I was doing some idle thinking and pondering upon this age old question: Why to black women have big butts and why do white women have skinny bulimic-esque backsides?
Of course, it all comes down to the two races having differing genetic codes: white women have skinny-butt genes and black women have phat-ass-juicy-booty genes. But WHY is this so?
WHY did evolution choose to follow this exact path? Why did the Gods see it fit to bless the backside of the African children and forever curse that of the caucasian?
I think I have the answer to this question and it is infact a rather simple one.
Caucasian women come from Europe, a place with a relatively harsh climate and very bitter winters. This extreme cold environment necessitated the caucasian peoples of Europe to develop and to begin wearing clothing for warmth.
This was a great development as it helped the people survive in the icy hell of Europe but however clothing also had a negative aspect.
Clothing meant that women would have to cover up their bodies, the sign of their femininity which they used to attract a decent mate who could take care of her and her children.
But with their bodies covered up almost all the time by loose fitting clothing, white no longer needed curvy bodies and big backsides to express their femininity and to attract a mate because men could not even have a glimpse of those parts anymore.
Therefore, slowly; naturally and eventually, the big butt gene began to disappear and die out from generation to generation until it became as uncommon as it is today.
White women instead began to express their femininity and beauty through other forms such as through jewellery, long flowing radiant hair, multi-coloured eyes and symmetrical faces. This would also explain why White women (Slavic in particular) have arguably a greater percentage of pretty-faced women that other races where the majority of women may fall in the 5 and 6 zone.
So basically, the dawn of clothing meant the end of the white woman's butt. (Also that of the Indian, chinese and any other race or peoples that wore clothes)
African women on the other hand did NOT wear clothing. Before Europeans came to the continent their bodies were largely left uncovered for all to see (blame this on the warm and humid climates or just on a lack of innovation on their behalf, it doesn't really matter)
So since men are visual creatures, they would naturally choose mates from the women who had the curviest bodies and biggest backsides (because that was the most significant sign of femininity and fertility they saw) and so these women with their blessed backsides, who would undoubtedly reproduce more than their skinny black counterparts, passed down their big-ass genes from generation to generation until the gene became as common and widespread as it is today.
This largely applies to Latina women too (and by Latina I mean the women that have the genes of the native tribes of South America). Since the women of most of the native South American tribes wore little clothing, they continued to largely express their feminity and fertility through their bodies (and butts) which is why they have big backsides as well.
In conclusion I will leave a summary of this theory: the size of a woman's ass was determined ages ago by the climate, religion, innovative thinking or any other factor that led to the development of clothing or by any other factor which led their forefathers not developing clothing at all.
What are your thoughts on this?
Of course, it all comes down to the two races having differing genetic codes: white women have skinny-butt genes and black women have phat-ass-juicy-booty genes. But WHY is this so?
WHY did evolution choose to follow this exact path? Why did the Gods see it fit to bless the backside of the African children and forever curse that of the caucasian?
I think I have the answer to this question and it is infact a rather simple one.
Caucasian women come from Europe, a place with a relatively harsh climate and very bitter winters. This extreme cold environment necessitated the caucasian peoples of Europe to develop and to begin wearing clothing for warmth.
This was a great development as it helped the people survive in the icy hell of Europe but however clothing also had a negative aspect.
Clothing meant that women would have to cover up their bodies, the sign of their femininity which they used to attract a decent mate who could take care of her and her children.
But with their bodies covered up almost all the time by loose fitting clothing, white no longer needed curvy bodies and big backsides to express their femininity and to attract a mate because men could not even have a glimpse of those parts anymore.
Therefore, slowly; naturally and eventually, the big butt gene began to disappear and die out from generation to generation until it became as uncommon as it is today.
White women instead began to express their femininity and beauty through other forms such as through jewellery, long flowing radiant hair, multi-coloured eyes and symmetrical faces. This would also explain why White women (Slavic in particular) have arguably a greater percentage of pretty-faced women that other races where the majority of women may fall in the 5 and 6 zone.
So basically, the dawn of clothing meant the end of the white woman's butt. (Also that of the Indian, chinese and any other race or peoples that wore clothes)
African women on the other hand did NOT wear clothing. Before Europeans came to the continent their bodies were largely left uncovered for all to see (blame this on the warm and humid climates or just on a lack of innovation on their behalf, it doesn't really matter)
So since men are visual creatures, they would naturally choose mates from the women who had the curviest bodies and biggest backsides (because that was the most significant sign of femininity and fertility they saw) and so these women with their blessed backsides, who would undoubtedly reproduce more than their skinny black counterparts, passed down their big-ass genes from generation to generation until the gene became as common and widespread as it is today.
This largely applies to Latina women too (and by Latina I mean the women that have the genes of the native tribes of South America). Since the women of most of the native South American tribes wore little clothing, they continued to largely express their feminity and fertility through their bodies (and butts) which is why they have big backsides as well.
In conclusion I will leave a summary of this theory: the size of a woman's ass was determined ages ago by the climate, religion, innovative thinking or any other factor that led to the development of clothing or by any other factor which led their forefathers not developing clothing at all.
What are your thoughts on this?