[YossariansRight]

Quote:
”I don’t care how much money I get for The Hunger Games, I promise you, anybody given the choice of that kind of money..."

This slightly above average looking, photoshopped, airbrushed parrot, who reads whatever lines someone feeds her should be thrilled that she gets paid anything.

And yet, she makes her sex crime "statement" that she was violated by being topless (or nude):

   

Oh, and she's fucking Chris Martin, who is still technically married.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/art...geles.html

Yeah, what a role model...

[AnonymousBosch]

I think ROK should take a firm stand against the unwanted sexualisation of Jennifer Lawrence by clearly showing just how utterly-fucking-average this girl is in the looks department when stripped of a team of hairstylists, make-up artists, photographers and photoshoppists. Particularly notice how her real eyes are narrow and piggish compared to her glamour shots.

I pledge to never masturbate over Jennifer Lawrence, and if you can't find a hotter girl to stroke off over, I pity you.

"5 Reasons Why We At Return Of Kings Refuse To Sexualise Jennifer Lawrence."

1.



2.



3.



4.



5.



With makeup:





A mate of mine on 'The Fappening', when a mutual friend is asking him if he wants a copy of the photos: "None of the pictures are that dirty, and only one of the chicks is hot. [Jeter's anonymous blonde plate]." He passed.

[germanico]

(10-07-2014 01:46 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

The moral: when you shove sex down people's throats 24/7, don't be surprised if all they want is to see you as sexual. People didn't start this.

Well, people sure aint interested in her for her intellect, personality, or opinions. Shes just the mannequin of the month, to be replaced as soon as Mr. Hollywood wants a fresh piece of ass.

Quote:

I pledge to never masturbate over Jennifer Lawrence, and if you can't find a hotter girl to stroke off over, I pity you.

"5 Reasons Why We At Return Of Kings Refuse To Sexualise Jennifer Lawrence."

Actually, why would anyone? When any porn site has tons of freely available pics of hotter, willing, younger females of your particular preference or flavour? Why would I find this starlets grainy phone pics interesting when theres HD porn everywhere?

Of all the leaked pics in this particular fabricated scandal (I refuse to call it "The Fappening" as if it deserved its own name, like D-Day or 9-11) the only ones I found of any particular interest where the ones from the fake Arya Stark, that turned out to be from a cam girls Tumblr account and not exactly "leaked". All the other broads arent interesting with their clothes on, much less with the clothes of.

Quote:

The crime is theft and computer hacking.

Read the corresponding thread. They where not "hacked", not one of them. These where pics that they willingly sent and a member of a private ring that shared them decided to release them all into the wild. He probably was looking for his 15 minutes, but actually got nothing.

Quote:

The person you are when nobody's watching is the person you really are.
She was exposed not raped in any sense of the word.

[Paracelsus]

Quote:

It was long distance, and either your boyfriend is going to look at porn or he’s going to look at you'.”

Hang on a second, if it's a deep, serious, wonderful, enlightening, fulfilling relationship as MSM tells us it has to be, a true "meeting of two minds", or if your boyfriend is the white knight feminists keep telling us they want, then why are you competing with pornstars? Why do you even think you have to compete for attention? Could it be, perhaps, that your deep, serious, wonderful, enlightening, fulfilling relationship is a little more Red Pill than you're prepared to admit?

EDIT: In fact there might well have been some insecurity happening there. Check out the fronting she did regarding this boyfriend a few years ago--

Quote:

When asked if he spends much time on his appearance, Kentucky-native Jennifer tells the November issue: 'Oh, he really doesn’t care... like he'll sometimes wear these white tennis shoes with jeans, then tuck his pants into his socks.
'He has absolutely no idea how good-looking he is… I think a lot of women and men hate me because of that.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/art...z3FWGgq3Vs

[AnonymousBosch]

(10-07-2014 08:15 PM)germanico Wrote:  

Actually, why would anyone? When any porn site has tons of freely available pics of hotter, willing, younger females of your particular preference or flavour? Why would I find this starlets grainy phone pics interesting when theres HD porn everywhere?

Celebrity female beauty is vastly-overrated. There's two girls in my local pharmacy who are 8.5's, and the blonde in the bakery next door is a solid 9, in person, without photoshop. (Whoever was talking about cockblocking at the gym yesterday - you haven't experienced it until you've tried to run game in a busy pharmacy full of coughing, half-deaf geriatrics).

On top of that, there's an entire porn industry presenting beautiful women with their clothes off having sex, generally not talking about being an empowered feminist during the act, though I'm sure that exists for the guys who are into it.

The celebrities in question assume every man who saw their photos thought they were hot enough to jack off over. Lawrence is a six, and had a series of photos that I barely-registered for less than second each as I swiped past hoping to see a more attractive girl. It's hard to feel like I violated her privacy when she barely-entered my consciousness. Photos that were so meh I've long wiped the entire leak from my phone.

