rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Dispatches from the Gay Male Hamster
#1

Dispatches from the Gay Male Hamster

Here is the link:

http://www.malehealth.co.uk/attitudes/18...men-lesson

First off – after reading this I wanted to punch this dirtbag right in the cocksucker.

There is so much in this piece that is exactly what is wrong with the mainstream liberal’s train of thought – seriously, this article is either an absolute goldmine or a horrid abortion, depending on your perspective.

First off, the blank slate idea is dead. This dude says, “The different modes of hetero and homo behavior are, of course, not biologically fixed.” Of course? So let me get this straight (ha), you are born gay or straight – however, what you are attracted or how you act is completely up to your socialization? It doesn’t make any sense – wouldn’t you think people would be born with some instinct about what sex you attracted wants in a mate? Or is it that when babies blink their eyes, their eyelids say “Insert Data?”

Further, when do gay men get this training? He admits gay boys are treated like heterosexual boys until they come out – he suggests it implicitly, not explicitly. Are there remedial classes at Queer Academy for the recently uncloseted? Maybe they get it at the gay club – taking all that jizz up the poop-shoot must trigger empathy in the brain. It tracks the Hugo Schwyzer argument that men need to get pegged to develop empathy with women. Take it up the ass – become a better person.

Okay, enough snark.

Here is my theory: most of the ardent blank-slatists are cocksuckers – in their world, sex just happens. Sure, the phrase “the gay church is the gym” exists, but like women, all they have to do is show up and sex happens. Hell, ugly-ass, fat gay men can still get boned out by other similar gay men. Heterosexual men do NOT get this pass. They have to dominant, beat out and just outshine other men to get laid. They can’t just follow the rules - be a good little beta and get laid. In the past, they usually got wives. Nowadays, they might not even get some 33 year-old fatty to have perfunctory sex with on their birthdays. Gay men don’t understand this – and instead of showing off this empathy that the author claims gay men are famous for – they double on forcing men to be feminized betas.

This brings me to my next point, which is for all this sensitivity and empathy gay men are supposedly conditioned into; gay men like him are completely bereft of what actually happens in straight men’s lives. He never, ever mentions the effects of what men women choose to sleep with. He talks about how women are sick of macho men in their lives – which he conveniently ignores they consensually brought into their lives – and how we need “New Men.” He talks about how many boyfriends have “dominating” behavior – very interesting.

If he had empathy for straight men, he would ask them why they are violent or being macho. The real reason is because women are turned on by it. His link between macho behavior and wife-beating is weak. Violent male behavior is about displaying dominance over other men. Sure, some men resort to illegal behavior, but men can legally dominate others in the boxing ring or on the NFL field.

To a blank-slatist like him, he probably assumes that whatever women are attracted to is determined by society. While I would never assume he would write a screed telling women to take the sexy jerk’s dick out their mouth (he knows his place), he just doubles-down on male-bashing. He probably hasn’t even thought of it. He has obviously takes the feminist approach – just hold men accountable for their behavior and completely ignore how women shape the world around them – the notable exception being if a woman advances a feminist talking point.

My final point involves the black community. His comment about how gay men only fall into gangs because of they are “closeted and ashamed.” This statement implies that gay men only get involved in gangs because of homophobia. Shit, did anybody else note the incessant signaling gay men are nonthreatening to women?

Anyways, his comment is fucking ignorant. The most common reason youth fall into gang behavior – and we are talking more about black youth – is because they didn’t have father figures at home or at school – so they find them in older boys. This often results in black youth joining gangs and committing crimes and doing things they might otherwise not want to do; they are seeking the approval of older males. Further, the behavior is reinforced because they gain access to females they would not have otherwise had a chance to meet.

This puts another nail the coffin of the idea of the “empathetic gay.” He positions himself as fundamentally superior to the straight male and then goes about attacking what straight men do without any reference point as to why. Does this motherfucker (really, fatherfucker) know what empathy means?

Like many liberal commentators, he assumes out of the gate that the reason straight men do the things they do is out of social conditioning and hatred. His use of the word “butch” to describe heterosexual men reinforces the idea he thinks all men are like him – weak, because he assumes the confidence is *just* a facade.

He also is a damn hypocrite because he uses the word “womanizer” disparagingly. Really –I am going to be lectured about a man’s “womanizing” by a fag? Remind me again how many partners the average gay man has. This hyper woman-centric bullshit has to stop. Straight men are womanizing sexists, but the gay man gets to suck off as many dicks as he wants because, “Like, OMG gay empowerment!!!”

Fuck that. The answer to the problems he presents is confident, masculine men. His vision of a pacifistic “New Man” won’t solve the problems he presented; they will exacerbate the problems of the world.

This article really should not have gotten my Irish up, but this sort of smug, self-satisfied beta male bullshit really pisses me the fuck off.

Quote:Old Chinese Man Wrote:  
why you wonder how many man another man bang? why you care who bang who mr high school drama man
Reply
#2

Dispatches from the Gay Male Hamster

Edit: I read wrong. I thought it said "mens health" in the link and thought "well, what did you expect from a gay magazine?"

Just ignore them. Gays are like women in the sense that they all want to feel like the unique pretty little snowflakes that they are.
Reply
#3

Dispatches from the Gay Male Hamster

This does read like some kind of gay magazine, yeah.

I don't like the argument he puts forth because it doesn't really follow (womanizing men are the least violent out of anybody), but whatever. You're going to read more and more dumb shit like this when the gay viewpoint becomes more prevalent in society.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)