[SlickyBoy]

In a recent post, mind numbingly depressing stats about the state of male to female ratios were posted. It seems like not just America and the Anglosphere are affected, but most of the inhabited world is in fact turning into a sausage fest.

As even a game neophyte knows that one of the worst things anyone can do to kill their chances is to approach the situation with a scarcity mentality. Yet in the pages referenced above, we quite clearly are living in a time of slim pickings, especially when adjusted for women of the greatest child bearing potential.

So it looks like those holding the scarcity mentality were right all along. Now, once this reality becomes common knowledge, what are the implications for game? Will guys become even more drawn to acting with a scarcity mentality? Will Americunts become even bigger Americunts?

[ThrustMaster]

Well I can tell you living in SillyCon Valley where the ratios are skewed 35% in the favor of females 5-6's behave like their cunts are made of cold-pressed-latinum, specifically younger ones that are not carrying extra weight.

I'm in good shape, pretty high on the earning scale, have better than average looks and am a leader in industry - I'm older than many here and while I do OK - when I spend time anywhere else in the country I can pull much higher quality with a fraction of the effort.

I can pull 6-7's with moderate effort here 8-9's elsewhere. So yes shit is fucked. Maybe I'm just a tired old man haha.

[Bacchus]

Depends where you are.

At the top:



For everyone else:



Forget income inequality. Pussy inequality is the 21st century's real issue.

[dog]

The implications for game is that it has become absolutely necessary for survival in the West. A man used to be able to bumble through relationships with some reasonable expectation of reproductive success. Good luck doing that these days unless you are in the top 5% in looks/fame/wealth... and even that won't save you.

And since it's becoming necessary for survival, I expect game knowledge to spread. The bottom 50% of men will probably check out, but the top 50% will have to learn game to some degree. And I don't expect it will have any positive impact on society as a whole besides giving women more hamster crack and raising expectations even further.

I fully expect that 10 years from now being a good looking dude with decent game won't be enough to reliably get you a decent girl and keep her in America, especially since girls keep getting fatter. The bar will be raised.

Roosh's "How to be a great man" summarizes this:
http://www.rooshv.com/how-to-be-a-great-man

[tallandblonde]

I think this is a little overblown. There have always been a few more males in the 20-30 year old range. Nothing really that statistically significant, but it's just how it happens in biology.

The thing that's changing is that it's becoming more acceptable for a woman to become a fat miserable cunt. But this point has been beaten to death on this forum.

I still think that if you workout, have good fashion, and most importantly have good game, you're putting yourself in front of the 95% of chumps that do none of those things, and will be in a good position to bang quality broads. There are also parts of the country where young women out populate the men. Manhattan being one of them (53 women for every 47 males). So if you live in a verifiable sausage fest, you can always move.

Just remember, a woman's SMV plummets after turning 30 or so, while for men you'll pretty much keep rising in value until 45 or so. Their place as a commodity in the sexual marketplace is very short lived.

[ThrustMaster]

Seriously, go stake out a coffee shop get a nice espresso (in a ceramic "for here cup") and a glass of water.

Get a notebook and take notes. Rate the first 100 women you see, in a WB/WNB unless you're a desperate sperg here in SillyCon Valley you might be looking at 6%-10% WB. Don't do this at 7am you'll get chicks headed to/from the box hahah and well crossfit chicks are, well going to raise the ante.