[thoughtgypsy]

Some really strange details surrounding the new Colorado airport. To start, there are many strange mural scenes.



One image depicts a future stormtrooper eradicating life. The dove (symbolizing peace?) is being impaled with a machete, while the children in the mural are in the path of the sword. The people who are being eradicated resemble tribal cultures. The children that are about to be killed are inexplicably surrounded by bricks. As a side note, in game theory, bricks are said to represent smaller, independent networks that when combined create a larger foundation.



The capstone of the building shows the masonic emblem (As above, so below), and for some reason, contains a time capsule below it to be revealed in 2094.



Another mural showing death and destruction. In this one, children are seen crying over the corpses of 3 separate individuals representing tribal or nationalist cultures. Strange inclusion of a phoenix (the purple bird), often used in masonic symbolism to represent the rebirth of an initiate upon gaining the wisdom of the order.



After all of the death and destruction, this mural seems to be depicting a period of peace. What's interesting is the weapons which are being turned in to be destroyed and melted down (gun confiscation?) are wrapped in flags symbolizing separate nations. Is this a portent for the destruction of nations to form a new globalist world order?



Random gargoyles in suitcases

Quote:

Finally, let’s return to those bunkers. The photo above is a blueprint of 5 buildings that were mysteriously buried during the early days of construction on the Denver Airport. These five large buildings were fully constructed and subsequently deemed to have been ‘positioned incorrectly.’
Rather than being demolished, the buildings were ordered to be buried, yes buried. The ‘underground bases’, as they are referred, are currently being used as “storage” according to airport authorities. This fact is not debated. We already know there is an underground structure beneath the airport. The real question is how deep the worm hole goes. We may never know…

http://thechive.com/2012/03/08/something...25-photos/

Could all be coincidence, but creepy nonetheless.

[thoughtgypsy]

I came across an excellent essay written by Oxford University historian Richard Dolan. I highly recommend everyone whose so inclined to take the time to read and share:

"The United States comprises large organizations – corporations, bureaucracies, ‘interest groups,’ and the like – which are conspiratorial by nature. That is, they are hierarchical, their important decisions are made in secret by a few key decision-makers, and they are not above lying about their activities. Such is the nature of organizational behaviour. ‘Conspiracy,’ in this key sense, is a way of life around the globe.

Within the world’s military and intelligence apparatuses, this tendency is magnified to the greatest extreme. During the 1940s, […] the military and its scientists developed the world’s most awesome weapons in complete secrecy… […]

Anyone who has lived in a repressive society knows that official manipulation of the truth occurs daily. But societies have their many and their few. In all times and all places, it is the few who rule, and the few who exert dominant influence over what we may call official culture. – All elites take care to manipulate public information to maintain existing structures of power. It’s an old game.

America is nominally a republic and free society, but in reality an empire and oligarchy, vaguely aware of its own oppression, within and without. I have used the term ‘national security state’ to describe its structures of power. It is a convenient way to express the military and intelligence communities, as well as the worlds that feed upon them, such as defence contractors and other underground, nebulous entities. Its fundamental traits are secrecy, wealth, independence, power, and duplicity.

Nearly everything of significance undertaken by America’s military and intelligence community in the past half-century has occurred in secrecy. The undertaking to build an atomic weapon, better known as the Manhattan Project, remains the great model for all subsequent activities. For more than two years, not a single member of Congress even knew about it although its final cost exceeded two billion dollars.

During and after the Second World War, other important projects, such as the development of biological weapons, the importation of Nazi scientists, terminal mind-control experiments, nationwide interception of mail and cable transmissions of an unwitting populace, infiltration of the media and universities, secret coups, secret wars, and assassinations all took place far removed not only from the American public, but from most members of Congress and a few presidents. Indeed, several of the most powerful intelligence agencies were themselves established in secrecy, unknown by the public or Congress for many years.

