rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"
#1

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

"Welcome to Big Earl's
Where MEN act like MEN
And WOMEN act like LADIES"





*****
Blair Naso publishes on ROK every Thirsty Thursday. Send him mail, read his articles, and buy his literary anthology.
Reply
#2

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

Did some "funny" guy make a 7 minute sketch about a mans right to use his business how he see's fit? I like how the conformist masses love to ridicule others who don't want to see queers porking each other, its like they get off on the fact somebody is uncomfortable and disgusted.
Reply
#3

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

I think that anyone has the right to admittance in their own restaurant. It's not like they came in and were turned away because someone KNEW they were gay, it's because of the public displays of affection they made while they were there. So they weren't chucked out for being gay exactly.

The language was unprofessional, but business owners have rights.

The left's totalitarian streak becomes more obvious every day.

Quote: (03-05-2016 02:42 PM)SudoRoot Wrote:  
Fuck this shit, I peace out.
Reply
#4

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

I believe restaurant owners should have the right to refuse people based on race. Morally, they shouldn't do it, sure, but legally they should be allowed.

*****
Blair Naso publishes on ROK every Thirsty Thursday. Send him mail, read his articles, and buy his literary anthology.
Reply
#5

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

Quote: (02-08-2015 06:31 PM)blairnaso Wrote:  

I believe restaurant owners should have the right to refuse people based on race. Morally, they shouldn't do it, sure, but legally they should be allowed.
As a black guy, I agree. I'd hope they put a big sign out front too, advertising the fact. I'd rather they just come out and say they don't want black people there then do some surreptitious shit and run their balls in my food.
Reply
#6

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

Quote: (02-08-2015 06:36 PM)dads Wrote:  

Quote: (02-08-2015 06:31 PM)blairnaso Wrote:  

I believe restaurant owners should have the right to refuse people based on race. Morally, they shouldn't do it, sure, but legally they should be allowed.
As a black guy, I agree. I'd hope they put a big sign out front too, advertising the fact. I'd rather they just come out and say they don't want black people there then do some surreptitious shit and run their balls in my food.

If you stop to think about some of the completely vile shit that goes on in restaurants, you wouldn't eat out much, if at all.

“….and we will win, and you will win, and we will keep on winning, and eventually you will say… we can’t take all of this winning, …please Mr. Trump …and I will say, NO, we will win, and we will keep on winning”.

- President Donald J. Trump
Reply
#7

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

Quote: (02-08-2015 06:42 PM)YossariansRight Wrote:  

If you stop to think about some of the completely vile shit that goes on in restaurants, you wouldn't eat out much, if at all.

Understandable. I don't like eating at bars and restaurants too much because of the experience of working in one. Can't stand the fake niceness workers get for tips and then become the worst people in the world when the customers are not around. If I was a married man I'd stay away from them all together, and get my wife to stay in and cook (like my mother does; she hates eating out) and buy my beer from the liquor store.
Reply
#8

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

Let's be realistic. In 2015, if a restaurant had a sign that said "No Blacks Allowed", then they'd go out of business in a week. White people wouldn't eat there either.

*****
Blair Naso publishes on ROK every Thirsty Thursday. Send him mail, read his articles, and buy his literary anthology.
Reply
#9

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

One time working at Applebee's, I dropped my phone in the BBQ sauce. We didn't change the sauce, and nobody criticized me for touching my phone while making food without gloves.

*****
Blair Naso publishes on ROK every Thirsty Thursday. Send him mail, read his articles, and buy his literary anthology.
Reply
#10

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

Lol at ToshO:

"If you don't want to attract the gays don't name your restaurant Big Earl's"

haha
Reply
#11

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

Quote: (02-08-2015 06:31 PM)blairnaso Wrote:  

I believe restaurant owners should have the right to refuse people based on race. Morally, they shouldn't do it, sure, but legally they should be allowed.

This is a naive perspective, to put it mildly. By this logic (not an unpopular one), all sorts of things should be left to people's "morals." Go to NN's forum if you want to see what a Blair Naso Unregulated Paradise looks like. Just extrapolate that out to a societal level.

I'd say a comfortable majority of people need to be told what to do or not do--and then often made to do it. From using your blinkers when you switch lanes, to finishing your antibiotics so you don't create highly contagious drug-resistant strains of your stupid disease, to at least pretending to stomach all races in your restaurant in exchange for the privilege of doing business in our society, this is the shit that you have to keep going so that your kids and women (however insufferable and ungrateful as they've become) can walk around in a society that hasn't descended into a Mad Max-like state.

