NOTE: This is a response to an article posted by Matt Forney here. I promised to reply directly to the thread, but my response grew fairly long, so I thought it merited its own thread.
![[Image: perfectionism.jpg]](http://www.mentalhealth.com/fig/perfectionism.jpg)
This article has reaffirmed my assertions about the rotten psychology of feminism: narcissistic moral puritanism.
I know I talk about narcissism quite a bit, but if I was to hazard a guess, this woman is a clinical narcissist. Not just somebody who would get diagnosed with some narcissistic traits, but full-blown narcissism.
Most revealing quote:
Citing authority figures about what makes YOU happy, then stating that smiling probably makes you feel better? You should know what makes you happy, unless you don't have any feelings. She could have some sociopathic traits, but I don't know too much about that issue so I will leave it.
This woman thinks everything in life is a performance aimed at getting other's approval. That is narcissism. Her own personal history at fumbling towards a sense of self by seeking other's approval is always a failed way to gain real self-esteem. You know, why narcissism isn't a proper way to value yourself - at all.
Deep down, this woman hates women. She is a dyed-in-wool misogynist. She pretends everybody else hates women - and that is evidenced in her mind by how they treat HER - but she starts from her and then multiplies by everybody else. She doesn't seem to get the world does not revolve around her and, as such, most people are indifferent towards her. She notes this in her obvious desperation at getting attention. Still, she can't recognize her own puritanism is what causes people to react so badly to her. She transfers her own anger and hatred onto others and then uses their untoward reactions to shore up her sense of self-hatred that she ports out onto women at large. She then transfers that to men to make them think she hates men so men react badly to her, only to have said male reaction shore up her sense of self.
Freud coined the term "penis envy." Freud published some of his thoughts on this topic in an article named "On Narcissism." While I only have passing knowledge of this essay of his, consider he already linked narcissism to penis envy. Take an example: say you see a person, who is a victim of X, suing and getting Y amounts of dollars in court. Often times, people think that it is awesome they got paid and, if they were in the same situation, they would love to be in the same situation. Of course, they would not be paralyzed, lose a limb, have severe emotional distress or be in financial limbo as the case pends. That is a narcissist mode of thought.
What women like the author do with respects to men, male privilege and patriarchy is they utilize a narcissistic frame of mind rooted in hypergamy and female heterosexuality. First, they begin with the idea that men are privileged in society at the expense of women. Their narcissism is supremely upset by this. However, most of these sorts of women are paper narcissists - a form of paper alpha - that they can't actually act our their fantasies of their reality in their head. As such, they need proxies such as women in media or their daughters. Still, in their head, their narcissism begins to fester and run free. They start to fantasize what their life would be like if they were a man.
![[Image: male%2Bprivilge.jpg]](https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-UNINLa2qVdM/T2OMezzpCYI/AAAAAAAABF4/TkESyxtT2oc/s1600/male%2Bprivilge.jpg)
This picture sums up the narcissistic hijacking of Apex Fallacy. This picture assumes they would be highly physically attractive, be able to get your sexual approval and then take your white-collar job. While the picture features women, it is about women pretending to be men. It goes without saying that women assume it is fantastically easy to pick women up, as in their life, romance, lust and sex just happen. He was so effortlessly attractive and romantic. Nah, he just read Day Bang.
Further, she assumes she will be an in-shape, physically attractive male in a white collar profession. Sigh. In these sorts of fantasies, women only consider men they want to get fucked by, instead of considering the remaining 85% of men or whatever the alpha ratio is. They usually ignore non-white men (usually only considering black men as athletes or rappers), poor men, certainly gay men (unless they are those weird women who hyper-identify with gay men - need a post on that), fat men, ugly men, short men, mentally infirm men. Basically any man who isn't at least six-foot, handsome, in shape, high-status job, charismatic, healthy psychological profile, family-oriented, etc., etc.
Further, she doesn't have ability to be that man, but to not snag such a man in real life.
Note the article mentioned nothing about the father. Still, women like her agitate against patriarchy, beauty standards and all that not because they are against them in principle, but because they are not benefited by them. If women like her snagged alpha males, she wouldn't say shit. You wouldn't even know her in the media.