Since the 1940s, the U.S. Defence and Intelligence establishment has had more money at its disposal than most nations. In addition to official dollars, much of the money is undocumented. From its beginning, the C.I.A. was engaged in a variety of off-the-record “business” activities that generated large sums of cash. The connections of the CIA with global organized crime (and the de facto trade of international narcotics trade) are well established and documented for many years. – Much of the original money to run the American intelligence community came from very wealthy and established American families, who have long maintained an interest in funding national security operations important to their interests.

In theory, civilian oversight exists over the US national security establishment. The president is the military commander-in-chief. Congress has official oversight over the CIA. The F.B.I. must answer to the Justice Department. In practice, little of this applies. One reason has to do with secrecy. […]

A chilling example of such independence occurred during the 1950s, when President Eisenhower effectively lost control of the U.S. nuclear arsenal. The situation deteriorated so much that during his final two years in office, Eisenhower asked repeatedly for an audience with the head of Strategic Air Command to learn what America’s nuclear retaliatory plan was. What he finally learned in 1960, his final year in office, horrified him: half of the Northern Hemisphere would be obliterated.

If a revered military hero such as Eisenhower could not control America’s nuclear arsenal, nor get a straight answer from the Pentagon, how on earth could Presidents Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, or Nixon regarding comparable matters?

Secrecy, wealth and independence add up to power. Through the years, the national security state has gained access to the world’s most sophisticated technology sealed off millions of acres of land from public access or scrutiny, acquired unlimited snooping ability within U.S. borders and beyond, conducted overt or clandestine actions against other nations, and prosecuted wars without serious media scrutiny. Domestically, it maintains influence over elected officials and communities hoping for some of the billions of defence dollars.

Deception is the key element of warfare, and when winning is all that matters, the conventional morality held by ordinary people becomes an impediment. When taken together, the examples of official duplicity form a nearly single totality. They include such choice morsels as the phony war crisis of 1948, the fabricated missile gap claimed by the air force during the 1950s, the carefully managed events leading to the Gulf of Tonkin resolution… […]

The secrecy stems from a pervasive and fundamental element of life in our world, that those who are at the top of the heap will always take whatever steps are necessary to maintain the status quo.

[S]keptics often ask, ‘Do you really think the government could hide [anything] for so long?’ The question itself reflects ignorance of the reality that secrecy is a way of life in the National Security State. Actually though, the answer is yes, and no.
Yes, in that cover-ups are standard operating procedure, frequently unknown to the public for decades, becoming public knowledge by a mere roll of the dice. No, in that … information has leaked out from the very beginning. It is impossible to shut the lid completely. The key lies in neutralizing and discrediting unwelcomed information, sometimes through official denial, other times through proxies in the media.

[E]vidence [of conspiracy] derived from a grass roots level is unlikely to survive its inevitable conflict with official culture. And acknowledgement about the reality of [conspiracies] will only occur when the official culture deems it worthwhile or necessary to make it. Don’t hold your breath.

This is a widespread phenomenon affecting many people, generating high levels of interest, taking place in near-complete secrecy, for purposes unknown, by agencies unknown, with access to incredible resources and technology. A sobering thought and cause for reflection.”

[debeguiled]

That was brilliant.

[911]

Yeah good stuff, it ties in a bit with the writings of Georgetown Prof. Carroll Quigley (Tragedy and Hope, The Anglo-American Establishment).

http://www.carrollquigley.net/books.htm

[nomadbrah]

As far as conspiracy theories go, I've always been amazed at how easily the average person is convinced that they're not serfs. I've noticed in the last decade that tv shows depicting the obscene wealth of the elite have gotten more and more candid. Where in the past I would more easily accept 1% wealth, when you really see it up close it makes my stomach turn and I am filled with disgust. When you see a tv show about the elite's yachts and see the model hot 18 year old girls lining up to literally scrub toilets (and other things) with a staff of 50 and you realize this is just the yacht to their private yet and 20 mansions around the world.

