[Dusty]

The excellent James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal exposed the kangaroo courts so common on campuses that ruin men's reputations after a women charges "regret rape."

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10...on_LEADTop

Reading between the lines, it sound like this girl asked her boyfriend for anal, he gave it too her, she regretted it and felt ashamed, so she accused him of rape.

The courts threw out the case due to lack of evidence, but Auburn found him guilty, expelled him from school, and will arrest him if he ever steps foot on campus the rest of his life.

What was the evidence? She cried. As Taranto says "..in principle a woman's tears are sufficient to establish a man's guilt."

It's a long article, here are some excerpts.

Quote:

Joshua Strange will never forget the girl he met in May 2011.

Both were underclassmen at Alabama's Auburn University when a common acquaintance introduced them. "We instantly became attached at the hip and did everything together," she recalled six months later. "I rather quickly moved into his place. . . . Everything was great until pretty much June 29."

That night, an intimate encounter in Mr. Strange's bed went wrong. She called police, who detained him for questioning. She said she had awakened to find him forcing himself on her; he said the sexual activity was consensual and initiated by her. There was no dispute as to the physical acts involved.

Mr. Strange was cleared on both counts. On Feb. 3, 2012, a grand jury handed up a "no bill" indictment on the sodomy charge, meaning the evidence was insufficient to establish probable cause for prosecution. On May 24, when the simple-assault case went to trial, the accuser didn't show up. "I don't have a witness to go forward with, your honor," said city attorney Michael Short. Case dismissed.

Auburn expelled him after a campus tribunal found him "responsible" for committing the catchall offense of "sexual assault and/or sexual harassment."

Joshua Strange, now 23, is a civilian casualty in the Obama administration's war on men. In an April 2011 directive, Russlyn Ali, then assistant education secretary for civil rights, threatened to withhold federal money from any educational institution that failed to take a hard enough line against sexual misconduct to ensure "that all students feel safe in their school." The result was to leave accused students more vulnerable to false charges and unfair procedures. The prospect of losing federal funds has left university administrators "crippled by panic," Robert Shibley of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education told me. "The incentives are pointing toward findings of guilt, not accurate findings."

The grand jury found there wasn't even probable cause, a looser standard than preponderance of the evidence. But the university hearing that yielded his expulsion was a travesty of a legal process.

Mr. Dodge asked Ms. Taylor to describe "typical behaviors" of "somebody who may have undergone a sexual assault." She listed three. First, "they frequently cry." Second, "their storytelling is sometimes disjointed, sometimes not." Third, "there's often a lot of emotion inserted into the story that is about being very upset or in disbelief or unsure what to do next, petrified."

The second "behavior" is tautological; every story either is or is not disjointed. The third is a windy elaboration of the first. Thus Ms. Taylor's testimony amounted to a claim that in principle a woman's tears are sufficient to establish a man's guilt—an inane stereotype that infantilizes women in the interest of vilifying men.

The university flaunted its contempt for the defendant's right to confront his accuser. According to Mr. Strange, a curtain was hung in the hearing room to shield her from his view. And although the panelists were permitted to question witnesses, there was no cross-examination.

Auburn expelled him after a campus tribunal found him "responsible" for committing the catchall offense of "sexual assault and/or sexual harassment." A letter from Melvin Owens, head of the campus police, explained that expulsion is a life sentence. If Mr. Strange ever sets foot on Auburn property, he will be "arrested for Criminal Trespass Third," Mr. Owens warned.

[MrXY]

Notice the line about the federal government now controlling school's internal policies

This was a hidden agenda in the fed gov's takeover of all student loans

Fed bureaucrats have already said that schools will have to "comply" with federal policies if they want student loan money

This gives the Left enormous political control of over what schools teach, who they admit, who they hire to teach and student policies

If you think campus political correctness has been bad-it's going to get much, much worse.

[JohnKreese]

Props to the author for writing the story and getting it published. It really does hit on a number of important elements, already discussed:

A. Bitches filing false-charges
B. Federal control over university functions through bully statutes
C. Student judiciary hearings (are still, and always have been, fucking jokes)

[lurker]

Strange sued in the Middle District of Alabama a year and a half ago.

http://dockets.justia.com/docket/alabama...0136/47449

Named in the suit was a Sara Beth Frazier, who appears to be the girl.

From her twitter feed, @AUsarabeth: @suttoda one thing all men should know about women: we change our minds.. A lot. Just accept it.

