There are a string of modern femme-fatale who take it upon themselves to spend their me-time reading about the subcultures of society which could be labeled as the "sexually-devient" and it is their aim to understand and, in a sense, identify with these various subcultures.
I don't know how often it is now that I read the opinion section of some online newspaper only to hear how some prostitute is an amazing character who has traits that all women should look up to (sexual and financial independence) and this just strikes me as extremely odd.
Do we, as men, look at the various perverts, voyeurs, trench-coat wearing exhibitionists (also, mind you, a part of the sexual-devient category) and think to ourselves, "hmm, that guy is so courageous for showing off his ding-dong to that random poor girl sitting on the park bench eating her lunch sandwich!"?
No, most likely we don't. So why is it that the women's lib movement finds it alright to look at a prostitute as a role-model? How did feminism go from the want of equality under law, such as the right to divorce, the right to vote, the right to property, etc., to trying to identify with the prostitutes and porn starlettes?
This is how "feminism" went from being known as a righteous cause to a joke. And, this is most likely because feminism lacks a strong male leader to slap it in its place![[Image: banana.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/new/banana.gif)
(hey!).
In a sense, I think feminism needs a new leader, a leader to penetrate the all ladies club and bring some much needed testicles of steel!
Who's with me?!?!![[Image: cheerleader.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/new/cheerleader.gif)
![[Image: treehugger.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/new/treehugger.gif)
![[Image: punchballs.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/new/punchballs.gif)
I don't know how often it is now that I read the opinion section of some online newspaper only to hear how some prostitute is an amazing character who has traits that all women should look up to (sexual and financial independence) and this just strikes me as extremely odd.
Do we, as men, look at the various perverts, voyeurs, trench-coat wearing exhibitionists (also, mind you, a part of the sexual-devient category) and think to ourselves, "hmm, that guy is so courageous for showing off his ding-dong to that random poor girl sitting on the park bench eating her lunch sandwich!"?
No, most likely we don't. So why is it that the women's lib movement finds it alright to look at a prostitute as a role-model? How did feminism go from the want of equality under law, such as the right to divorce, the right to vote, the right to property, etc., to trying to identify with the prostitutes and porn starlettes?
This is how "feminism" went from being known as a righteous cause to a joke. And, this is most likely because feminism lacks a strong male leader to slap it in its place
(hey!). In a sense, I think feminism needs a new leader, a leader to penetrate the all ladies club and bring some much needed testicles of steel!
Who's with me?!?!
