rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Cockblocking to be a required college subject
#1

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

Really remarkable article in the NYTimes about how all American college students will be required to study and learn cockblocking. And yes, they essentially use that term.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/09/educat....html?_r=0

"College men use two words to describe when a man gets in the way of another man’s business, and it is not 'bystander intervention.' For the purposes of a family newspaper, call it 'shot blocking.'"
Reply
#2

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

[Image: fuckthat.gif]

Take care of those titties for me.
Reply
#3

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

Other revelations from the article: isolating the target is now going to be considered essentially pre-rape.

Quote:Quote:

Lena Ngor, a University of Massachusetts senior, says that at about half a dozen parties a semester she has girlfriends who get drunk and need rescuing. At one party, a guy was all over her friend, so Ms. Ngor put an arm around her and told him, “She’s mine, you can’t have her.” When he suggested a threesome, she declined. “No way you can handle all this,” she said.

Also, consensual SNL = rape.

Quote:Quote:

“The two of them were touching, cuddling, it was obvious she was down for whatever,” says Mr. Martel, a junior. “She’d lost her inhibitions to the point that it really seemed like a good idea for her to go home with this guy she hardly knew.” Mr. Martel got between them to take her back to her dorm.
Reply
#4

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

It will be interesting to see if this leads to an outbursts. One way to neutralize a cock blocker is to go out with friends who can run interference.
Reply
#5

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

The RoK article writes itself.

What will the effects of this be?
1) Girls have always cockblocked, but now guys are being trained to do so as well - with ANY stranger running Game on a girl they know.

2) If you want to avoid being cockblocked/AMOGed, you MUST be in the social circle. They will leave you alone if they've seen you around before. Before you game the girl you must game the frat, the clique, whatever.

3) Social proof is no longer just a DHV. It will keep you out of jail.

4) Consent is only considered to be present if the girl propositions you. So we get even closer to peak alpha. The sexted snowboarder is overflowing with "consent," while any Game you run is pre-rape.
Reply
#6

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

I'm going to pour a shot of vodka out on my floor over this.

Game will be even more required in the near future in order to combat complete horseshit like this.
Reply
#7

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

The kicker quote is from a varsity athlete:

Quote:Quote:

Mr. Chaput looked like he had something to say but wasn’t sure he should. Finally, in a quiet voice, he said, “I waited until a girl asked me.”

In other words, if any explanation was needed, this system will NOT fuck with the poontastic status quo for natural alphas such as athletes.
Reply
#8

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

Quote: (02-11-2014 12:58 AM)BootNootly Wrote:  

Quote:Quote:

“The two of them were touching, cuddling, it was obvious she was down for whatever,” says Mr. Martel, a junior. “She’d lost her inhibitions to the point that it really seemed like a good idea for her to go home with this guy she hardly knew.” Mr. Martel got between them to take her back to her dorm.

Quote:Quote:

Mr Martel then stated at the next party he attended, he saw the same individual whom he had previously "shot blocked", and that individual proceeded to pummel his face.
Reply
#9

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

Heterosexuality is going to become an underground activity.
Reply
#10

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

Christ, this is not feminism. This is Childism.

[Image: childism.jpg]

They will do anything but teach girls to take responsibility for their own actions. If they really wanted to cut down on the incidence of these 'rapes', they should discourage girls from drinking themselves into oblivion.
Reply
#11

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

Christian, game in the near future will require the same prep as a military black op or high stakes burglery. Granted most guys these days don't have the discipline and experience to pull it off

I remember this kind of stuff starting when I was in college ten years ago. Sometimes shooting a hard look would work, but that tends to take the focus off sealing the deal. Also my wing man, looking back now, was worth squat.

There has to be a tactical doctrine we can workout to negate this crap. But thinking about it, it would involve a bit of preparation and drill.
Reply
#12

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

I have so much to say that I can't even say it.

[Image: WTF-Facepalm-In-Classic-TV-Show.gif]

Tuthmosis Twitter | IRT Twitter
Reply
#13

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

My Uni in the states is 10% FOB indians. I already get cockblocked all the time there, and now we're having fucking cockblocking classes too?

