Quote: (05-12-2014 09:14 PM)porscheguy Wrote:
I know the US, Israel and Britain support the radical religious extremists in Syria and for the life of me, I can't figure out why.
Well, I can explain why the US, Britain, and Israel support the radical Islamist lunatics. Seems counter-intuitive, doesn't it?
Well, think again. You need to start thinking on another level, like the intelligence agencies do. This is all about power politics. There are several parallel threads of interest going on here:
Thread 1: Israel
Israel controls US foreign policy in the region, more or less, since the late 1980s. The goal of this policy is to ensure that no neighbor (or combination of neighbors) of Israel gets enough power to project power in the region. Hence, Israeli policy is all about destabilizing every Arab country in the region.
It is in Israel's interest to see chaos and weakness in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and Egypt. They even love to see chaos in Sudan.
Turkey is a client state of the US and Israel. The followed orders like the good little lapdogs they are. And it got them nowhere. Erdogan is an arrogant puppy, who thinks he can treat Syria like his own private Ottoman fiefdom.
America is a lying, arrogant nest of hypocrites. They have been funding, supporting, and arming these Islamist savages from the beginning. They have CIA outposts in Jordan and on the Turkish border. And all the while, their diplomats lecture us on peace and stability.
Thread 2: Fear of Iranian power and alliances
Saudi Arabia is a brutal, reactionary client state of the US and the West. It is also a devoutly Sunni conservative country. It sees the secular, Alawite regime in Damascus allied with Iran, and it gets very, very nervous. Especially since Iranian power is growing in the region.
If Saudi Arabia and its Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) regimes (Qatar, UAE, Kuwait, etc) can split off Syria from Iran by deposing the Baathist regime in Syria, so much the better. They don't care if they support radical reactionaries. Those Islamist maniacs are being used as a battering ram to take down the regime. Saudi Arabia has Syrian blood on its hands.
Thread 3: Religious bigotry
Saudi Arabia, as I've said, is a reactionary, religiously chauvinistic regime. It regards Shia Muslims (in Lebanon, Syria and Iran) as heretics. Saudi and Egyptian Sunni preachers were stirring up radicals around the world and trying to drop them into Syria to cause mayhem and murder.
So, in sum, it's the old game of power politics all over again.
The US and Israel thought they could use the Arab Spring demonstrations in 2011 to effect "regime change" in Syria and put a flunky regime on the throne in Damascus. A regime like the one in Jordan. One that would endorse Israel's theft of Arab lands. One that would turn a blind eye to Israeli and US imperialist domination of the region.
Because that's what they want: flunkies and stooges that say "Yes sir" to Washington and Tel Aviv. Anyone who stands up to them, or opposes their policies, is a "rogue" state. You know the drill.
What they didn't count on was the resourcefulness, patience, and adroit actions of Iran, Russia, and Syria. Asad hesitated for a while in the beginning, but the Iranians saved him, fortunately.
I'm not saying Asad is an ideal leader. In fact, I think he needs to step down at some point in the future. But an Islamist victory in Syria is for me unthinkable. They would ethnically cleanse out all the Christians and Alawites, and ruin the country.