[Alpone]

Rollo Tomassi makes a good point about feminist hypocrisy in the media's treatment of Roosh vs. That Married Slut Who Banged 12 Dudes To "Save Marriage"

http://therationalmale.com/2015/03/16/ma...ment-92583

Quote:

You want the real irony here? Roosh can spend 9 years traveling the world, banging women in different countries with relative degrees of success and write more than half a dozen books about his experiences.

The media here and abroad paint him as a misogynist monster, a sex tourist predator or a deeply bitter man who’s a potential or borderline rapist.

Rinaldi takes a year off from her marriage, bangs at least 12 consecutive guys inside that year, expects her Beta husband to lie down for it with rationalizations of “working on their marriage”, then writes one book that becomes an instant best-seller.

Her (albeit salacious) behavior is characterized as ‘empowerment’ by fem-centric media, no writer dares call her so much as a slut, and her rationales of YOLO fairplay inspire women’s inherent need of self-righteous indignation.

Movie prospects and talk-show bookings come from all angles.

In case you want to read about this Rinaldi slut, here's her story:

http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/boo...eview.html

This is a perfect example of how the FemCentric media portrays men and tries to shame them for normal sexual desire. Meanwhile, women are given a free pass to cheat on their husbands in the name of Empowerment.

Feminism has outlived its usefulness and is now just an excuse to put women completely beyond reproach. Expect more hypergamy-run-amok stories like this in mainstream media in the future.

[iamdegaussed]

Amount of women who will see their lives improve based on Rinaldi's 'advice' vs. men who see theirs improved via Roosh's?

Interested in those numbers.

[Tactician]

Heartiste touched on this:
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2015/03/...-underway/

Quote:

A couple weeks ago, CH wrote:

Mark my words, a massive elite push to legitimize and maybe even codify polyamory is next on the agenda.

A day ago, a mainstream Hivemind megaphone had an article about some old skank who slept with a bunch of losers while her cucked beta husband — although bless him he managed to prevent this feminist crone from reproducing — meekly acquiesced to his wife’s spiritual eatpraycumguzzle journey. Oh, and the raging narcissist wrote a book about it all.

Get ready for “The Wild Oats Project.” And not just the book. Get ready for “The Wild Oats Project” phenomenon — the debates, the think pieces, the imitators and probably the movie. Get ready for orgasmic meditation and the Three Rules. Get ready for “My Clitoris Deals Solely in Truth” T-shirts.

The reader who forwarded the article noted, “Are you psychic? Right on queue the mainstream media shows up with a trial balloon for polyamory.”

Psychic? Only a little. Mostly, leftoids are just really easy to read.

Yep, open marriages full of wonder and free of hostility or jealousy will be the newest old frontier the replicant Leftoid Industries will attempt to normalize as authentically human. After that’s accomplished (bet on it), gay pederasty is next.

Legal and social sanction of polyamory is not the same as widespread embrace of the sex at dawn lifestyle. That hoped-for popular embrace of polyamory by the left-behinds of society may never come, if current arrangements are indicative of future compositions. FACT: Most open polyamorists are hideously ugly. Polyamory is not the free choice of physically and psychologically attractive people. FACT: The typical nasty three-way in a willingly conjoined open relationship is one leather-faced high T cougar whose labia could survive the chemical bath of deep sea volcanic vents, one wretched, low T omega male “primary” whose job it is to sniff the cuckcum in his wanton whore’s granny panties and masturbate, and one slightly higher T (or, more accurately, lower E) beta male who couldn’t afford an internet connection for better quality virtual vagina.

Ad revenue for major Hivemind media organs has been dropping like a stone. I guess they’ve decided to say “fuck it” to serious journalism and let loose with the technicolor ejaculate of their gnarled ids.

https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2015/03/...hypergamy/

Quote:

Rollo comments, concerning the de-stigmatization of polyamory subject,

Making Up for Missing Out:

On a social scale it seem like the next deductive next step – blend a justifiable Eat Pray Love narrative with the more visceral (yet unignorable) sexuality of 50 Shades and women will readily consume it. I expect there will be the same hamster spinnings of NAWALT and most women respect their marriage vows, but it still wont wash with the overwhelming ‘guilty pleasure’ popularity that 50 Shades exposed on a large scale.

