[Glaucon]

(08-19-2014 12:07 AM)JWLZG Wrote:  

Wasn't there a quote from Jurassic Park III along the lines of: “Some of the worst things imaginable have been done with the best intentions.”?

I would not call killing 3 billion people "best intention".

Sometimes, I would like to have witch hunts back...in this specific case for example.

[infowarrior1]

(08-18-2014 09:48 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(08-18-2014 02:17 PM)xpatplayer Wrote:  

I've met several women over the last four years who've mentioned that rapists, molesters and men who watch child porn should be castrated. Some of them even feel that guys who watch regular porn should be castrated. Seems like a strange but growing belief among millennial feminists.

So much for women being 'fair, merciful and nurturing'.

"Some of them even feel that guys who watch regular porn should be castrated."

But wait. If you banned all porn, then regular women would become the porn by virtue of the fact that men are biologically programmed to see most women as sexual. Porn only makes explicit what's implicit.

In other words, when you don't have Playboy, Glamour magazine ascends to the throne of Playboy. If you don't have Glamour, you have pics of actresses from TV Guide. And so on.

What she's really calling for is the banning of male sexuality. Forget "transphobic" or "homophobic." These women are plain old sex-phobic when it comes to men's being allowed to assert any sexual agency.

American history for women can be summed up as: Puritans>Temperance>Nuns>Feminists>Hashtag Activists.

That said, if you killed off 90 percent of men, who'd pave the roads and fix the water heater? Also, where is the SPLC when it comes to this hatemonger?

Here is how they might manage without men.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU

Of course that will never happen and even if it did happen the ability of the species to adapt will be dramatically cut short:
http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/1999/08/the-a...women.html

[bojangles]

Of course she'll need men to actually help her accomplish anything

[Days of Broken Arrows]

(08-18-2014 10:44 PM)xpatplayer Wrote:  

(08-18-2014 09:48 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(08-18-2014 02:17 PM)xpatplayer Wrote:  

I've met several women over the last four years who've mentioned that rapists, molesters and men who watch child porn should be castrated. Some of them even feel that guys who watch regular porn should be castrated. Seems like a strange but growing belief among millennial feminists.

So much for women being 'fair, merciful and nurturing'.

"Some of them even feel that guys who watch regular porn should be castrated."

But wait. If you banned all porn, then regular women would become the porn by virtue of the fact that men are biologically programmed to see most women as sexual. Porn only makes explicit what's implicit.

In other words, when you don't have Playboy, Glamour magazine ascends to the throne of Playboy. If you don't have Glamour, you have pics of actresses from TV Guide. And so on.

What she's really calling for is the banning of male sexuality. Forget "transphobic" or "homophobic." These women are plain old sex-phobic when it comes to men's being allowed to assert any sexual agency.

American history for women can be summed up as: Puritans>Temperance>Nuns>Feminists>Hashtag Activists.

That said, if you killed off 90 percent of men, who'd pave the roads and fix the water heater? Also, where is the SPLC when it comes to this hatemonger?

I've noticed that a lot of your ideas are centered around the anti-sexual attitude girls have and that got me thinking.

The current Western education system caters solely to the female psyche. No attempt whatsoever is made to see it through a male psyche and as a result, young men feel ashamed of their sexuality and perpetually try to appease women.

Women, on the other hand, become entirely solipsistic and only view their perspectives and interests as natural. Matt Forney has written about this so I won't explain how any further.

What this creates is a culture where everyone views men as essentially useless and mere stepping stones for a woman's development.

The next stage is, as you have mentioned in many of your other posts, viewing sex as sinful and useless, in part due to religious and pseudo-religious doctrine and in part due to seeing men as wholly expendable. Even self-proclaimed sluts who attempt to have sex with as many men as possible count men as mere notches, not as mates.

Next, due to the overbearing power of lust and their ticking biological clocks, women will seek to mate through anonymous avenues. Say a friend of an acquaintance or through Tinder and online dating sites. Of course, the alphas will get 80% of all the pussy (and close to 100% of the good pussy) while betas are stuck with washed-out sluts and girls who want to 'settle'. All while viewing the man as a mere cock and money-thrower of course. Most demographics of America are in this stage.