The threat of getting arrested by the cops, banned from a forum, or punished by the bearded man in the sky is often the only thing standing between you and Somalia. That's why I laugh at people who complain about the police wholesale. Yeah, some of them are power-trippin' cocksuckers who can't tell the difference between their jobs and Call of Duty anymore. But, until you've had to call the cops on a ghetto-ass bitch getting in your face or some Chinese restaurant owner who's pretending the hundy you gave him was a $20--and then watched how quickly the animal calms down or recovers its memory when it sees the man in uniform--you don't understand just how vital they are to keeping order without having to kick some ass constantly. The same goes for other forms of authority. Police alone won't keep the estrogen-producing chemicals out of your food.

The solution to the police state, that even tells you what to think, isn't its opposite: some laissez-faire free-for-all that sounds good in theory, but doesn't account for the realities of a large, modern society. What works for an unattended fruit stand on the side of the road, or the bowl of pennies at 7-11, doesn't work for a piece of creation spanning four time zones and with 325 millions souls.

Quote: (02-08-2015 07:25 PM)blairnaso Wrote:  

Let's be realistic. In 2015, if a restaurant had a sign that said "No Blacks Allowed", then they'd go out of business in a week. White people wouldn't eat there either.

The irony is that this is very detached from reality.

If you put it in the right place, it would get packed. Have you ever spent any kind of time in Eastern Washington or certain parts of Idaho or Montana? Frankly, I think it could be a profitable chain in several pockets, if it were made legal. At worst, you could serve a niche market and make a decent living.

Shit, there's bound to be at least one or two forum members who would pop in.

Tuthmosis Twitter | IRT Twitter
Reply
#12

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

I don't watch television or know what this show is. Is this real news or is it like some sort of satire or something.
Reply
#13

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

But if you think about it, the fact that whites would refuse to go to a no blacks restaurant is just the free market working as intended. And in the places where a no blacks restaurant would be popular, I'm guessing there aren't any blacks there in the first place. Hell, blacks and whites still self segregate in the south despite all the efforts to end official segregation policies.

Legislation doesn't really do anything in the first place, the government just takes credit for inventing civil rights after the fact. Social shaming is the only thing that works.
Reply
#14

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

Sure, it's all good until it turns out the only meat wholesaler in Big Earl's neck of the woods has a gay son and he then refuses to sell to Big Earl because of HIS moral principles. Bet it wouldn't take long for Earl to see how the Civil right Act makes a little bit of sense.
Reply
#15

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

Quote: (02-08-2015 06:31 PM)blairnaso Wrote:  

I believe restaurant owners should have the right to refuse people based on race. Morally, they shouldn't do it, sure, but legally they should be allowed.

Opinions such as the above make me grateful that Red Pill thinking will probably never go mainstream and not be reflected in legislation.

Quote: (08-18-2016 12:05 PM)dicknixon72 Wrote:  
...and nothing quite surprises me anymore. If I looked out my showroom window and saw a fully-nude woman force-fucking an alligator with a strap-on while snorting xanex on the roof of her rental car with her three children locked inside with the windows rolled up, I wouldn't be entirely amazed.
Reply
#16

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

Haha. Wow. I didn't realize it would be such a controversial statement on this forum. Just a philosoraptor musing.

I also believe restaurants should be allowed to have smoking sections.

What is the NN's forum? I haven't heard of that.

*****
Blair Naso publishes on ROK every Thirsty Thursday. Send him mail, read his articles, and buy his literary anthology.
Reply
#17

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

Gay marriage is a bunch of bullshit these weirdos use to sue people.

"Men willingly believe what they wish." - Julius Caesar, De Bello Gallico, Book III, Ch. 18
Reply
#18

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

My legal knowledge is fuzzy on this, but isn't it true that anti-discrimination laws are tied to interstate commerce? For example, if you're based in Texas and only serve people from Texas, you can (legally) discriminate?

The Feds often work benevolently through loopholes, for example, creating a drinking age of 21 by withholding Federal highway funding if the state has a lower age.
Reply
#19

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

Quote: (02-08-2015 11:38 PM)blairnaso Wrote:  

I also believe restaurants should be allowed to have smoking sections.

I do not understand this mentality that restaurants/bars cannot have smoking sections. In Canada we have recently lost the privilege to even smoke on sanctioned patios now; why can a restaurant/bar not choose to have smoking as a feature or not? Presumably if a restaurant/bar opted to allow smoking it would have to explicitly state so, but if not, then it remains unlabelled.

