[painter]

I was surprised to see this article, Stifling Our Children, in The American Spectator:

http://spectator.org/archives/2013/04/15...r-children

I was even more surprised to see it was written by a female. Some quotes full of red pill wisdom:

"Back in Archie Bunker’s halcyon days, girls were considered children and were treated as such; that is, until they grew up to be women who would assume the honored and vital roles of wives and mothers if they so chose. Now, little girls — once the very epitome of innocence — who formerly scampered happily and unencumbered through childhood in pigtails, are taught that their most important function in life is sex; a notion that was formerly discouraged as detrimental to society, even for grown men."

And:

"As for our boys, quite the opposite is true. In the past, boys were raised to grow into men who were respectful of women and their elders, but during childhood they were expected to show a certain degree of rambunctiousness; as in “boys will be boys.” Now, their boyish ways are drugged out of them by their communal village parents; until, that is, they reach adulthood, where our modern culture encourages them to act as loutish, irresponsible children forever. Confusing? Not really, when you consider that the aim of liberals seeks to keep them docile as regards their former status as heads of households and responsible American guardians of their family’s autonomy and liberty."

These ideas are going "mainstream". Obviously you won't see this on the nightly news or in the New York Times or anywhere else liberals guard feminism and feminist ideas against any logical dialogue or debate, but the fact that more and more articles like this are appearing is very positive.

[Firestorm]

This is just western culture, but i think as immigrant communities increase they will bring their old world values with them.

[Wadsworth]

Tradcon blue pill maximum strength imho

[vinman]

In a time which seems eons ago, our national motto was “In God we trust.” Today, those who would hew to that belief are considered hateful and harmful to society. To paraphrase the eminent author and raconteur G.K. Chesterton — who would have a field day in Barack Obama’s America — those who believe in nothing will believe in anything. Well today, youngsters are counseled, ad nauseam, to “believe in themselves;” as if such belief will accomplish, and even more importantly, excuse anything. And while the little moppets continue in that vein, they are encouraged by their government nannies: as long as that belief comports itself with modern leftists’ twisted templates of gender identity.


This article was a good find.

[Wadsworth]

Sorry I was on my phone for the last post. I want to add something more.

This is the most insidious kind of female. Unlike the feminist who lets you know she hates you, these traditional conservative women hide their contempt for your male ass by stroking your ego, saying things like you're the guardian of autonomy and liberty, but make no mistake, this bitch is not your friend.

This is just another "where have all the good men gone" article but phrased slightly differently. It's just more male shaming. Do your own thing and you're a loutish, irresponsible child. What if men choose not to be protectors and providers? What if men don't want to be married drones anymore? What if men just want to fuck and play video games in their studio apartments until they're in their 80s? This woman wants you to get back on the treadmill and work and provide and protect like a good little married workhorse.

She may sound critical of feminism, but she's perfectly happy keeping all the privileges she's gained via feminism and using her reproductive power to enslave you. If she cared about men she wouldn't be trying to shame them into doing what she wants them to do.

Never fall for this kind of stuff.

[Sonsowey]

(04-15-2013 07:25 PM)vinman Wrote:  

In a time which seems eons ago, our national motto was “In God we trust.” Today, those who would hew to that belief are considered hateful and harmful to society.

In God we Trust was only adopted in 1956.

God is just a made up story. Mature beyond that. It is a stone-age myth. I can't imagine why people still buy that crap.

[A War You Cannot Win]

The premise of an all knowing God who can damn you to an eternity of torture is a useful tool to make a lot of people behave in a civilized manner that's conducive to a functioning society. It's a lot more effective than expecting them to obey laws and regulations because it's the decent thing to do.