Fuck this shit, I'm staying in Bangkok.
Reply
#14

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

This is already going on. Check out this college white-knight training video. It's accurate in one respect: hitting on busted chicks is more likely to get you in trouble.

Like any other erosion of masculinity or shaming of normal male sexuality, women know they can't impose this bullshit without the aid of low-hanging fruit--pussy-ass gender traitors.





Tuthmosis Twitter | IRT Twitter
Reply
#15

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

They sure do have an interesting school mascot.

[Image: whitey.jpg]
Reply
#16

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

What the fuck did I just read?? What a bizarro world the American college landscape is becoming.

[Image: wtf.jpg]
Reply
#17

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

Quote: (02-11-2014 01:52 AM)El Rey Wrote:  

What the fuck did I just read?? What a bizarro world the American college landscape is becoming.

Damaged women (and their male enablers) are trying to strip away every sexual option a man has, especially to young, attractive chicks. The simple thought of sex, especially on a man's terms, offends these deranged bitches. The college campus represents that last bastion of sexual access to quality prospects. They want to kill it with fire.

Tuthmosis Twitter | IRT Twitter
Reply
#18

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

Tuth: I strongly recommend you write a ROK article on this and work your magic.
Reply
#19

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

And for those guests looking at this page planning to sexually assault one of the members.

Hey leave this forum alone. There's plenty of other forums out there downstairs.

Nope.
Reply
#20

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

What if the man is drunk too? Why isn't anyone's job to "rescue" him?

"Imagine" by HCE | Hitler reacts to Battle of Montreal | An alternative use for squid that has never crossed your mind before
Reply
#21

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

Yo, FUCK this shit.

And we can't do shit to stop this, atleast for now. College campuses are a terrible place for this shit. These are 18-22 year old guys who are getting into trouble. A lot of these kids are going to be bad at game or a lot of times, are TRYING to get good at game which is even worse when alcohol is involved.

Why is "trying" worse? Because they won't be massive bitches and white knights, they will actually go for the girl, show persistence, etc. They WANT to get laid, which is good, but don't necessarily have all the suave frame control, not seeming needy, etc, and this shit gets multiplied tenfold when a lot of pong and shots are involved. This means that the girl is more likely to "reneg consent" the next morning because she isn't proud of the bang.

Used to be, fuck even 5 years ago, that this was all very advisable game in college. Both get 10 drinks deep, go to a highlighter party, grind, have a few more drinks --> Fuck.

Now this is rape, more than ever.

Fuck, I'd rather HAVE a bystander intervene so as to stop me from falsely getting accused of rape the next morning.

Fucking cunts.





You don't get there till you get there
Reply
#22

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

Quote: (02-11-2014 01:37 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

This is already going on. Check out this college white-knight training video. It's accurate in one respect: hitting on busted chicks is more likely to get you in trouble.

Like any other erosion of masculinity or shaming of normal male sexuality, women know they can't impose this bullshit without the aid of low-hanging fruit--pussy-ass gender traitors.




Holy fuck that video.

That's just stupid.

Yes awkward situations and bad game are now = rape. What the fuck.

I really hope this shit doesn't catch on.
Reply
#23

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

This won't make any difference.

They had pregnancy prevention seminars at the beginning of each year when I was in college. Did we listen? Considering the multiple pregnancies and subsequent abortions on my dorm halls, the answer is "no."

We're dealing with college students thrown into an anything-goes environment, where birth control is easy to get (but often not even used), "judgement" is frowned upon, and morals have been deliberately removed from the curriculum.

The only way to prevent sexual assault is to go back to single-sex colleges and the chaperone system for dates. The irony is that feminists wanted all of that done away with because it was "oppressive."

Now they created another problem -- sloppy drunk kids of both sexes who can just go wild, and they expect to train them to do what adult chaperones did in the old days. Good luck with that.
Reply
#24

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

Quote: (02-11-2014 12:58 AM)BootNootly Wrote:  

Other revelations from the article: isolating the target is now going to be considered essentially pre-rape.

Quote:Quote:

Lena Ngor, a University of Massachusetts senior, says that at about half a dozen parties a semester she has girlfriends who get drunk and need rescuing. At one party, a guy was all over her friend, so Ms. Ngor put an arm around her and told him, “She’s mine, you can’t have her.” When he suggested a threesome, she declined. “No way you can handle all this,” she said.