A humble gentleman's blog about pussy, cigars, and game.

LATEST POST:
The Problem With Nightclubs

Also check out my blog for cigar discussion and reviews.
Reply
#20

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

If that had happened in the Uk the owner would have been arrested and his business shut down by the media.
Reply
#21

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

Quote: (02-08-2015 11:05 PM)Goldin Boy Wrote:  

Quote: (02-08-2015 06:31 PM)blairnaso Wrote:  

I believe restaurant owners should have the right to refuse people based on race. Morally, they shouldn't do it, sure, but legally they should be allowed.

Opinions such as the above make me grateful that Red Pill thinking will probably never go mainstream and not be reflected in legislation.

"Red Pill thinking" is just looking at reality as it is. It's not tied to a particular ideology or policies. People can correctly perceive reality but disagree on policy. So tieing an opinion to Red Pill is an incorrect characterization of the Red Pill.

The effect of repealing anti-discrimination laws could not be completely foreseen. For example, it could lead to racial nationalists and other distinct groups concentrating in enclaves and excluding others.

Quote: (02-09-2015 01:39 AM)RouteBackwards Wrote:  

Quote: (02-08-2015 11:38 PM)blairnaso Wrote:  

I also believe restaurants should be allowed to have smoking sections.

I do not understand this mentality that restaurants/bars cannot have smoking sections. In Canada we have recently lost the privilege to even smoke on sanctioned patios now; why can a restaurant/bar not choose to have smoking as a feature or not? Presumably if a restaurant/bar opted to allow smoking it would have to explicitly state so, but if not, then it remains unlabelled.

Anti-smoking measures are legitimate as worker health measures. Smoking was banned on planes after flight crews showed elevated levels of respiratory problems. Same thing with bartenders. I have no problem with smoking on outside patios, but this is another issue where young people don't know what it was like before.

Clothes and body reeking of stale smoke smell after a transoceanic flight, even if you were in "non-smoking," or after half an hour in a bar.
Reply
#22

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

Quote: (02-08-2015 09:14 PM)BortimusPrime Wrote:  

Legislation doesn't really do anything in the first place, the government just takes credit for inventing civil rights after the fact. Social shaming is the only thing that works.
I agree the last step is social shaming but it takes a lot of legislation before that to educate the population as to the harmfulness of something.

For instance with cigarettes , here's my guess on how it went:

First some independent researchers figured out it gives you cancer, strokes, etc.
Then the tobacco company funds phony studies "disproving" the risk.
People defend their disgusting habit with denial "My grandfather lived to be 90 ... etc". They are too stupid to understand science.

THEN the gubmint funds studies where they actually want to find out the truth without bribes from Big Tobacco.
That of course has to be funded by legislation.

Then they find out , yes, indeed it fucks you up big time. They pass laws saying you have to put warning messages on cigarettes.
Gradually people stop smoking ( which is what happened) as they learn about how conclusive the research is.

THEN they find out second hand smoke fucks you up too, and now people actually want to be protected from the remaining smokers.
So they have to pass MORE laws to make restaurants non-smoking.

So , it does indeed take a lot of legislation sometimes to get people to do the smart thing.

And I know there are some smoking freedom advocates around, you're welcome to get some congressman to run on a "start smoking in restaurants again" platform.
Reply
#23

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

Having a smoking section indoors is like having a pissing section in a swimming pool.
Reply
#24

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

Quote: (02-09-2015 01:39 AM)RouteBackwards Wrote:  

Quote: (02-08-2015 11:38 PM)blairnaso Wrote:  

I also believe restaurants should be allowed to have smoking sections.

I do not understand this mentality that restaurants/bars cannot have smoking sections. In Canada we have recently lost the privilege to even smoke on sanctioned patios now; why can a restaurant/bar not choose to have smoking as a feature or not? Presumably if a restaurant/bar opted to allow smoking it would have to explicitly state so, but if not, then it remains unlabelled.

For me as a non-smoker, I don't want my health damaged by someone's cigarette smoke. Smokers, because their sense of smell is so damaged by breathing all that gunk in, don't realize how that smell and smoke creep around even closed doors. If there isn't a pretty airtight partition, with venting to the outside separate from the INWARD venting in the non-smoking area--if you're smoking , we're ALL smoking.
Reply
#25

Big Earl's an American Hero -- "We Don't Serve Fags In This Restaurant"

I guess this is a Texas thing. Really couldn't happen in most of the West without getting shutdown or fined
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)