[Dusty]

(12-07-2013 02:51 PM)lurker Wrote:  

Strange sued in the Middle District of Alabama a year and a half ago.

http://dockets.justia.com/docket/alabama...0136/47449

Named in the suit was a Sara Beth Frazier, who appears to be the girl.

From her twitter feed, @AUsarabeth: @suttoda one thing all men should know about women: we change our minds.. A lot. Just accept it.

Good find.

It looks like you can download the complaint for a small fee. I might do it to get the details, unless someone knows where we can find it for free.

http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/other...documents/

[lurker]

(12-07-2013 03:01 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

(12-07-2013 02:51 PM)lurker Wrote:  

Strange sued in the Middle District of Alabama a year and a half ago.

http://dockets.justia.com/docket/alabama...0136/47449

Named in the suit was a Sara Beth Frazier, who appears to be the girl.

From her twitter feed, @AUsarabeth: @suttoda one thing all men should know about women: we change our minds.. A lot. Just accept it.

Good find.

It looks like you can download the complaint for a small fee. I might do it to get the details, unless someone knows where we can find it for free.

http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/other...documents/

PACER. Maybe Westlaw/Lexis. I'm not putting that effort into it.

[The Lizard of Oz]

This story deserves more attention.

I think guys here still don't fully realize that there are nightmarish kangaroo courts in colleges all over the country ready to go into action expelling young dudes from colleges and going a long way toward ruining their reputations and their lives on the least say-so of any female.

If you want to make your blood boil, read some of the kangaroo court transcripts from the article:

Quote:

At the hearing, Ms. McCallister proclaimed the accuser "very credible" and attested to the belief that Mr. Strange was "a potential threat to [the accuser's] safety." But Ms. McCallister disavowed knowledge even of the accuser's version of events. "As a safe-harbor advocate, I really don't need to know a lot of details, and so I didn't ask her to go into great detail," Ms. McCallister said. "I don't really want survivors to have to tell their story over and over again."

Ms. McCallister had referred the accuser to Kelley Taylor, the university's sex-discrimination enforcer and the accuser's second witness. Ms. Taylor also described the accuser as "credible" and added that she found the allegation "very compelling."

Mr. Dodge asked Ms. Taylor to describe "typical behaviors" of "somebody who may have undergone a sexual assault." She listed three. First, "they frequently cry." Second, "their storytelling is sometimes disjointed, sometimes not." Third, "there's often a lot of emotion inserted into the story that is about being very upset or in disbelief or unsure what to do next, petrified."

There is an explicit policy that essentially means that for the purposes of expelling a guy from a college, the word of an accuser is good enough.

The "survivor" is always right.

So when I see an entry like this with a "survivor" hashtag on the unspeakably vile "microagressions" site, I know that it very possibly means that this cunt ruined some young dude's life "over spring break":

Quote:

I got home from college, and my mother called me a man-hater when I told her that I became a feminist. This was right after I told her about my sexual assault over spring break.

It made me feel really upset. I felt like I had just worked up the courage over about a month and a half to tell her something really important and it was ignored because I identify with a group that seems to be unpopular for a reason that escapes me. It made me feel kind of worthless, honestly; if my own mother won’t take me seriously, then who will?

gender
survivor

[Dusty]

(12-14-2013 12:02 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  

There is an explicit policy that essentially means that for the purposes of expelling a guy from a college, the word of an accuser is good enough.

The "survivor" is always right.

How do we get it to end?

Maybe men should start accusing vile feminist on campus of raping them. Yes, it's lying and ridiculous, but maybe this is what has to be done to expose the absurdity of "the accuser is always right" policies of these kangaroo courts. Overwhelm them with absurd cases. Ratfucking.

[Dusty]

(12-14-2013 12:44 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

[quote='The Lizard of Oz' pid='603830' dateline='1387040578']
There is an explicit policy that essentially means that for the purposes of expelling a guy from a college, the word of an accuser is good enough.

The "survivor" is always right.

How do we get it to end?

Maybe men should start accusing vile feminist on campus of raping them. Yes, it's lying and ridiculous, but maybe this is what has to be done to expose the absurdity of "the accuser is always right" policies of these kangaroo courts. Overwhelm them with absurd cases. Turn the table on the feminist. Even start accusing the female and mangina administrators of rape and harassment. Let them see how it feels to be accused of false charges. Ratfucking.