We aren't even scratching the surface here.
In my mind the debate between brown and white rice is more about thermic effects, glycemic index, etc. It has nothing to do with nutritional values.
Take this into account:
Quote:Quote:
Freshly harvested rice has a tough outer hull that must be removed to make the grain edible. The result is whole-grain brown rice. Whole grains consist of three different layers that each have different nutrients. To produce white rice, the grain is further processed to remove two more layers: the bran and germ. The bran and germ contain most of the grain’s fiber and about 50 to 80 percent of its minerals. This type of processed food is a “bad carb,” because it lacks fiber and has fewer nutrients. The term “good carb” refers to complex carbs that retain the natural fiber, vitamins and minerals.
I don't think I need to explain simple vs complex carbs too in depth on here. In simple terms your body burns more calories digesting brown rice than white because brown is a complex carb and has a higher thermic effect. There's one point in favor of brown rice.
Another reason brown rice is superior in my mind his because it has a lower glycemic index than white rice.
In my understanding foods that have a lower number take longer for for the body to convert from glycogen stores into fat stores, which is a good thing because it means your body has the opportunity to burn those calories before they are put into long term storage.
White rice has a higher number which means it converts into fat stores quickly if you don't burn it right away. Another point in favor of brown rice.
Brown and white rice both effect your blood sugar levels differently but I don't know anything about that.
I have a very rudimentary understanding of this, but it was explained to me in real science terms by a chemist that I trust. I used to eat nothing but white rice, but I converted after a few conversations with him. I also learned to tolerate the different taste.
I am Team Brown Rice all the way.