Also, consensual SNL = rape.

Quote:Quote:

“The two of them were touching, cuddling, it was obvious she was down for whatever,” says Mr. Martel, a junior. “She’d lost her inhibitions to the point that it really seemed like a good idea for her to go home with this guy she hardly knew.” Mr. Martel got between them to take her back to her dorm.

I bet that the Lena chick is fat as shit.

And Mr. Martel is probably a virgin.

Every single one of us on this forum is a rape victim when we got drunk as shit and hooked up with a fatty.
Reply
#25

Cockblocking to be a required college subject

This isn't surprising, frankly. Still terrifyingly Orwellian. Anybody locked and loaded for a long post?

[Image: 0209-BUS-master675.jpg]

Quote:Quote:

Posters with messages like “Be a Man, Show Me Respect,” “Don’t Be a Passive Bystander” and “Do Something” are all over campus, in libraries, locker rooms, even on the sides of buses.

This is where society is now. We have fallen from simple aspirational messages in commercials in magazines and on TV. Now, we need propaganda at every corner, on the sides of every bus.

Women feel greatly insecure these days. The more normal ones cake on makeup, status whore and cruise social media all day. This has many roots, but the most salient one here is that women have an incredibly deep-seated sense of disappointment in men. Like Betty Freidan once famously observed, "it is a feeling that has no name." The feeling that men are failing women. Or, in words that would inflame a feminist's mind and loins, "Men aren't men anymore."

When women are deeply resentful of men as a class, they tend to treat men as beasts, stupid and incapable of morality that women possess. Women have always experienced shades of this in American society, but it didn't reach it's crescendo until after the Sexual Revolution.

As we see here, it manifests itself -- combined with other social forces -- as a ridiculous belief that sexual assault and rape is a critically important issue to address on campus. "Don't hang yourself ladies, it has declined very much so!" Yay, prevention! "Well, know 1 in 5 women is still violated on campuses." What was the original number? Statistics are flying about in this article, but I guarantee none of them match up and this is on purpose: this is a propaganda piece. "But, but it is a NYTimes piece!" Have you watched Fox News? "They are too ideological for my taste." You don't say!

The more political women -- who think that ideology can displace personal awareness (feminists) -- make the leap from their own psychology to politics. These sorts of women live in a world where whatever they think is necessary to combat the "problem" is necessarily justified. This is perfectly captured by the glowingly progressive woman in the article, MS. Stapleton:

Quote:Quote:

Women on campus, including Ms. Stapleton, the researcher, led protest marches, occupied a dean’s office and at one point surrounded him, linked arms and refused to let him go until he responded to their demands. It took months, but eventually the administration started making the changes that are in place today.

Ah, so some student activists -- armed with only their own incensed rage and a sense of grandiosity fueled by latent narcissism -- used physical coercion to force a man against his will to act. Of course, this was justified, because he would be forced to stop men from physically coercing women against their will, as they know the true way to prevent sexual assault. I mean, they are the ones they have been waiting for on sexual assault, right? Feminism says so.

As always, note the transference. She knows that she has strong impulses to get what she wants through force - she ignores this in herself and instead projects that out onto the "true perpetrators:" men.

Quote:Quote:

It appears to have had an impact. Shortly after the 1987 rape, 37 percent of female students reported experiencing unwanted intercourse or other sexual contact; by 2006, it was 21 percent, and by 2012, 16 percent.

By the same methodology to determine what constitutes sexual assault? These people *can't* admit failure -- unless it is done a tawdry, maudlin "Look at me!" way -- so they game the system behind the scenes and alter standards. I really wish I could link to the article, but it is buried in a couple older law review articles and a dense book of legal articles that called out these "anti-sexual assault" activists for their shifty data collection and altering of definitions to game outcomes.

Once again, we have "1 in 5" & "37% of women claiming to be assaulted to 16% assaulted 25 years later?" Why do you use assume it is a necessary result of your efforts? Leaving obvious dubious statistics aside, what about independent, intervening events? Less men on campus, men retreating into video games/bronies/4chan?

