[speakeasy]

Feminist explains how to anger them. "Nice guys" are now on the feminist shit list. She also draws the connection between fat shaming as an assault against feminism.

http://www.matadornetwork.com/change/piss-feminist/

[Statsi]

Just being unapologetically male should do it.

[Volk]

Ohh. of course. MatadorNetwork.
This site showed up once a few years ago, and it had a couple of guys writing very good articles on travel. Then I started to notice this bitchy, narcissistic and self absorbed tone on the articles that were only about "finding oneself" and a big pile of "me me me me". I was not surprised to see that they put a bunch of women as "writers". I kept it on the RSS for the few good articles and then, after a few weeks they started to disappear and got replaced by more travel whores and apparently gay guys. I deleted this from any feed.

Now I see feminists articles. Color me surprised.

On another totally unrelated topic :
- Short, chopped hair : Check
- Strange, alien-looking, purple growth in from of her head, trying to appear edgy : Check

We've got damaged goods here, posting on a poisoned blog. Move along.

[Beyond Borders]

I don't even have to open the link to know how to anger a feminist.

Just kick her in the balls.

[svenski7]

Tell her you read RooshV and are a registered member of RVF.

[Beyond Borders]

I opened the link anyways (against my better judgement).

Typical annoying shit.

I do agree with her about the nice guys though. I've yet to finish it, but read the book, "No More Mr. Nice Guy." Probably a good one for a lot of guys who are drawn the manosphere, and Glover makes a good argument for "nice guys" not being that nice at all.

Most are just manipulators who haven't learned healthy ways to get what they want.

[Jackreacher]

"How to anger a white supremacist"

[Days of Broken Arrows]

(02-19-2014 03:13 PM)Beyond Borders Wrote:  

I opened the link anyways (against my better judgement).

Typical annoying shit.

I do agree with her about the nice guys though. I've yet to finish it, but read the book, "No More Mr. Nice Guy." Probably a good one for a lot of guys who are drawn the manosphere, and Glover makes a good argument for "nice guys" not being that nice at all.

Most are just manipulators who haven't learned healthy ways to get what they want.

Not necessarily true. Some people (men and women) take a while to warm to others. I was one of these types when I was young and still am to a degree.

For example, I might meet a woman and think I'd only want to be friends with her. Maybe I think she's nice-looking but too stiff. Or maybe I thought we had nothing in common, but it turned out we did. Or maybe we just didn't click at first but then we "got" each other. But after a few months, a bell would go off in my head and I'd think "Wait, she's really cool! Why don't I ask her out?"

Years ago, this used to be called "Getting to know someone and judging them on qualities other than looks."

Today, feminists have perverted it into the "nice guy" meme. And IMO, the reason for that is that feminists are immature women who never grew up and believe in "love at first sight" -- and now want to enforce that as the norm.

Conversely, I've had this done to me by women. I can't tell you the number of times I'd know a woman for months and she had no interest in me. But eventually something would click and she'd say something like "When I met you I thought you were weird and rude, but I finally got your humor!" Cue up make-out session.

This, by the way, is how real relationships used to be forged pre-hook-up culture. You'd take the time to weigh their good and bad qualities, then decide if you were a couple. And it's why couples I went to high school and college with stayed together: they weren't dating an image of a person -- they were dating someone they actually took time to get to know.

If anything has contributed to the total breakdown of relationships, it's the idea that you need to instantaneously need to know if you want to date someone. Life is never that simple.

But feminists are.

[Professor Fox]

"Claire Litton is a sexologist, educator, and online counsellor currently based in Montreal, Canada. She is a regular contributor to Nerve Magazine and Audiosmut Montreal. She has a background in Counselling Psychology and is constantly amazed by the range of human sexual experience."

[Grit]

You ever read stories about betas who get the constant shoulder-crying along the lines of, "God! Men are such chauvinistic pigs. What a bunch of bastards."

The implication is that in the woman's mind, the beta doesn't qualify as a man, and it only reinforces the beta's belief he isn't like that, vis a vis being a nice guy. Meanwhile, its a pure takeaway he doesn't even recognize, since she acts in favor of chauvinist men while the beta isnt looking.

My suggestion is to subject feminists to the same routine, but different approach, like:

"God! All women care about is dresses and shoes. Women have no idea how to budget money. Women care more about looking pretty and their giant purses. Its so frustrating."

