Brand has already been condemned for the MSNBC appearance by a feminist at the Guardian:
"If only Russell Brand could use his cleverness for more than humiliation
The star's car-crash interview on MSNBC's Morning Joe showcased his talents – and his penchant for lazy sexism
...
Brand has got form when it comes to humiliating women – his previous maverick media exploits have included detailing the sex he had with a young woman on her grandfather's voicemail, remember – and he really goes for it here. Brzezinski makes a hash of presenting, but Brand goes way below the belt (ahem) when he smirkingly suggests she wants to wank him off.
Ha ha, you have a uterus. Ha ha, you have tits. Ha ha, you're a lady so I bet you want to touch my cock.
It feels odd to accuse Brand of laziness when he's so obviously energetic, but that's exactly what this kind of dull sexism is: lazy. Writing on Thatcher for the Guardian, his criticism of her seemed to revolve around what an unloving mother she must have been.
He's got much better material than this, so I can only assume that he doesn't think a female opponent is worthy of his full comic majesty. (He allegedly didn't think his ex-wife was worthy of more than a text message to inform her he was divorcing her, so maybe there's a theme.)
That old sexist Samuel Johnson said a woman's preaching was "like a dog's walking on his hind legs. It is not done well; but you are surprised to find it done at all." Brand is a kind of vertical hound himself: the rock star reprobate image is so well played, anything clever he says is applauded wildly for its novelty. But he is clever, and rather than letting him deploy that smartness as a tactic to ambush people, maybe we should ask him to be clever enough to treat women as people more of the time."
Link