Since she can't be her own person she desires to be, she needs her daughter to be that woman.
First off, desiring your child to be X, Y, or Z isn't unhealthy - forcing them to be is. Isn't amazing these radical feminists always seem to have non-conforming children? Oh, its because gender truly is a social construction. No, no its not. She needs to oppress her son brutally, just like she thinks she has been as a woman. Seriously, a woman living in the 1990's was brutally oppressed? Oh, wait, she means by way of her parents. Once again, she multiplies her times the nation and decides every woman had a terrible childhood like her.
She forces her daughter to be the radical, angry and hateful feminist she could never be in real life. In her life, she was the woman "smiling at her date rapist." Not only does she engage in immature levels of hyperbole to prove her "point," she has completely unrealistic levels of success for her daughter. Running the country, saving the world? Are you still in Women's Studies 101 freshman year? If your daughter grows up be a successful doctor, district manager for Taco Bell or small business owner she is doing better than most of the nation. Not only that, but what about her desires for life? District managers for Taco Bell's make something like 70-80 G's a year, right? Sounds like a very comfortable life. Why does she need to crash the glass ceiling? Maybe she only wants to be a manager of a Taco Bell. You want her to be happy and do what she wants, right? She doesn't need to save the world from themselves while being President. Oh wait, that is what you wanted to be and could never be. All these years of fantasizing and failing has resulted in a ton of unused emotional energy that you are directly solely at your narcissistic proxy: your daughter.
I have seen this first hand in my family, but won't talk about it specifically. What this women is doing porting her own personal terror over becoming somebody (i.e. you get defined by your actions by others) and hijacks her daughters life. Her daughter's surly disposition reflects her mother's desire to lash out against society and individuals. Notice how her mother easily rails against symbols of oppression and authority (the patriarchy, male privilege, anti-woman institutions) but suddenly curls up and suborns herself to actual human representations of said authority.
![[Image: Belvedere-vodka-ad-620x572.jpg]](http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Belvedere-vodka-ad-620x572.jpg)
FUCK RAPE CULTURE THAT OUR SOCIETY ENDORSES
Uhh, yeah, I guess I consent to sex
She needs to use her daughter to actually rail against the people she never had the gumption to do as a child. Notice how she talks about her childhood, teenage years and twenties. She is imagining her daughter tackling everything she was too weak to tackle in her youth. This isn't her daughter's life, it is hers.
This is the final nail in the coffin. Even a family friend admits she is moral, which in our society often indicates said person is a moral puritan. Her daughter's insistence on formalized rules, to the point of driving people up the wall, strongly suggests she suffers from obsessive compulsive personality disorder, referred to as moral puritanism by me.
Feminists like the author often think the correct antidote to rape, sexism, patriarchy and all that is a brutal level of oppression on expression based off censorship, ostracism and severe levels of punishment. Her daughter will become a woman we all know, when you make one, just one, off-color remark about women. She will take it as if you just called every woman a worthless whore who deserves only to be raped. Only able to see the world in childish black and whites, they are completely unable to distinguish the world morally. The world is morally ambiguous, but they will never understand that.
Her daughter's insistence on a strict adherence to authoritatively established rules is telling. It isn't lost on me that her mother always capitalized God in the piece. Curious that a feminist is invoking God? No, women like the author believe in a god, just not one in the Christian Bible.They worship at the foot of a god, just what that god is narcissistically determined by themselves. They often use feminist doctrine as scripture and often deify the US government, or the arc of liberalism. Either way, they have clear objects of worship that cannot fail themselves.
To conclude this, consider one of her final sentences:
Violating insignificant rules? Check
Believing you don't matter? Check
Sounds like you think you only matter when you get other's approval based on your adherence to the rules. Narcissistic moral puritanism. You only matter when others approve of you, insofar as you adhere to rules handed down by authority figures. She is so "liberated" that she thinks she is outside the matrix, breaking it down. She isn't. She is completely inside the matrix.