To explain, in the man's mind the feminist doesn't qualify as a woman (since feminists don't care about looking pretty), and it only reinforces the feminist's belief that she isn't like that, vis a vis the pink butch hair, etc. Meanwhile, its a pure takeaway she probably intuitively recognizes: men don't consider feminists to be women.

Of course, she is now stuck, because she cannot defend the women who pursue beauty- that would admit she is low status and cannot compete with pretty women. It would contradict feminist thought.

She also cannot double down and hate on pretty women, since doing so would indirectly prove her insecurity coming from a loser, low status. Remember, feminists never ever suggest that they hate beautiful women. Their "all about me" strategy is purposely meant to conceal their loser status.

She also cannot suggest that the man shuts up, since she self-professes an ideology that should really agree with the man's argument.

Of course, her only real (logical) option is to agree with the man, thereby tacitly agreeing that she is low status. Her illogical option is to try and ignore her own status to defend the clitocracy. She could also attack the man ad hominem, but it would make her look childish.

TL;DR- Insult a feminist by reminding her that "women only care about purses, shoes, designer bags, hours of makeup and hair. God, its so annoying! Can you believe that women are like this?"

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

Quote:

Claire Litton is a sexologist, educator, and online counsellor

Her poor, poor patients... I wonder how many lives she's poisoned

[Beyond Borders]

Fuck. What puked on her head?

[TigerMandingo]

(02-19-2014 03:36 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(02-19-2014 03:13 PM)Beyond Borders Wrote:  

I opened the link anyways (against my better judgement).

Typical annoying shit.

I do agree with her about the nice guys though. I've yet to finish it, but read the book, "No More Mr. Nice Guy." Probably a good one for a lot of guys who are drawn the manosphere, and Glover makes a good argument for "nice guys" not being that nice at all.

Most are just manipulators who haven't learned healthy ways to get what they want.

Not necessarily true. Some people (men and women) take a while to warm to others. I was one of these types when I was young and still am to a degree.

For example, I might meet a woman and think I'd only want to be friends with her. Maybe I think she's nice-looking but too stiff. Or maybe I thought we had nothing in common, but it turned out we did. Or maybe we just didn't click at first but then we "got" each other. But after a few months, a bell would go off in my head and I'd think "Wait, she's really cool! Why don't I ask her out?"

Years ago, this used to be called "Getting to know someone and judging them on qualities other than looks."

Today, feminists have perverted it into the "nice guy" meme. And IMO, the reason for that is that feminists are immature women who never grew up and believe in "love at first sight" -- and now want to enforce that as the norm.

Conversely, I've had this done to me by women. I can't tell you the number of times I'd know a woman for months and she had no interest in me. But eventually something would click and she'd say something like "When I met you I thought you were weird and rude, but I finally got your humor!" Cue up make-out session.

This, by the way, is how real relationships used to be forged pre-hook-up culture. You'd take the time to weigh their good and bad qualities, then decide if you were a couple. And it's why couples I went to high school and college with stayed together: they weren't dating an image of a person -- they were dating someone they actually took time to get to know.

If anything has contributed to the total breakdown of relationships, it's the idea that you need to instantaneously need to know if you want to date someone. Life is never that simple.

But feminists are.

This a million times. Back in my OkCupid days, I would receive messages along the lines of, "Sorry, based on your profile, I just dont feel that we have a connection". (italics mine). I would usually shrug it off and think, "Ok, that's cool". Now looking back, it's absolutely asinine how these bitches size men up in a matter of seconds based on some innocuous details.

[delicioustacos]

This article is the most boring, hackish shit I've ever laid eyes on.

I'm not even antifeminist. I can't hang with the manosphere's nutty political shit. But the thought of this dullard getting PAID for stringing together 7 cliches that have been DONE TO FUCKING DEATH with NO new insight, no honesty, not even extremist entertainment value... somehow this is the one that broke me.

I'm gonna go gangbang a drunk college broad. Hire a woman and pay her 77 cents on the dollar. Catcall every girl I see on the street. It'll be nothing but microaggression after microaggression from me from now on. I'm gonna start a trendy clothing line and not make plus sizes available. I'm gonna write legislation that restricts abortion in meaningless ways in states no one gives a fuck about. I'm gonna body shame Beyonce on twitter. I'm gonna create a TV show and make sure the "diversity" woman writer of color paid for by free network money is Asian, The Race that Doesn't Count. I'm gonna sit on the bus with my knees spread wide like the wings of a mighty condor. Take up at least three seats and project my scrotum musk into the horrified faces of fellow passengers. I'm gonna sit in the back row of tech conferences and say "dongle." I'm gonna mansplain the shit out of everything to everyone, in cisnormative heteronormative shaming language. I will buy every little girl I know a Disney Princess wardrobe and EZ bake oven in bubble gum fucking pink.