The next stage will be chronic single-motherhood. Since these girls 'don't need a man', they will raise their children on their own while paying for everything. Many demographics of America are in this stage and soon enough, most of America will be.

Therefore, it is only logical that the next stage is this woman's idea of killing 45% of the human population. After all, it is merely logical that this should follow. This girl, as do many of her generation, view men as useless fertilizers who get violent and ignore the civilizations we have built.

Although her view is rather extreme, you will see milder derivatives of it being seriously considered. They will repackage castration as a positive thing for men and will geld most men, leaving only a few to breed with the females. Just like a chicken farm.

As for your comments on male sexuality, see what I have written earlier. These women cannot fathom male sexuality because all they have been taught is that it is a detriment to society.

Good points. I don't think any normal person would be so bold as to call for out-and-out gelding of the common man.

Instead, they're being more insidious about it. Which is more troubling. The media's constant promotion of sperm banks and women who conceive this way is already a way they're attempting to cut the average guy off from reproducing.

They're also underhanded when it comes to single mothers. The church and media now actively call for men to "man up" and raise the children of other men -- the ones single mothers chose to breed with.

Genetic screening will probably be the next frontier -- attempting to get women to buy first-rate sperm instead of using their average husband's.

As one of my American Studies professors used to say: keep an eye on the "light" entertainment (romantic comedies, sitcoms) because they're a good indicator of the larger messages being sent to people.

[civpro]

Strong manifestation of the 80/20... err, 90/10 rule.

[MrXY]

I'm not so sure she hates males and male sexuality at all

I see this ideology she has constructed as a politico-sexual fantasy that expresses her extreme contempt for beta males and desire to mate with a sort of superalpha who has been genetically engineered to meet all female requirements for the perfect mate.

It's the female mirror image of the juvenile male fantasy of having a harem of hot female sex slaves

[Sp5]

(08-19-2014 11:52 AM)civpro Wrote:  

Strong manifestation of the 80/20... err, 90/10 rule.

Correct. This is more interesting as a manifestation of how a woman despises any man below the alpha.

The internet has done this among many other things: it's given a voice and a community for all kinds of nutballs and perverts. There was a NYPD cop who recently had his conviction reversed. There was an online community of cannibals and he was writing about abducting, killing and eating a woman. The conviction was reversed, I think because there was no real evidence he really intended to do more than write about it.

(08-19-2014 12:07 AM)JWLZG Wrote:  

(08-18-2014 03:02 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  

I don't find this fucking funny.
This piece of shit is basically advocating mass murder and genocide (or "gendercide" if I can call it that). And she needs to be charged criminally with:

Terroristic threats
Criminal threats
Civil rights violations under the US Code

It's not a fucking joke, it's not cute, it's part of a mentality that we all knew would eventually lead to these kind of statements.

These people are inciting violence, and need to know where this will lead.

But she won't though; because she's got a vagina. She'd get away with actual mass murder if it were to come to that.

Nah, this is not prosecutable under US law. For something to be a criminal threat, the person making the threat has to have the real present intention and ability to carry it out. Watts v. U.S., 394 U.S. 705 (1969)

Same thing with incitement to violence - it has to be an immediate incitement with people having the ability to commit violence right now. Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969) is the case.

You can think that things like this nutball's fantasies should be prosecuted, but you're going down the European / Canadian road of prosecuting "hate speech" then.

I think shit like this isn't even sincere, it's just a big troll and whoring for notoriety, which in the USA is just as convertible to cash as glamor or achievement.

[Yano]

This is fodder that we can use to tip the scale.

[Brodiaga]

As a child, I spent some time on my grandparents' farm. The village where they lived kept all their cows in a herd, and people took turns shepherding them every day. Every season, they kept one or two largest bulls as "producers" and castrated the rest. I even watched my late grandfather castrate a bull, something I will never forget. Why did they do it? 2 reasons: meat tastes better if a bull is castrated; there is no point for smaller bulls to breed, because their offspring will also likely be smaller.

Sometimes it seems to me that feminists would like to do the same with us men.

[joseph80]

I actually interact somewhat with the Femitheist and strain to be friendly with her. I view her as a symptom of a much wider disease: the cultural misandry that's seeped so far into our cultural bones.