[rangman2000]

http://womenagainstfeminism.tumblr.com/p...i-feminism

Quote:

Equal Rights exist, right now: Feminists are the only people who lose their minds with rage when you tell them that women already have the same exact rights as men. That’s not good enough. They want more. They desperately want to be victims. They want a privileged social position.

Censorship: Feminism is about censorship. Feminists are the most vocal promoters of censorship of First Amendment Rights, hands down. Just look at how they react to Facebook comments, Twitter speech, and here on Tumblr. They also promote censorship campaigns against opinions in the media, on blogs, and on YouTube. They promote inequality of speech.

Helpless Victim Cult: Feminism promotes the idea that women are fragile damsels-in-distress who must be rescued by an external entity (the state/patriarchy) in order to be protected from having their feelings hurt by words that they disagree with. Feminism encourages women to think in terms of weakness.

Inequality: Contrary to what it claims with a dictionary definition, Feminism is not about equality in practice. Did you hear that part?… in practice. Based on its overall actions, it is about socially engineering society to give special privileges to women and special punishments to men. That’s not equality. That’s not respecting genders. Once again, I don’t give a crap about your dictionary definition. It’s the actions that turned me against feminism. The actions don’t match the rhetoric.

Discriminatory: The very name “feminism” is discriminatory. The “fem” refers specifically to women. It can never refer to men. To say that only through women can equal rights be claimed is like saying that only through black people can people have rights.

Patriarchy Fantasy: There is no “Patriarchy” because a real patriarchy would not allow women to vote, divorce, go to college, have a career, live single, get abortions, etc. If this is a patriarchy, then it’s a pathetic patriarchy and attacking it is like attacking a little boy as if he were a man.

Gender Roles…only for men: Feminists claim to be against gender roles, but I see feminists doing nothing about men’s gender roles when it comes to working the hardest, most dangerous jobs in society. They seem perfectly okay with men being the majority of the homeless on the street. They don’t want to look at the bottom of society where they will find lots of men (along with women), thus ruining their “patriarchy” fantasy and their claims to victimhood (and stuff for free).

Equal Pay is here… but it’s your choice: The “equal pay” claim is bogus and has been debunked. Any “average” differences in pay can be shown to come down to different choices in careers that have different earnings. The easiest way for women to “narrow the pay gap” is to train for engineering, computer science, and science-based career fields (the highest paying careers around). But they would rather complain. In fact, new research shows women are out-earning men in cities.

Elitism: Feminists are elitists. They are preoccupied with elite men: CEOs, millionaires, Senators, etc. But the majority of men will never have elite status. So, feminists are out of touch with the daily reality of the vast majority of men.

Hypocrites: Feminists preach against slut-shaming only to march in the streets calling themselves sluts. They scream against “objectification” but then objectify men for their abs, looks, money, and status. They claim to be for equal rights, but they only advocate for one gender. They claim to be for “choice” but they are constantly policing other women and telling what is “okay for women to do”.

Policing other women: A lot of feminists seem to think they have been appointed the Women Police who can then go around shaming other women for the things that are “not okay”. Makeup, shaving, wearing pink, and more are all “crimes against feminism” and punishable by social attacks. Nearly every online feminist seems to be a petty dictator marching around and telling women what “true feminism” is.

Rape Culture-Fantasy: Since Feminism is all about playing the persecuted, weak, helpless victim, feminists have promoted the fantasy that we live a culture that “teaches men to rape”. But nowhere is rape taught as acceptable.Rape is illegal and is seen as a crime by most people in society. Feminists confuse dominance and submission themes as rape. Only rape is rape. Posing in a picture for perfume is not rape.

Inflated Rape Statistics: Feminists love to “cite” that “1-in-4 women are raped” during her lifetime. This is a misreading of the statistic. The real statistic is that “1-in-4 women claims sexual assault”, which can mean anything a women wants it to mean when she reports it. It can mean rape, touching, kissing, groping, or even lewd comments. “Sexual assault” can be a very broad category. But feminists only select the most shocking aspect (rape) and then claim that is the definition.

Abortion as “empowerment”: This opinion is unpopular, but I don’t agree that I need to have my baby scraped out of my uterus in order to feel empowered. But the abortion industry (i.e. Planned Parenthood) makes a ton of money off this perversion of empowerment. “Abortion as empowerment” teaches women to see their wombs as nothing but garbage bins full of disposable waste.

Also, it's not only blogs. The Telegraph (a highly respected newspaper in the UK) has started a modest fightback:

Modern feminism has got it wrong about men
Why is it only women who see sexism everywhere?

[Foolsgo1d]

Best weapon against another woman apart from ignorance is...another woman.

[Constitution45]

Have to be careful though, a lot of women still adhere and embrace feminist ideals, despite claiming not to be. Only the man haters and stupid ones will openly declare they are a feminist in front of you.

[soup]

Guys nevermind what she says.

The real question: WYB?

[Mormon Nailer]

I appreciate these signs and some of these bloggers, but it's mostly bullshit: how many of these women would willingly give up all the government-mandated perks and the gargantuan advantages during divorce they get? Men have willingly given up their freedoms during the 60's to give women more (stupidly). Women would never do this.

[Foolsgo1d]

(05-28-2014 04:34 PM)Mormon Nailer Wrote:  

I appreciate these signs and some of these bloggers, but it's mostly bullshit: how many of these women would willingly give up all the government-mandated perks and the gargantuan advantages during divorce they get? Men have willingly given up their freedoms during the 60's to give women more (stupidly). Women would never do this.