Well, I am no marxist, but I am filled with disgust, because I realize the lie of democracy, kings and queens are alive more than ever. The elite live in far greater luxury than any emperor in the past. Their control much greater than any royal family, because they cannot be separated their heads from bodies by an unruly mob.

Maybe they really are genetically superior to us serfs, why else would we accept this absurd difference in wealth? Even a guy like Bernie Sanders either doesn't understand or doesn't dare expose the actual extreme difference in standards of living.

[Pride male]

^Didnt the elite work their way to all that immense wealth? Dont they deserve it?

[nomadbrah]

(04-19-2016 04:00 AM)Pride male Wrote:  

^Didnt the elite work their way to all that immense wealth? Dont they deserve it?

Depends on your definition on 'deserve'. Would you care to make a moral argument for accrued interest?

Most of the absurd wealth of the elite has been created by simple accrued interest.

If they deserve it or not, that isn't really my point, it is the denial of the general public that we are peasent serfs compared to the elite and that the elite has wealth and influence of unfattomable proportions today.

I'm not arguing morally, I find it strange that for all the petty jealousy of people, leading to things like socialism, why do they not more desire the things the elite have, the hot women, the unending freedom, the power, the decadence.

It's like people are limited in their minds to even imagine such wealth and prosperity of the elite.

I find the decadence of the modern elite disgusting, it's one thing to have a vacation house or two and a nice car, it's another to drag race your luxury cars in London as the arabs do while not observing law. It's another to have a yacht the size of a battleship which lies dormant 3/4 of the year like Abramovic, these are the actions of people who hold the plebs in comtempt. Or to fly young women in from all over the world to voluntary sexual slavery.

[Pride male]

^I cant judge the elite on their extravagance because I would probably do the same. I suspect if the serfs were in their expensive shoes they would to.

[thoughtgypsy]

The term "Conspiracy Theory" was intentionally created in the 1960s in order to discredit information which was critical of the ruling hierarchy at the time.

Quote:

Specifically, in April 1967, the CIA wrote a dispatch which coined the term “conspiracy theories” … and recommended methods for discrediting such theories. The dispatch was marked “psych” – short for “psychological operations” or disinformation – and “CS” for the CIA’s “Clandestine Services” unit.

The dispatch was produced in responses to a Freedom of Information Act request by the New York Times in 1976.

The dispatch states:

2. This trend of opinion is a matter of concern to the U.S. government, including our organization.

***

The aim of this dispatch is to provide material countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries. Background information is supplied in a classified section and in a number of unclassified attachments.

3. Action. We do not recommend that discussion of the [conspiracy] question be initiated where it is not already taking place. Where discussion is active addresses are requested:

a. To discuss the publicity problem with and friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors) , pointing out that the [official investigation of the relevant event] made as thorough an investigation as humanly possible, that the charges of the critics are without serious foundation, and that further speculative discussion only plays into the hands of the opposition. Point out also that parts of the conspiracy talk appear to be deliberately generated by … propagandists. Urge them to use their influence to discourage unfounded and irresponsible speculation.

b. To employ propaganda assets to and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose. The unclassified attachments to this guidance should provide useful background material for passing to assets. Our ploy should point out, as applicable, that the critics are (I) wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in, (II) politically interested, (III) financially interested, (IV) hasty and inaccurate in their research, or (V) infatuated with their own theories.

***

4. In private to media discussions not directed at any particular writer, or in attacking publications which may be yet forthcoming, the following arguments should be useful:

a. No significant new evidence has emerged which the Commission did not consider.

***

b. Critics usually overvalue particular items and ignore others. They tend to place more emphasis on the recollections of individual witnesses (which are less reliable and more divergent–and hence offer more hand-holds for criticism) …

***

c. Conspiracy on the large scale often suggested would be impossible to conceal in the United States, esp. since informants could expect to receive large royalties, etc.