Writers like Rinaldi and E.L. James have tapped into the Alpha Fucks / Beta Bucks anxiety rooted in women’s primal insecurity inherent in doubting their optimization of Hypergamy. If appealing to visceral sex sells products to men, appealing to the inherent ‘you-only-live-once’ insecurity of feminine Hypergamy sells to women – and women being the primary consumers in western society, sell it does.

EatPrayGetPumpedAndDumped plus 50 Shades is the event horizon of civilizational decadence and decline. Once that Boobicon is crossed, it’s a rapid swirl down the toilet bowl. Give women the run of the place and the Swirl is the inevitable result.

I believe the Roman Empire in its waning years was also marked by sexual libertinism, especially of their women. Weimar Germany, too, before its rebirth under a patriarchal epoch which unfortunately insufficiently and belatedly weeded out the psychopaths who are otherwise so crucial to the early stages of revolution, welcomed the indignities of wanton women pursuing the alpha fux/beta bux (sometimes not even bothering with the beta bux) lifestyle.

A telling societal signal of imminent collapse is the glorification and commercialization of the worst instincts of women, and the denigration of the best instincts of men. Our women become like men, and our men like women, until an androgynous slop characterizes an empire wheezing its last.

For a small but portentous example of this radical change, just read the title of the latest attention whore du jour’s memoir: “The Wild Oats Project”. Sowing one’s wild oats used to be the prerogative of men, or at least the excusable offense of men, and this was widely understood by men and women. Now the modern aggrocunt and her mewling manlet sidekick want to assume the wild oats mantle for aging hags and urban brunchettes, while denying the same fun to men whose testes haven’t yet climbed north to hibernate.

The cultural message is unmistakable: The clit is the new cock. But this message is wrapped in a fairy tale with a very dark ending. Women can no more play the man’s game than men can play the woman’s game. Not for long, at any rate, and not without a gnawing unhappiness that corrodes the soul.

[magicone]

This review of Rinaldi´s book hits the right spot:

"The word "bravery" has been used often in reviews of this woman's book. No, she's not brave for sharing her "journey." Rather, she knew by the nature of the American public that such a book would make her a lot of money. Bravery is a term to reserve for people who do something sacrificially for others, not people who satiate their own lusts. And never in the history of mankind until our permissive era, would this have been called by a word as ridiculous as "journey." It's far from a journey; it was merely indulgence of her bodily instincts."

[CleanSlate]

There goes any notion of me getting married ever again, even to a young virgin. Because 10-20 years later, she'll feel she missed out on cock variety and try to make up for it.

[Chunnel]

Walls may have ears but they certainly don't have eyes

[Fortis]

Even before this site I knew that whenever a couple was in an open-relationship or Polyamorous that the guy did not stand to benefit from that whatsoever. The woman is usually the one to push for that because she wants her cock and wants to eat it too. The guy was usually a push over who knew he couldn't dump her ass and do better (or he was so brainwashed that he didn't know his value), so she would walk all over him and mask it as "an open relationship" AKA "cocks, cocks, cocks, cocks and more cocks."

Remember the words of our fallen prophet da GBFM: one cock rule!

[MMX2010]

I love the viciousness of Heartiste's writing.

All men should memorize the one-liners, "But, to his credit, he didn't allow that femicunt to reproduce..." and "The clit is the new cock." and "I love how the media describe her as brave, as if what she did was on the same level as the men in World War II, who would fight the enemy for thirty straight days, shells exploding, people dying, and no one crying. For people who claim not to need men, you're obsessed with poorly competing against them." Then say them with a straight face in mixed company.

(Thanks to, I think, The Lizard of Oz, who said that last one-liner.)

[Foolsgo1d]

Eh, I wouldn't seem surprised. My exposure to the swingers world made me realise just how pathetic a legion of men could be and they always rationalise it away.

Its hamster Vs hamster in that world and the female hamster wins out 9/10.