I would think its a matter of "do this or else" with men. Men can be threatened with the full weight of the physical arm of the state.

Perfect example for this is golf courses and gentlemen only clubs. Threatened with their licenses being revoked and fines imposed they had no alternative.

No man with a semblance of intelligence would sign away freedoms unless he is lied to or threatened.

[Nonpareil]

(05-28-2014 04:27 PM)soup Wrote:  

Guys nevermind what she says.

The real question: WYB?

Indubitably.

...but nonetheless I am wary of the message. They can preach all they want against it, but at least historically, not many groups have been too keen on giving up all of their perks and benefits.

[Mage]

I will believe in NAWALT when they sign a petition to remove their rights to vote. Not sooner.

And I know it's not going to happen.

I only hope someone becomes an overt dictator soon and ends this election charade.

Then after a few decades or centuries when dictatorship will be overthrown and a male only voting system will be reconstituted.

Until the life becomes so good that women become idle and ask for more rights...

So it probably goes around in infinity if we don't blast ourselves to oblivion.

[runsonmagic]

Guys, you're all missing the point.

...WB.

[Basil Ransom]

This is still feminism i.e. sexual equality, count me out.

[JoyStick]

[soup]

If she's really red pill, she will at least show us some tit as an olive branch.

[Jackreacher]

There is some underhanded blurring of the message but the real matter at hand is clear.

WB

[kaotic]

I like her, but actions speak louder than words, I'm very weary.

WB

[Teedub]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-28464529

Presented without any leftist bias, which is very rare on the BBC. This shit is getting pretty big. I love how the Buzzfeeds, HuffPo etc of this world are going insane and resorting to shaming these women. Saying they "don't understand feminism".

They understand the dictionary definition, but they also see modern feminism's actions.

[ghostdog]

Writing some anti-feminism message on a piece of paper is an easy way to get attention. It makes the girl look like wifey material and intelligent, although it's not really that hard to criticize feminism. The women who are most against feminism are the ones who are the least involved in politics. They're just living their lives, taking care of their kids, husbands and communities. Those are the only ones who get my respect.

[Teedub]

She cannot help but admire his unshakable opinion:

[The Reactionary Tree]

http://alphagameplan.blogspot.com/2014/0...otice.html

Quote:

Women who openly oppose feminism tend to be more attractive than feminists. One wouldn't need the signs to know which is which.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

(07-25-2014 08:30 AM)ghostdog Wrote:  

Writing some anti-feminism message on a piece of paper is an easy way to get attention. It makes the girl look like wifey material and intelligent, although it's not really that hard to criticize feminism. The women who are most against feminism are the ones who are the least involved in politics. They're just living their lives, taking care of their kids, husbands and communities. Those are the only ones who get my respect.

True.

But an even easier way for women to get attention is to whine and call something "rapey," make baseless claims about "rape culture," or drone on about slut shaming ("Don't shame her because of the way she's dressed, teach boys not to objectify women!").

There's a subset of women who are drawn to politics and feel the need to speak out. Women Against Feminists provides a point-of-view for such politically-inclined women -- specifically the ones who might not like feminism, but may not have articulated exactly why.

Let's not forget that girls' minds are marinated in the poisonous stew of feminism virtually everywhere today. It's in schools. Books. TV. Commercials. Movies. Pop songs. Even children's shows and cartoons.

Women Against Feminism provides one of the few dissenting voices in mainstream culture that women to latch onto. If it keeps even a few women from swallowing the Jezebel/HuffPost/Salon party line, it's something worth supporting.

Addendum: there's one more reason to support this. WB.

[Truth Teller]

(07-25-2014 05:32 PM)Teedub Wrote:  

She cannot help but admire his unshakable opinion:

I (clearly) don't agree with Hitchens on religion, but I do agree with him on this.

[Messer]

OK, so finally feminists hit back on #WomenAgainstFeminism and hit really hard with armoury that they have in abundance #ConfusedCatsAgainstFeminism
http://confusedcatsagainstfeminism.tumblr.com/



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/28...&ir=Comedy

[iamdegaussed]

^more proof that women aren't funny

[Tytalus]

I think the silver lining here is that these anti feminists are actually attractive - and make a good point to convert other women into looking nicer just by definition of not being a feminist.

[Sombro]

Quote:

When she, and her generation of feminists, could exercise sexual power directly ... it was all “you go, girl!” Now that they’re getting past that age, they’re falling back on the standard refuge of older women: Slut-shaming younger women who try to do the same. Older women have, of course, always tried to limit the sexual power of younger women, for fairly obvious reasons. This is just more of the same.

Good luck with that, Nina. Meanwhile, the vast majority of women, according to a Huffington Post poll, don’t consider themselves feminists — and only six percent consider themselves “strong feminists.” So outside the fem-journalist bubble, these women aren’t the outliers. You are.

http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/192629/

[Akula]

(08-01-2014 01:06 AM)Sombro Wrote:  

Quote:

When she, and her generation of feminists, could exercise sexual power directly ... it was all “you go, girl!” Now that they’re getting past that age, they’re falling back on the standard refuge of older women: Slut-shaming younger women who try to do the same. Older women have, of course, always tried to limit the sexual power of younger women, for fairly obvious reasons. This is just more of the same.

Good luck with that, Nina. Meanwhile, the vast majority of women, according to a Huffington Post poll, don’t consider themselves feminists — and only six percent consider themselves “strong feminists.” So outside the fem-journalist bubble, these women aren’t the outliers. You are.

http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/192629/

great pic that should be one of our forum memes!