This woman, in her rebellion against patriarchal society, manages to do nothing to press against the untoward psychology visited upon her. Instead, she tries to shunt it through her twisted views of the world. She is like the ending of some horror movies, thinking they have survived the slaughter, only to get the obligatory ax in the back of the head at the end, as they never escaped the matrix.
A sad comment, which got 55 upvotes, stated this:
You know, this piece could have spawned much more commentary from me. I have learned most people don't give two shits about anybody that isn't them. Her daughter is an object, a secondary being - a chess piece. There is no difference here - the daughter is being used a proxy for the mother. The daughter won't be fine. This dipshit seems to think the daughter's difference from her mother is "fine," no its not. The daughter's difference is based out of her mother's omnipresence influence. There is a real difference, as the daughter will have a different life than the mother. Psychologically, they are the same.
![[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTGNkhHQI1CouqKW2zuk1K...qy6SMrZZTw]](https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTGNkhHQI1CouqKW2zuk1K333SxiA_GpMaW9UIlRR8Yqy6SMrZZTw)
This poor daughter will never have a chance. She will only see the world in terms of her mother's hateful, delusional outlook. When some man says he would love to have sex with a woman, she will hear a man who feels entitled to a woman's body, instead of man who is expressing his heterosexuality.
The funny thing is that the author's daughter will become the social pariah she wanted to be but never could become. The author's desire to lash out - that was never accomplished - will be accomplished by her daughter. The mother will pretend to be worried sick over her daughter's rebellion, but she will be supremely interested in what reactions her daughter engenders. If her daughter is ignored for her behavior, you have to watch out. The author could either withdraw attention to her daughter completely or push her daughter across the line in order to get attention.
This female chess piece of daughter is nothing more than an illusion, a creation. Her life is nothing more than a supreme construction by a deluded female narcissist. It isn't funny nor ironic that a feminist narcissist created this world for a girl.
I truly wish I could create an eulogy for youth lost. I have tried. You can't replace lost youth.
The past is always in the past.
That is how life works.
This article has reaffirmed my assertions about the rotten psychology of feminism: narcissistic moral puritanism.
I know I talk about narcissism quite a bit, but if I was to hazard a guess, this woman is a clinical narcissist. Not just somebody who would get diagnosed with some narcissistic traits, but full-blown narcissism.
Most revealing quote:
Quote:Quote:
Plus, smiling probably makes me feel happier, according to all those studies about self-fulfilling emotional prophesies.
Citing authority figures about what makes YOU happy, then stating that smiling probably makes you feel better? You should know what makes you happy, unless you don't have any feelings. She could have some sociopathic traits, but I don't know too much about that issue so I will leave it.
This woman thinks everything in life is a performance aimed at getting other's approval. That is narcissism. Her own personal history at fumbling towards a sense of self by seeking other's approval is always a failed way to gain real self-esteem. You know, why narcissism isn't a proper way to value yourself - at all.
Deep down, this woman hates women. She is a dyed-in-wool misogynist. She pretends everybody else hates women - and that is evidenced in her mind by how they treat HER - but she starts from her and then multiplies by everybody else. She doesn't seem to get the world does not revolve around her and, as such, most people are indifferent towards her. She notes this in her obvious desperation at getting attention. Still, she can't recognize her own puritanism is what causes people to react so badly to her. She transfers her own anger and hatred onto others and then uses their untoward reactions to shore up her sense of self-hatred that she ports out onto women at large. She then transfers that to men to make them think she hates men so men react badly to her, only to have said male reaction shore up her sense of self.
Freud coined the term "penis envy." Freud published some of his thoughts on this topic in an article named "On Narcissism." While I only have passing knowledge of this essay of his, consider he already linked narcissism to penis envy. Take an example: say you see a person, who is a victim of X, suing and getting Y amounts of dollars in court. Often times, people think that it is awesome they got paid and, if they were in the same situation, they would love to be in the same situation. Of course, they would not be paralyzed, lose a limb, have severe emotional distress or be in financial limbo as the case pends. That is a narcissist mode of thought.
