[RockHard]

From the Weekly Standard, King of Fearmongers, an expose on the SPLC. SPLC has been earning consistent Fs from CharityWatch, due partly because of SPLC's habit of holding excess reserve funds (standard is supposed to be 3 years of operating expenses), but also to the relatively high amount of donor money spent on operations, particularly fundraising.

The article begins with the story of a gay activist who attempted to murder the staff of the Family Research Council.

Quote:

Of course, it was as ridiculous to blame the SPLC for Corkins’s rampage as it had been to blame Palin for Loughner’s. Still, there was a delicious irony to savor: The “anti-hate” SPLC had unwittingly revved up someone who carried out an act that was unequivocally a hate crime: a potentially murderous vendetta against a group of people predicated solely on the religious and political views that they happened to hold.

This quote got me thinking of an analogy: SPLC (and many other activist organizations all over the political spectrum) is like a Mafia Don: he tells his boys that "Mr. X needs to be taught a lesson". A few days later, Mr X get a beatdown or ends up shot to death. The Don never gave a direct order, but he just looked around the table and one of his guys decided to do the Don a favor. Seems to me that's what's happening with the SPLC, attempting to incite hate crimes while not actually telling anyone to commit them.

[HawkWrites]

Thankfully the FBI no longer trusts these idiots to give them any kind of useful information or assistance. Unfortunately it took this long.

-Hawk

[Truth Teller]

The SPLC is a left-wing hate group, just like how the Klan was/is a right-wing hate group.

[boycottamericanwomen]

I think it comes down to envy. Liberal men, aka betas, are very jealous of conservative, aka alpha, men, because subconsciously they do understand that women are attracted to masculine qualities and they also realize that by promoting liberalism, they are feminizing themselves. There was some study done that showed that the average conservative man was more muscular than the average liberal man. Think Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Just weak men envious of stronger men. That's all it comes down to.

[It_is_my_time]

(06-08-2014 10:30 PM)boycottamericanwomen Wrote:  

I think it comes down to envy. Liberal men, aka betas, are very jealous of conservative, aka alpha, men, because subconsciously they do understand that women are attracted to masculine qualities and they also realize that by promoting liberalism, they are feminizing themselves. There was some study done that showed that the average conservative man was more muscular than the average liberal man. Think Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Just weak men envious of stronger men. That's all it comes down to.

Yes. If you just observe who is a big govt. liberal v. who is either conservative or a small govt. libertarian, it seems to be often the weakest men and the ugliest of women who are liberal. They are jealous/insecure of the more successful people and want govt. to even things up in one way or another.

[boycottamericanwomen]

(06-09-2014 05:03 AM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

(06-08-2014 10:30 PM)boycottamericanwomen Wrote:  

I think it comes down to envy. Liberal men, aka betas, are very jealous of conservative, aka alpha, men, because subconsciously they do understand that women are attracted to masculine qualities and they also realize that by promoting liberalism, they are feminizing themselves. There was some study done that showed that the average conservative man was more muscular than the average liberal man. Think Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Just weak men envious of stronger men. That's all it comes down to.

Yes. If you just observe who is a big govt. liberal v. who is either conservative or a small govt. libertarian, it seems to be often the weakest men and the ugliest of women who are liberal. They are jealous/insecure of the more successful people and want govt. to even things up in one way or another.

The more socialism and welfare that the evolutionary failures that call themselves liberals vote for, the faster they accelerate our decline into an Idiocracy type of society.

Although in the Idiocracy movie, they still had things like houses, electricity, running water, and so on. But in reality, once society begins to approach that level of stupidity, there will be no intelligent people left to be the engineers, electricians, and technicians that keep society functioning. If the Idiocracy movie was truly accurate, people would have been living in mud huts and eating rats.

So that is what I mean when I say weak men (liberals) and women are destroying civilization. They are bringing us back to the stone age.

[It_is_my_time]

(06-09-2014 11:36 AM)boycottamericanwomen Wrote:  

(06-09-2014 05:03 AM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

(06-08-2014 10:30 PM)boycottamericanwomen Wrote:  

I think it comes down to envy. Liberal men, aka betas, are very jealous of conservative, aka alpha, men, because subconsciously they do understand that women are attracted to masculine qualities and they also realize that by promoting liberalism, they are feminizing themselves. There was some study done that showed that the average conservative man was more muscular than the average liberal man. Think Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Just weak men envious of stronger men. That's all it comes down to.

Yes. If you just observe who is a big govt. liberal v. who is either conservative or a small govt. libertarian, it seems to be often the weakest men and the ugliest of women who are liberal. They are jealous/insecure of the more successful people and want govt. to even things up in one way or another.

The more socialism and welfare that the evolutionary failures that call themselves liberals vote for, the faster they accelerate our decline into an Idiocracy type of society.

Although in the Idiocracy movie, they still had things like houses, electricity, running water, and so on. But in reality, once society begins to approach that level of stupidity, there will be no intelligent people left to be the engineers, electricians, and technicians that keep society functioning. If the Idiocracy movie was truly accurate, people would have been living in mud huts and eating rats.

So that is what I mean when I say weak men (liberals) and women are destroying civilization. They are bringing us back to the stone age.

I agree with you.

Look at the communist countries around the world. Their living conditions are beyond horrible.

I remember reading some where that one of the Soviet Unions greatest advantages to stopping the Germans wasn't their great army or their horrible winter. Obviously both helped. But their greatest advantage was their terrible infrastructure and roads. The German advanced was greatly slowed down due to the Soviet's roads being a complete disaster.

That is where the USA is heading right now, about 20 years behind Europe on pace to implode.