***

d. Critics have often been enticed by a form of intellectual pride: they light on some theory and fall in love with it; they also scoff at the Commission because it did not always answer every question with a flat decision one way or the other.

***

f. As to charges that the Commission’s report was a rush job, it emerged three months after the deadline originally set. But to the degree that the Commission tried to speed up its reporting, this was largely due to the pressure of irresponsible speculation already appearing, in some cases coming from the same critics who, refusing to admit their errors, are now putting out new criticisms.

g. Such vague accusations as that “more than ten people have died mysteriously” can always be explained in some natural way ….

5. Where possible, counter speculation by encouraging reference to the Commission’s Report itself. Open-minded foreign readers should still be impressed by the care, thoroughness, objectivity and speed with which the Commission worked. Reviewers of other books might be encouraged to add to their account the idea that, checking back with the report itself, they found it far superior to the work of its critics.

Quote:

Summarizing the tactics which the CIA dispatch recommended:

- Claim that it would be impossible for so many people would keep quiet about such a big conspiracy
- Have people friendly to the CIA attack the claims, and point back to “official” reports
- Claim that eyewitness testimony is unreliable
- Claim that this is all old news, as “no significant new evidence has emerged”
- Ignore conspiracy claims unless discussion about them is already too active
- Claim that it’s irresponsible to speculate
- Accuse theorists of being wedded to and infatuated with their theories
- Accuse theorists of being politically motivated
- Accuse theorists of having financial interests in promoting conspiracy theories

Read the whole article here: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/02/con.html
(Highly recommended)

[debeguiled]

(04-19-2016 04:00 AM)Pride male Wrote:  

^Didnt the elite work their way to all that immense wealth? Dont they deserve it?

That is exactly what they want you to think.

[PhDre]

(04-18-2016 07:27 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

I've noticed in the last decade that tv shows depicting the obscene wealth of the elite have gotten more and more candid. Where in the past I would more easily accept 1% wealth, when you really see it up close it makes my stomach turn and I am filled with disgust. When you see a tv show about the elite's yachts and see the model hot 18 year old girls lining up to literally scrub toilets (and other things) with a staff of 50 and you realize this is just the yacht to their private yet and 20 mansions around the world.

(04-19-2016 05:35 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

I find the decadence of the modern elite disgusting, it's one thing to have a vacation house or two and a nice car, it's another to drag race your luxury cars in London as the arabs do while not observing law. It's another to have a yacht the size of a battleship which lies dormant 3/4 of the year like Abramovic, these are the actions of people who hold the plebs in comtempt. Or to fly young women in from all over the world to voluntary sexual slavery.

The people you see on tv parading their luxury and decadence are not the real elite.
Sure, they might be filthy rich, they avoid taxes and they bribe politicians to award overpriced contracts to their companies.
They are worth maybe 10 million, 100 million or even 1 billion.
But they are not influencing the politics of an entire country or even continent.
They do not have the influence to instigate war when it suits them.
They do not have the influence to push feminism, LGBT rights, mass immigration and cultural marxism onto the western world.
They do not have the influence to pass tax laws that hit the working class and SME's hard such that talented and hard working individuals cannot move upwards in society.
They are not responsible for our reduced buying power, stock market crashes or the financial crisis.
These people might have inherited their money, or earned it in an honest or non-honest way.
They might be richer than 99,9999% of the world population and live a decadent lifestyle that offends when so many are struggling.
But they are not actively harming others and I don't hate them; I would probably do just the same if I had the money.

The real globalist elite are not decadently displaying their wealth.
No, they care about the poor and they donate billions to NGO's to help people in Africa get vaccines and GMO food, to spread truth and freedom of speech in Russia, and to brainwash the European people into accepting millions of muslims into their countries.
These people have the power to destroy our societies and turn us into slaves for the benefit of their families and they are actively doing so.

