[DrewP]

(12-21-2014 05:58 PM)Mister X Wrote:  

But now, if I swipe 500 girls in the burbs, it's 500 swings and misses. I even installed a mass swiping app. After 1380 swipes, I had 0 matches. There's simply no other explanation. Especially given that, at a previous time, I was getting some matches here.

I don't know what it is or how to fix it, but whatever.

Don't mass swipe. I think Tinder puts you at the bottom of the pile for every girl if you do that.

(12-21-2014 09:34 PM)eradicator Wrote:  

These numbers are somewhat skewed. There is a lot of bad game out there on the online sites.

I've heard this logic before, but it's flawed. If you're willing say a huge chunk of the guys don't count because they run terrible game, then wouldn't a huge chunk of the women also not count because they're fat, ugly, stupid, nasty, unfeminine, just there to attention whore, etc.? In fact, the M:F ratio only among people who aren't complete dregs might be even worse than the overall ratio, as it seems to require a higher level of desperation for a woman to join OKCupid.

[N°6]

I re-opened my ¨PoF account recently. It is a completely different site than what it was. I used to get hundreds of messages if I ran the iMacro script on the Meet Me feature through Firefox. This time, I only got a few messages. The orthodox reply rate has collapsed too.

I used to subscribe on OKCupid which allowed me to use 'Hot' as a search criterion. I did this because I know that because of male competition, relatively less women and therefore increased selling power, most women will have inflated values. Even with the hot search option applied, a minority of the returned results are genuinely hot.

Having said all that, I think Tinder has peaked too.

[Matt3B]

Tinder is killing off other online dating sites, I agree.

It's also killing off more traditional ways of meeting girls, which is good for the daygamers. I've actually used "would you prefer I met you on tinder?" when daygaming as a tease when they say things like "this is so weird", etc.

[bacardi123]

the quality these days is tremendously shitty on "places" like okcupid, badoo, etc.

I agree OKC is a chubby-chasers's paradise while badoo and Tagged have literally more fake profiles than real ones (don't make me screenshot some of their "profiles" while in search mode).

A couple of years ago netlog and zorbia were quite good but they kinda faded and myspace wasn't that good but wasn't terrible either - however myspace is now officially dead.

In fact other than facebook can't think of any other website where you'd get anything over 5/10 that's not fake.

that's the siting experience these days...and yes tinder gained some ground.

[heavy]

Yes. Dating apps gives chics access to guys who look good but have zero game. So yes, the app turns into a validation tool.

I wrote about this under the Happn thread (new dating app):
http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-42825-...#pid907437

[DJ-Matt]

I've been fucking around with Tinder, OKC and POF for a year and still the notch count is at 0. I got maybe 2-3 dates out of it, and they were chicks I wasn't really interested in so it didn't go beyond the meetup.

I might just leave my tinder set at 30 miles so I can get all the hotties from the nearby college town, a 20 minute drive is worth some pussy. Even in my local town Tinder is way better than the OKC/POF trolls. OKC seems to have way more unfuckables.