How does this piece exist. How have we come to this. If you write words in public, you have an obligation as a human being to make them the truest, most interesting words you can. This is the exact opposite. Everyone involved in conceiving, writing, editing and publishing this should be fed to jackals. Jackals with AIDS.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

(02-19-2014 04:25 PM)delicioustacos Wrote:  

This article is the most boring, hackish shit I've ever laid eyes on.

I'm not even antifeminist. I can't hang with the manosphere's nutty political shit. But the thought of this dullard getting PAID for stringing together 7 cliches that have been DONE TO FUCKING DEATH with NO new insight, no honesty, not even extremist entertainment value... somehow this is the one that broke me.

I'm gonna go gangbang a drunk college broad. Hire a woman and pay her 77 cents on the dollar. Catcall every girl I see on the street. It'll be nothing but microaggression after microaggression from me from now on. I'm gonna start a trendy clothing line and not make plus sizes available. I'm gonna write legislation that restricts abortion in meaningless ways in states no one gives a fuck about. I'm gonna body shame Beyonce on twitter. I'm gonna create a TV show and make sure the "diversity" woman writer of color paid for by free network money is Asian, The Race that Doesn't Count. I'm gonna sit on the bus with my knees spread wide like the wings of a mighty condor. Take up at least three seats and project my scrotum musk into the horrified faces of fellow passengers. I'm gonna sit in the back row of tech conferences and say "dongle." I'm gonna mansplain the shit out of everything to everyone, in cisnormative heteronormative shaming language. I will buy every little girl I know a Disney Princess wardrobe and EZ bake oven in bubble gum fucking pink.

How does this piece exist. How have we come to this. If you write words in public, you have an obligation as a human being to make them the truest, most interesting words you can. This is the exact opposite. Everyone involved in conceiving, writing, editing and publishing this should be fed to jackals. Jackals with AIDS.

I wouldn't get too upset about the pay. It's around $20 an article. I've made far more from stock tips from this very site.

Source: http://matadornetwork.com/content/contri...pplicants/

[Vroom]

How to anger a feminist? Simply existing will do it.

[eradicator]

how to anger a feminist: show her a mirror. I mean literally, hold up a mirror to her and she sees her reflection, i wasn't trying to be figurative

[Vacancier Permanent]

How to anger a feminist, simply tell her to go back to the kitchen and cook you a homemade meal.

[Beyond Borders]

This thread has potential.

[Professor Fox]

How to anger a feminist?

Hold the door open for one.

Compliment their physical appearance.

[Suits]

How to anger a feminist: Ignore them.

[Barry Scrotada]

(02-19-2014 04:25 PM)delicioustacos Wrote:  

This article is the most boring, hackish shit I've ever laid eyes on.

How does this piece exist. How have we come to this. If you write words in public, you have an obligation as a human being to make them the truest, most interesting words you can. This is the exact opposite. Everyone involved in conceiving, writing, editing and publishing this should be fed to jackals. Jackals with AIDS.

We have obtained footage of the author at work:

[CRR]

(02-19-2014 02:45 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

Feminist explains how to anger them. "Nice guys" are now on the feminist shit list. She also draws the connection between fat shaming as an assault against feminism.

http://www.matadornetwork.com/change/piss-feminist/

This feminist has the classic ego/narcissist tendencies. She's angry because her conventional looks won't make her stand out so she has to get a stupid haircut as if to say "look at me". I'm sure her parents told her she was special no matter what anyone tells her.

And her bagging on "nice guys" is completely misguided. First of all, "nice guys" aren't trying to bang girls like her. Second, one would think she would have some empathy considering nice guys usually feel somewhat outcast due to their inability to express themselves. I can think of two friends off the top of my head who are in good shape, good guys, but get no poon because they are not assertive enough. But they sure ain't trying to bang girls like that, and nor should they.

So she's willing to shame "nice guys" but we can't fat shame? Fuck that noise.

[soup]

Everytime I get a hard-on, a feminist somewhere feels pings of anger.

[Private Man]

(02-20-2014 12:03 PM)soup Wrote:  

Everytime I get a hard-on, a feminist somewhere feels pings of anger.

Good one. Here's a dancing banana.