"But, but rape is always about power!" Where did you hear that, MSNBC? I thought rape and rape culture was a complex diversity issue? Yet, it only has one and only one cause: men seeking power over women. Ah, reflexive framing of women's lives as not a man's choice.

Yes, Charlotte, rape is always wrong. But to reflexively frame it through those beasts of men seeking to make decisions for you is odd and antiquated. Shouldn't women frame it as unwanted and forced & that's all that needs to be said? People force others to do things every day but it often isn't about power. To assume that posture on rape as based out of power reinforces that women are doing things simply because "it isn't a decision a man makes." Which is why men suggesting women grow their hair out, wear makeup or men raping women pisses most all women off. One of those things is not like the other, but I have a small penis so what do I know.

In sum, liberation = not involving/pleasing/forced or suggested by a man. One tip: invest in Purina stock, tomorrow if you can.

[Image: Women%20drinking%20wine.jpg]

Quote:Quote:

More than 60 percent of claims involving sexual violence handled by United Educators from 2005 to 2010 involved young women who were so drunk they had no clear memory of the assault.

What sorcery is this? How do you know women were raped but they didn't know it? I think Rachel Maddow did a special on this once. I didn't watch, but I hear she went undercover as a mattress and found out that women got paid 75 cents on the dollar against men. Wait, wrong thread?

Still, these sorts of beliefs that women are raped so frequently on campuses is an antiquated reaction to movies like "Porkies" and "Animal House." Parents of young adults sent to campuses were appalled by these movies and, further, disgusted by the drinking, revelry and sex shared freely. This dovetails America's deep distrust of Hollywood and their anti-social freewheeling. Parents took a personal interest in these sorts of behaviors once their young were shipped off to schools hours away.

Suddenly, campuses were seen as hotbeds of anti-social behavior and apparently the only two criticisms of this perception that exist to this day is a weak one of alcohol and strong one about sexual assault. The Christofeminist Porn Wars took off because of this, with feminists in one hand and conservative Christians in the other.

Quote:Quote:

IT IS MOSTLY WOMEN who have spearheaded the fight against sexual assault, founded the rape prevention centers, staffed the hotlines, dominated the research in the field, led the Take Back the Night marches and organized the sexual consent campaigns. And it is men who commit most of the world’s violence.

In other words, men don't really care about sexual assault (rape culture) and more narcissism framed as selfless devotion at the vicious machinations of men. Of course, they later say that only a few men commit the majority of assaults. "Whew!" the reader thinks, "And here I was being sold a reality of dark, rapey masculinity!" Dumbass men get to think, "Hey, they are selling us as not all violent beasts!" Yeah, dumbass, after they painted a grim picture of male domination and rape of women.

Classic female posturing about how women have superior ethical and moral compasses. Congratulate yourself, ladies. You have figured out rape is wrong and are doing your utmost to erode criminal laws and Constitutional protections, replacing them with inferior administrative approaches at the collegiate level.

These are the same people who think that women are better friends and spouses -- even though media at large *knows* that isn't true. Desperate Housewives? The mindless drama of "The L Word?" Reality TV? "Teen Mom?" Men aren't watching these shows and the media knows but women won't admit it -- least of all feminists.

Quote:Quote:

The coaches repeatedly pound into their heads that a woman not saying no is not the same as a woman saying yes. “If there is 1 percent doubt in my mind,” Mr. Rowe said, “it’s not worth doing it. Unless she gives consent, she can say, ‘I was raped,’ and it’s your word against hers.”

If a girl wants to have sex,” he continued, “you’ll know it. She has that look in her eyes. She’s been talking to you, she bothers you, she walks by you all night, the whole thing, you talk, you let it evolve.”

Mr. Chaput looked like he had something to say but wasn’t sure he should. Finally, in a quiet voice, he said, “I waited until a girl asked me.

These are the same people who detest creationism, citing the science of evolution -- while completely ignoring actual science on evolution. If humans evolved from primates, then you are conceding language -- as understood now -- isn't the basis for consent, but that body language must be. You know, commonly accepted science that most information between humans is conveyed via body language. Apparently, there is a feminist exception for consent for sex.

Once again, another attempt at reviving Antioch College's patently absurd approach to consent and sex.