The girls at Gawker all enjoyed laughing at the Hulk Hogan video, and I doubt any of them flicked the bean over him, yet assume that because I'm a male, that I can't help but jack off over plain janes like Kate Upton and Lawrence - a girl so plain they have to keep artificially-lengthening her neck of on magazine covers.

Bitches, please. That would be like rubbing one out over the girls in the HR department. She even has the hair.

[Impulse]

(10-07-2014 10:21 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

The girls at Gawker all enjoyed laughing at the Hulk Hogan video.

Not to mention HuffPost's coverage of Greg Oden's(NBA Player) nudes which they posted and linked to. They'd followed up with another report linking to an article in which HE apologized for the leak.

I can only imagine how many parodies would exist by now if the leaked photos had been male actors. We'd be eternally showered with parodies and illogical justifications for refusing to comply, even when faced with legal action.

[runsonmagic]

It used to be you had to tell men that an all powerful god would punish them for lust to keep them from spending the money their children needed to eat on prostitutes that could kill them with venereal diseases.

But a lot of them still did it.

Now, people think they can stop men from clicking a link in the privacy of their own home... because women will be mad at them if they don't?

I've had women mad at me before. We'll be okay.

[BLarsen]

Oh lookey what I found in my Linkedin feed. What's the over/under until this gets taken down?

Quote:

Jennifer Lawrence - featured half-naked in the November issue of Vanity Fair complaining about naked photos of herself - is not alone in sending confusing signals. You and I and most people we know do it, too...

... By being honest about this, I risk having people accuse me of being misogynistic, unethical, irresponsible, unprofessional, untalented, out of ideas, and partially bald (unfortunately, that last point is true).

If someone outraged me by publishing naked photos of my body, I'm pretty certain my next move would NOT be to then pose semi-naked for a national magazine, especially with a cockatoo.

And it only took 4 or 5 comments to get what you expected...

Quote:

This is like saying that you don't understand the difference between consensual sex and rape. You really can't grasp this? I am disgusted by your ignorance.

[Praetor Lupus]

Of everyone who has ever stood up over this non-event of a story and said "By the gods, this will not stand. If you view any of those links, you are a voyeur, a carbuncle on the arse cheek of humankind", 98% will have glimpsed a photo papped without the subject's knowledge, of their cellulite, their baby fat or even something positive, and either thought nothing of it or started gossiping about it next to the copier.

This shit is in mainstream tabloids, in gossip magazines and because no one's called this 98% out on it, they feel justified in lecturing the rest of the world, who want to excise their natural curiosity in what these "celebrities'" naked bodies look like if nothing more.

I'm done with this unjustified hysteria.

[Swagger]

(10-07-2014 05:13 PM)YossariansRight Wrote:  

Quote:


And yet, she makes her sex crime "statement" that she was violated by being topless (or nude):
..

This guy made a similar case on LinkedIn (of all places)...Skip to the comment section for the 'outrage'

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/article/2...st-large_0


"Putting nudity aside (that seems to be your focus, which in and of itself speaks volumes), let's look at a different form of communication. You write for public consumption all of the time, so what's the big deal if I hack into your computer and post your private journal on a website, or better yet, your personal correspondence to a lover? I guess, if you get upset, it's only because you are trying to have undue control over your image as a writer. This is what you do for a living, so what difference is it if your writing was meant for public consumption or not? Whether it's nude photos, sexual language, provocative ideas expressed through photography to another person you choose, or simply silliness with a friend, it is a violation to hack, steal, copy any form of private communication and offer it for public consumption, regardless of profit motive."

[Dusty]

This broad is incredibly overrated in the looks department and very average. She's the Renee zellweger of our day.

[TornadoByProxy]

And you think Jennifer Lawrence didn't look at the leaked photos of the other women? You know, just to compare?

[Redwood]

To Jennifer Lawrence:

[TheWastelander]

(10-08-2014 03:47 PM)BLarsen Wrote:  

Oh lookey what I found in my Linkedin feed. What's the over/under until this gets taken down?

Quote:

Jennifer Lawrence - featured half-naked in the November issue of Vanity Fair complaining about naked photos of herself - is not alone in sending confusing signals. You and I and most people we know do it, too...

... By being honest about this, I risk having people accuse me of being misogynistic, unethical, irresponsible, unprofessional, untalented, out of ideas, and partially bald (unfortunately, that last point is true).

If someone outraged me by publishing naked photos of my body, I'm pretty certain my next move would NOT be to then pose semi-naked for a national magazine, especially with a cockatoo.

And it only took 4 or 5 comments to get what you expected...