Don't be wary of the Arab driving his gold Veyron through the streets of Paris or London; be wary of Gates, Soros, Rothschild, Rockefeller and the likes donating billions to NGO's and preaching to us about solidarity, progress, discrimination, privilege,...

[MY DETROIT PLAYAS]

Once I started reading up a bit more I starting really noticing similar images about in the 90's, but now they have become more blatant and brash.

It's almost as if they are daring the common folk to decode their meaning.

Most people will go about their day, or just glance and think them to themselves 'What a cool mural'.

[Tim in real life]

A former boss of mine is from Denver and she confirmed to me that post on Denver International, two years before I joined RVF.

[GillesDeleuze]

As Ph Dre said, the elite are the globocrats, not VIPs who appear on television,cinemas,tv shows,etc

Trans Atlantic Business Dialogue, European Roundtable of Industrialists, Mount Pelerin Society,Adam Smith Institute, all these think tanks plays a huge role in influencing monetary and fiscal policies of central banks and governments

Quite common is phenomenon called ''sliding doors'', when a former executive of a bank or think tank become part of national government of a country (for example Mario Monti who was advisor for Goldman Sachs and recently Italy's Prime Minister)

Neoclassical economic theory has taken over the entire academic thinking thanks to these organizations who are partners of the most important business school of the world, if you attend lessons at these universities they teach the same concepts based on the same assumptions (inflation is a monster, debt must be kept under certain parameters, deregulation of job market, heavy privatization of national assets and state companies,etc)

[xxMarco]

I recently stumbled on a blog site from a guy named Miles Mathis. Lots of interesting conspiracy theories and information. I've been binge reading the site all week and it really blew my mind. The problem is I can't discuss any of this with people I know in real life or they'll think I'm a lunatic.
Here are a couple short papers he wrote that are simple:

How the mainstream media is controlled with language
http://mileswmathis.com/matrix.pdf
Commentary on famous people, gun control, Smith&Wesson, and more
http://mileswmathis.com/guru.pdf

The rest of the papers are in the following link but it gets pretty out there including how Tiger Woods is a Psyop and the Kennedy presidency. Thing is he makes some pretty good points and they are well written and backed by pretty good analysis.

http://mileswmathis.com/updates.html

If you have an open mind and are into this sort of stuff I would encourage you to check out his site.

[911]

He doesn't seem to be batting 1000, but interesting stuff nevertheless, I've downloaded a few papers.

[Off The Reservation]

http://www.fema.gov/news-release/2016/05...rcise-2016

"Capstone 2016 involves a series of five events."

Orlando
Dallas
ZIka
Pipeline
NYC

Congrats everyone its been a great summer of fake exercises. Your budgets will be increased now.

[Dr. Howard]

I've started reading/listening to some more freemason conspiracy stuff. Specifically regarding Lincoln.

It centers around Albert Pike https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Pike a big time freemason and confederate general who was charged with war crimes and fled to canada. It then goes on to allege that Lincoln was getting out of line, so they arranged for Andrew Johnson to be his running mate (also a big time mason). Surprise, lincoln is killed shortly after his 2nd inaguration Albert Pike returns to the USA and is pardoned as one of the first acts of new president Johnson.

[BrewDog]

I'm fascinated by 9/11. We hunted OBL for over a decade, and the USA never indicted him for the attacks. I was working for the US government at the time, and Bin Laden's Most Wanted poster was in our office. Years after 9/11 his wanted poster said nothing about 9/11, it said he was wanted for the bombings of the American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

https://thingseverybodyshouldknow.files....=439&h=513

Here is the most notorious criminal in history that led to the US invasion of Afghanistan, yet he is never even indicted by a federal grand jury, nor does his FBI poster say for over a decade that he is wanted for the 9/11 attacks. Was the FBI simply too busy to update the poster for the number one most wanted man in history?