One more critical point needs to be articulated. I would recommend you read this article by The Last Psychiatrist: "No Self-Respecting Woman Would Go Outside Without Makeup."

His outstandingly brilliant closing section:

Quote:Quote:

Speaking of no one being upset about rape, here's a story, starts out bad and gets even worse in ways you won't expect: a 16 year old girl is passed out drunk at a party, she is then allegedly raped by a/two high school football players, and carried unconscious to other parties and displayed and/or raped, and apparently because the town has a "football culture" no arrests are made, it's hushed up, the boys are protected, and I think to myself, oh, that's weird, is that town still in 1986? True story: in 1986, at a mixer at the Delta Gamma sorority house, Lacoste Football Guy gets hard for 16 year old sister of Benetton Girl, and in order to get her jeans off he hits her in the head with a lamp, so in order to keep her jeans on she kicks him in the mouth, and through the blood and fury he's screaming he'll sue her, do you know who my father is? NB: he went on to become a lawyer and no I am not making that up.

"Ugh, even now, 25 years later, it's still a hypermasculine rape culture." Ha! No. Hypermasculine? Where are you, the Dominican? No, what's amazing/obvious is how after 25 years of Diane Sawyer and makeup debates, not one other girl at this party came to the victim's aid; not one girl saw what was happening at the party and simultaneously called 911 and Facetimed the crime; not one girl called all the women she knew and brought the wrath of Athena down on that town. Nope. Nothing. A lot of laughing and giggling though, turns out rape is funny, someone owes Daniel Tosh a huge apology. "Women's styles tend to be more collaborative." I can tell, they collaborated to keep their mouth shut. In 1986 the sorority girls also collaborated to blame the victim for for being so rough with Lacoste Guy: "How could you do that to him? His face is like, totally corroded." Hey, come on, look how he was dressed, he was asking for it.

"We need more women in power." Wrong preposition, dummy, but anyway you have them. You have judges and prosecutors and twenty female senators, what has it gotten you? Your own ground floor women don't protect each other, you know who had to come to this teen's aid? Anonymous. Men.

Of course I don't know if the boys really did these things or not, ok? But if the reason the boys were protected was the "football culture," that means people in the town were taught to protect them. And if the girls did nothing, it means they were taught to do nothing, and the people most responsible for that lesson was other women.

"No, the town was corrupt, they swept these kinds of things under the rug for years." If you've known for years the town isn't going to help women, if you've known for years it's a "hypermasculine rape culture," wouldn't that make women want to stick together more?
It's not like these teen girls were denied an education or had to endure sexual harrassment at work or had to go to Sweden to get abortions, if there was ever a generation that should feel most empowered it would be them, yet they-- not just one of them; all of them-- "knew", somehow, that they could/should do nothing. Which means that they were taught that from somewhere, and the only place that it could have come was older women. "The other lesson is: makeup is a choice." Today I learned nothing.

There's your female empowerment, there's you feminist progress, catastrophically subverted from the top down, like it's in an abusive relationship, satisfied with the house and the car and the 4/7 good days and simply doesn't want to rock the boat so it expends frantic energy on what is ultimately nonsense. Every stupid parent teaches their girls not to get raped, duh, but have any mothers spent any time indoctrinating their daughters what to do if another woman is being raped? Have they made it a reflex to defend, to attack? "Isn't that obvious?" Ask the town. "We need to support each other!" sure, as long as it's from the safety of a computer monitor or a 5K, yay women. Have you explicitly told your daughters that if a woman is passed out drunk and you see a Notre Dame Hat climbing over her couch, it is your responsibility to grab an aerosol can and a lighter and threaten Armageddon, or at the very least yell stop? "Well, that's kind of dangerous." Yeah, that's kind of the point, but I grant you that it's safer to giggle and let boys be boys. Do you want power, or the trappings of power? Somebody's going to have it, you can't make it vanish. I wasn't at this particular rape, the town's defense amazingly appears to be she was a slut and she was asking for it, and my point is: so what? Why didn't the other women stop it anyway? Why didn't they just rise up?

Quote:Old Chinese Man Wrote:  
why you wonder how many man another man bang? why you care who bang who mr high school drama man
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)