Quote:

This is like saying that you don't understand the difference between consensual sex and rape. You really can't grasp this? I am disgusted by your ignorance.

So is LinkedIn the new Facebook? A friend of mine told me I needed to get on there, put my resume up there, etc. but I haven't yet since I loathe social media.

[TheSlayer]

(10-08-2014 04:54 PM)TornadoByProxy Wrote:  

And you think Jennifer Lawrence didn't look at the leaked photos of the other women? You know, just to compare?

Lawrence after checking out Emily Ratajkowski's pics:

[AnonymousBosch]

Nick Hogan's pictures leaked. Not sure who exactly he is.

Of course women took the moral high ground on principle and refused to look snarkily-crowed about him 'deserving it' because of how women were previously made to feel bad so he was 'fair game' and made fun of his dick size.

Reliable, petty, hypocritical women. Don't ever change.

[R Smoov]

So celebrities say they love their fans.

So why can't we see them nudes ho?

[Socrates]

I'm confused... if I look at this, is it rape? Or no.

[aSimpNamedBrokeback]

(02-06-2015 01:35 PM)Socrates Wrote:  

My Anaconda don't want none unless you got buns hun.

[Sanji]

Honestly, she has a nice butthole.

[Cr33pin]

[blck]

(02-06-2015 02:16 PM)Sanji Wrote:  

Honestly, she has a nice butthole.

If that kind of animal can get out of it, it's not a butthole anymore...

[Simeon_Strangelight]

Jennifer Lawrence's first big movie which tries to use her as the absolute main superstar is not doing so well:

Here a part of the movie supposedly one of the hottest scenes.

Even here they bring in the stupid feminist bullshit. No bitch - it is not about power. Most even very young very virile men could not perform when a room of men and women are watching them in a sterile environment. Hollywood and the religion of feminism preaches this constant feminist garbage of power and control, as if action like an uppity whore is such an incredible turn-off. Yes - it is somewhat of a turn-off when a woman acts like a man, but when she is attractive and spreads her legs on a table, then the majority of men would try to fuck that nastiness out of them. It's not about power, but about sex you crazy feminazis!

https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2018/03/red-s...-in-years/

And even the SJWs think that the sex scenes in the movies are lousy. They gave Jennifer Lawrence full control over nudity in the movie and all she did was to show "the power of feminism" by having a woman act like a cold fish and a male professional killer.

In reality the true sex spies would probably show even more warmth and laughter to make the possibility of being a spy far less likely. A girl who acts all happy, fun and feminine is far less likely to be a spy than a bitch who acts like a non-smiling male version of James Bond.

Quote:

Dominika spends the night at Nate's. She stays in his bed and he sleeps on the couch. Sometime during the night she approaches and mounts him, both fully clothed. The scene lasts about 10 seconds and consists of some awkward rocking that neither of them seem particularly into.

Zero chemistry. Zero sex appeal.

Don't get me wrong. Fully clothed sex can be sexy. This was not.

"I mount you fully clothed. You twitch your dick a few seconds. It's over. We are a couple, comrade."

Quote:

The only thing interesting about this scene (besides questioning why they bothered with it) was that Nate didn't seem to orgasm. It's good to show sexual interactions in a mainstream film where it isn't all about a guy achieving orgasm. That's an important conversation to be having.

Indeed - just stick it and out without anyone having an orgasm - that is true power.

I am sure that there are countless other memes there including constant browbeating of making the Russians even in the current day look like the evil empire, while the enriched Western countries are so woke and wonderful.

Another thing is the casting choice of this supposed seduction squad:



If you had to pick for seductive spies - wouldn't most of them be significantly taller than the women, knowing how this makes seducing a woman somewhat easier? Of course they could not have picked those men for the movie, or the women would look weaker and more feminine. In addition they seemed to have picked slim-shouldered men, because muscular ones would also make the women look "weaker" and we cannot have that living in the FEMINAZI-WONDERLAND.

[Paracelsus]

(03-10-2018 05:09 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

Another thing is the casting choice of this supposed seduction squad:

This looks a lot more like the casting call for stunt doubles for the Fifty Shades of Grey films. The women even all look as dull and boring as Dakota Johnson or whatever her fucking name was.

[CynicalContrarian]

Red Sparrow has a reported production budget of $69 million.

So far it's made $55mil worldwide. Not bad considering the lack of marketing, lack of glowing praise & lack of hype for this film.
However, even with limited marketing, it probably still needs to make $200 mil to even begin to break even. $180 mil if they're lucky.
After production & marketing, the cinemas still need to earn their fare share as well.
With Tomb Raider & Pacific Rim 2 opening in the next couple of weeks, fair to say Red Sparrow has a bit of competition.
All while it earns less & less each week.

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?pag...parrow.htm