No one took credit for the 9/11 attacks for months. What's the point of a terrorist attack for a political stance if you don't claim the attack? In fact, Bin Laden said he and Al Qaeda had nothing to do with 9/11 at least three times in the weeks following 9/11.

--"I stress that I have not carried out this act, which appears to have been carried out by individuals with their own motivation." -Osama Bin Laden 9/16/2001

--"I have already said that I am not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act." -Osama Bin Laden 9/28/2001

OBL also said that Al Qaeda's fight had never been against the common man but only with the US government. And that this was obviously an attack against the common man. All of Al Qaeda's attacks to this point had been vs. US government targets. US Embassies and the USS Cole.

Then the CIA releases a video of "Bin Laden" claiming culpability for the attacks. It's now referred to as the "Fatty Osama video." OBL is a very tall, thin man. 6'4"-160 pounds. In the CIA video used as evidence against Al Qaeda, OBL is wearing a military field jacket and has gained over 100 pounds in less than a month. He's also writing with his right hand. OBL is left handed. The CIA was caught lying and creating a false video. Look up the Fatty Osama video online.
===========================
"We've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming." —Dick Cheney, Interview by Tony Snow", March 29, 2006

"9/11 is not mentioned on Bin Laden's Most Wanted page. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connected Bin Laden to 9/11." —FBI agent Rex Tomb, June 6, 2006

On September 16, 2001, CNN reported that in a statement issued to Al Jazeera, bin Laden said, "I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks". "On September 20, 2001," according to the Guardian, "the Taliban offered to hand Osama bin Laden to a neutral Islamic country for trial if the US presented them with evidence that he was responsible for the attacks on New York and Washington. The US rejected the offer."

FBI Director Robert Mueller: "In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper - either here in the United States, or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere - that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot." April 19, 2002

[brick tamland]

^
Yeah hopefully more people will realise that 911 was a multi-purpose false flag operation. 15 years later the plotters are still walking the streets as free as you and I.

[Rob Banks]

Here's one I don't here talked about a whole lot:

Osama bin Laden was supposedly killed by the US military in May of 2011. However, there was no pictures of the body, and he was buried at sea before anyone could identify the body. Sounds suspicious if you ask me. Bin Laden could possibly be alive, or could have possibly have already been dead for years.

Also, Justice Scalia's death was suspicious from the very beginning with no autopsy and no witnesses. Plus, check out what Wikileaks just uncovered:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/...ssination/

Looks like a possible murder plot being discussed between John Podesta (Hillary's campaign manager) and some lobbyist in Washington. Keep in mind the email was sent 4 days before Scalia's death.

[LeoneVolpe]

(09-18-2016 05:10 PM)BrewDog Wrote:  

I'm fascinated by 9/11. We hunted OBL for over a decade, and the USA never indicted him for the attacks. I was working for the US government at the time, and Bin Laden's Most Wanted poster was in our office. Years after 9/11 his wanted poster said nothing about 9/11, it said he was wanted for the bombings of the American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

https://thingseverybodyshouldknow.files....=439&h=513

Here is the most notorious criminal in history that led to the US invasion of Afghanistan, yet he is never even indicted by a federal grand jury, nor does his FBI poster say for over a decade that he is wanted for the 9/11 attacks. Was the FBI simply too busy to update the poster for the number one most wanted man in history?

No one took credit for the 9/11 attacks for months. What's the point of a terrorist attack for a political stance if you don't claim the attack? In fact, Bin Laden said he and Al Qaeda had nothing to do with 9/11 at least three times in the weeks following 9/11.

--"I stress that I have not carried out this act, which appears to have been carried out by individuals with their own motivation." -Osama Bin Laden 9/16/2001

--"I have already said that I am not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act." -Osama Bin Laden 9/28/2001

OBL also said that Al Qaeda's fight had never been against the common man but only with the US government. And that this was obviously an attack against the common man. All of Al Qaeda's attacks to this point had been vs. US government targets. US Embassies and the USS Cole.

