's note: Readers need the Adobe PDF reader to open and read this file.]

Though most school-related programs are sold to administrators and parents as programs designed simply to end persecution of homosexuals and lesbians, none disclose what Baldwin says is compelling evidence that homosexuality is harmful to children.

“What … does the academic literature say about the relationship between homosexuality and child molestation? Quite a bit, actually,” he wrote, quoting data compiled by the Family Research Institute: “Scientific studies confirm a strong pedophilic predisposition among homosexuals.”

The institute, after reviewing more than 19 studies and peer-reviewed reports in a 1985 “Psychological Reports” article, found that homosexuals account for between 25 and 40 percent of all child molestation.

“But this number is low,” Baldwin says, “due to the fact that many reporters will not report if a child molester is a homosexual, even if he knows that to be the case.”

[Cr33pin]

[B TAHKE]

So, this just came down today from the US Military.. a couple guys discharged for "assaulting" an Afghani Paedofile caught in the act of raping a child.. http://allenbwest.com/2015/09/does-what-...-and-rape/

[uncledick]

If Pedophilia becomes normalized in the west, then I'm out. Nuke it, burn it down, Start a revolution and hang every fucker up who had any part of it's acceptance, or if it comes to it; let the Russians, Chinese or even muslims have control of the west.

In fact this is the one issue, above all the other insane progs policies, that would make me rather live in an Islamist society than a western one.

Pedophilia becomes acceptable, I'd take a one way ticket to Saudi no questions asked. Then I'd actively find ways to eradicate the west from my new desert home. Allah Ackbar

[Easy_C]

Fuck it. I think I speak for everyone here when I say that this is the final straw. This society has already passed the point where I'm actively working on an exit plan. This line get's crossed then I hit the fucking eject button plan or no.


At this point I think we need a full blown ideological purge and backlash against these people. It would be over quickly: