I posted this in the main thread but it got buried. I've been following threads here on the topic and have read some media reports, but I still have several questions regarding the migrant situation Hungary is facing. I'm hoping someone knowledgeable here can help me understand it more completely, specifically the train situation where there was a standoff between police and "refugees" who were refusing food/water:
1) Where are these people entering Hungary from? Is it Serbia? Are they all coming directly from Syria by land, by sea? Were they living/safe in Turkey and then decided to take a crack at entering the EU? Who is paying for their transportation?
I found some interesting quotes on refugees and their rights:
2a) Are these migrants being stopped at the border or are they being allowed to enter Hungary then kept in another location within the country? Did Hungary do anything illegal by not allowing them to continue to Germany for two days? Is the country within it's rights to hold migrants who are currently at camps?
2b) Does possessing a train ticket to Germany, who are accepting refugees, exempt these people from Hungarian border control, thus allowing them to enter the Schengen Area hassle-free?
I'm asking because the information out there can be used to argue both sides and I'm wondering which is correct in legal terms. On one hand it seems Hungary can process and refuse them if they don't meet refugee criteria. But on the other hand they are just a route country with Germany being the host, so perhaps it is up to Germany to process them? Also the question if they are coming in mass or not appears to play a factor as well.
Any answers and/or clarifications are much appreciated.
1) Where are these people entering Hungary from? Is it Serbia? Are they all coming directly from Syria by land, by sea? Were they living/safe in Turkey and then decided to take a crack at entering the EU? Who is paying for their transportation?
I found some interesting quotes on refugees and their rights:
Quote:Quote:
- "...during a mass exodus, it may not be possible for a host country to carry out individual screening. In such circumstances, particularly when civilians are fleeing for similar reasons, a 'group' determination of refugee status may be declared, whereby each civilian is considered a refugee, in the absence of evidence to the contrary."
- "International law recognizes the right to seek asylum, but does not oblige states to provide it."
- "...refugees should not be penalized for having entered a country illegally if they have come directly from a place where they were in danger and have made themselves known to the authorities."
http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/edumat/stud...fugees.htm
2a) Are these migrants being stopped at the border or are they being allowed to enter Hungary then kept in another location within the country? Did Hungary do anything illegal by not allowing them to continue to Germany for two days? Is the country within it's rights to hold migrants who are currently at camps?
2b) Does possessing a train ticket to Germany, who are accepting refugees, exempt these people from Hungarian border control, thus allowing them to enter the Schengen Area hassle-free?
I'm asking because the information out there can be used to argue both sides and I'm wondering which is correct in legal terms. On one hand it seems Hungary can process and refuse them if they don't meet refugee criteria. But on the other hand they are just a route country with Germany being the host, so perhaps it is up to Germany to process them? Also the question if they are coming in mass or not appears to play a factor as well.
Any answers and/or clarifications are much appreciated.