Then the CIA releases a video of "Bin Laden" claiming culpability for the attacks. It's now referred to as the "Fatty Osama video." OBL is a very tall, thin man. 6'4"-160 pounds. In the CIA video used as evidence against Al Qaeda, OBL is wearing a military field jacket and has gained over 100 pounds in less than a month. He's also writing with his right hand. OBL is left handed. The CIA was caught lying and creating a false video. Look up the Fatty Osama video online.
===========================
"We've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming." —Dick Cheney, Interview by Tony Snow", March 29, 2006

"9/11 is not mentioned on Bin Laden's Most Wanted page. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connected Bin Laden to 9/11." —FBI agent Rex Tomb, June 6, 2006

On September 16, 2001, CNN reported that in a statement issued to Al Jazeera, bin Laden said, "I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks". "On September 20, 2001," according to the Guardian, "the Taliban offered to hand Osama bin Laden to a neutral Islamic country for trial if the US presented them with evidence that he was responsible for the attacks on New York and Washington. The US rejected the offer."

FBI Director Robert Mueller: "In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper - either here in the United States, or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere - that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot." April 19, 2002

I always found it suspicious that during the same period of time the mainstream media was promoting the fuck out of the "Royal Wedding" between Prince William and Kate Middleton just so happened to be right around the time the U.S. government supposedly found and killed Osama Bin Laden.

In a truly odd "coincidence" Osama Bin Laden and Adolph Hitler apparently died on the same day, well, at least the announcements of their deaths occurred on the same day. We know the elites like to play around with numbers (9/11) and I wouldn't be surprised if they chose this date on purpose rather than something that organically occurred.

If WikiLeaks has taught us anything, it's the political establishment and mainstream media are in bed together. As such, I believe the government instructed the media to promote the living shit out of the Royal Wedding as a smokescreen to divert public attention away from the government while they rolled out the B.S. Bin Laden death story.

Oh, and all the members of Seal Team Six (the team that supposedly killed Bin Laden) were supposedly killed in a helicopter crash not long after the Bin Laden raid. How convenient that those loose ends were tied up so neatly, huh?

I remember thinking at the time all this was going on that something big was going to happen because of how the Royal Wedding was absolutely dominating the news cycles and sure enough...It just reminds me of that scene from the 2001 movie "Swordfish"


"Misdirection. What the eyes see and the ears hear, the mind believes."

[GetRichOrdie]

the best conspiracy theory is that Aladdin bin-laden and his band of magic thieves going around the laws of physics by flying in on magic carpets, bypassing the worlds most sophisticated air defense system, hijacked and crashed several passenger jet planes with box cutters and no training, then knocked down 3 buildings with two jets, and vaporized fire reinforced steel columns towards the path of greatest resistance. Its obviously too ridiculous to describe further and over 2000 demolition and building experts agree as well via the AE911TRUTH website

[sterling_archer]

Look at ISGP website about 9/11, they have most tedious research done about the subject and concluded following:
- OBL was ONE OF the figures involved
- main figures in the story are military industrial complex, also called Conservative Establishment (one of 3 rulers of USA)
- terrorists really hijacked airplanes and flew them into Pentagon and Twins, but termite was placed by american conspirators before
- it was a true joint task force operation involving ISI, CIA and Mossad

[Vinny]

(10-17-2016 10:35 AM)GetRichOrdie Wrote:  

the best conspiracy theory is that Aladdin bin-laden and his band of magic thieves going around the laws of physics by flying in on magic carpets, bypassing the worlds most sophisticated air defense system, hijacked and crashed several passenger jet planes with box cutters and no training, then knocked down 3 buildings with two jets, and vaporized fire reinforced steel columns towards the path of greatest resistance. Its obviously too ridiculous to describe further and over 2000 demolition and building experts agree as well via the AE911TRUTH website