What women like the author do with respects to men, male privilege and patriarchy is they utilize a narcissistic frame of mind rooted in hypergamy and female heterosexuality. First, they begin with the idea that men are privileged in society at the expense of women. Their narcissism is supremely upset by this. However, most of these sorts of women are paper narcissists - a form of paper alpha - that they can't actually act our their fantasies of their reality in their head. As such, they need proxies such as women in media or their daughters. Still, in their head, their narcissism begins to fester and run free. They start to fantasize what their life would be like if they were a man.
This picture sums up the narcissistic hijacking of Apex Fallacy. This picture assumes they would be highly physically attractive, be able to get your sexual approval and then take your white-collar job. While the picture features women, it is about women pretending to be men. It goes without saying that women assume it is fantastically easy to pick women up, as in their life, romance, lust and sex just happen. He was so effortlessly attractive and romantic. Nah, he just read Day Bang.
Further, she assumes she will be an in-shape, physically attractive male in a white collar profession. Sigh. In these sorts of fantasies, women only consider men they want to get fucked by, instead of considering the remaining 85% of men or whatever the alpha ratio is. They usually ignore non-white men (usually only considering black men as athletes or rappers), poor men, certainly gay men (unless they are those weird women who hyper-identify with gay men - need a post on that), fat men, ugly men, short men, mentally infirm men. Basically any man who isn't at least six-foot, handsome, in shape, high-status job, charismatic, healthy psychological profile, family-oriented, etc., etc.
Further, she doesn't have ability to be that man, but to not snag such a man in real life.
Note the article mentioned nothing about the father. Still, women like her agitate against patriarchy, beauty standards and all that not because they are against them in principle, but because they are not benefited by them. If women like her snagged alpha males, she wouldn't say shit. You wouldn't even know her in the media.
Since she can't be her own person she desires to be, she needs her daughter to be that woman.
Quote:Quote:
I picture her at the prom in stripy cotton pajamas, eating potato chips with both hands. I picture her slapping a patriarch-damning sticker on her jacket. I picture her running the country, saving the world, being exactly the kind of good bad girl that she knows herself to be. And I think: You go. I think: Fly! I think: Take me with you
First off, desiring your child to be X, Y, or Z isn't unhealthy - forcing them to be is. Isn't amazing these radical feminists always seem to have non-conforming children? Oh, its because gender truly is a social construction. No, no its not. She needs to oppress her son brutally, just like she thinks she has been as a woman. Seriously, a woman living in the 1990's was brutally oppressed? Oh, wait, she means by way of her parents. Once again, she multiplies her times the nation and decides every woman had a terrible childhood like her.
She forces her daughter to be the radical, angry and hateful feminist she could never be in real life. In her life, she was the woman "smiling at her date rapist." Not only does she engage in immature levels of hyperbole to prove her "point," she has completely unrealistic levels of success for her daughter. Running the country, saving the world? Are you still in Women's Studies 101 freshman year? If your daughter grows up be a successful doctor, district manager for Taco Bell or small business owner she is doing better than most of the nation. Not only that, but what about her desires for life? District managers for Taco Bell's make something like 70-80 G's a year, right? Sounds like a very comfortable life. Why does she need to crash the glass ceiling? Maybe she only wants to be a manager of a Taco Bell. You want her to be happy and do what she wants, right? She doesn't need to save the world from themselves while being President. Oh wait, that is what you wanted to be and could never be. All these years of fantasizing and failing has resulted in a ton of unused emotional energy that you are directly solely at your narcissistic proxy: your daughter.
I have seen this first hand in my family, but won't talk about it specifically. What this women is doing porting her own personal terror over becoming somebody (i.e. you get defined by your actions by others) and hijacks her daughters life. Her daughter's surly disposition reflects her mother's desire to lash out against society and individuals. Notice how her mother easily rails against symbols of oppression and authority (the patriarchy, male privilege, anti-woman institutions) but suddenly curls up and suborns herself to actual human representations of said authority.
FUCK RAPE CULTURE THAT OUR SOCIETY ENDORSES
Uhh, yeah, I guess I consent to sex
She needs to use her daughter to actually rail against the people she never had the gumption to do as a child. Notice how she talks about her childhood, teenage years and twenties. She is imagining her daughter tackling everything she was too weak to tackle in her youth. This isn't her daughter's life, it is hers.
Quote:Quote:
“She’s very moral,” a friend said recently, and it was not a compliment. She is the kid who can be a pain the neck at a play date, insisting on the rigors of turn-taking, of fair-sharing, of tidying up before the guests vamoose and leave her with an afternoon of mess to deal with.
This is the final nail in the coffin. Even a family friend admits she is moral, which in our society often indicates said person is a moral puritan. Her daughter's insistence on formalized rules, to the point of driving people up the wall, strongly suggests she suffers from obsessive compulsive personality disorder, referred to as moral puritanism by me.
Feminists like the author often think the correct antidote to rape, sexism, patriarchy and all that is a brutal level of oppression on expression based off censorship, ostracism and severe levels of punishment. Her daughter will become a woman we all know, when you make one, just one, off-color remark about women. She will take it as if you just called every woman a worthless whore who deserves only to be raped. Only able to see the world in childish black and whites, they are completely unable to distinguish the world morally. The world is morally ambiguous, but they will never understand that.
Her daughter's insistence on a strict adherence to authoritatively established rules is telling. It isn't lost on me that her mother always capitalized God in the piece. Curious that a feminist is invoking God? No, women like the author believe in a god, just not one in the Christian Bible.They worship at the foot of a god, just what that god is narcissistically determined by themselves. They often use feminist doctrine as scripture and often deify the US government, or the arc of liberalism. Either way, they have clear objects of worship that cannot fail themselves.
To conclude this, consider one of her final sentences:
Quote:Quote:
...apologizing for some vague but enormous infraction, like the very fact of her own existence.
Violating insignificant rules? Check
Believing you don't matter? Check
Sounds like you think you only matter when you get other's approval based on your adherence to the rules. Narcissistic moral puritanism. You only matter when others approve of you, insofar as you adhere to rules handed down by authority figures. She is so "liberated" that she thinks she is outside the matrix, breaking it down. She isn't. She is completely inside the matrix.
This woman, in her rebellion against patriarchal society, manages to do nothing to press against the untoward psychology visited upon her. Instead, she tries to shunt it through her twisted views of the world. She is like the ending of some horror movies, thinking they have survived the slaughter, only to get the obligatory ax in the back of the head at the end, as they never escaped the matrix.
A sad comment, which got 55 upvotes, stated this:
Quote:Quote:
Birdie will be just fine. Please stop seeing difference as pathology.
You know, this piece could have spawned much more commentary from me. I have learned most people don't give two shits about anybody that isn't them. Her daughter is an object, a secondary being - a chess piece. There is no difference here - the daughter is being used a proxy for the mother. The daughter won't be fine. This dipshit seems to think the daughter's difference from her mother is "fine," no its not. The daughter's difference is based out of her mother's omnipresence influence. There is a real difference, as the daughter will have a different life than the mother. Psychologically, they are the same.
This poor daughter will never have a chance. She will only see the world in terms of her mother's hateful, delusional outlook. When some man says he would love to have sex with a woman, she will hear a man who feels entitled to a woman's body, instead of man who is expressing his heterosexuality.
The funny thing is that the author's daughter will become the social pariah she wanted to be but never could become. The author's desire to lash out - that was never accomplished - will be accomplished by her daughter. The mother will pretend to be worried sick over her daughter's rebellion, but she will be supremely interested in what reactions her daughter engenders. If her daughter is ignored for her behavior, you have to watch out. The author could either withdraw attention to her daughter completely or push her daughter across the line in order to get attention.
This female chess piece of daughter is nothing more than an illusion, a creation. Her life is nothing more than a supreme construction by a deluded female narcissist. It isn't funny nor ironic that a feminist narcissist created this world for a girl.
I truly wish I could create an eulogy for youth lost. I have tried. You can't replace lost youth.
The past is always in the past.
That is how life works.
![[Image: birdo-gp.jpg]](http://www.themushroomkingdom.net/images/birdo-gp.jpg)
