http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/inter...lam&st=cse
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/17/world/...etherlands
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/04/world/...etherlands
Here are some pieces I stumbled on over the past several months regarding the Netherlands/Europe and the struggles with Islam/immigration.
I know a couple of women in the Netherlands. One lives in Nijmegen. She's Indian, from Suriname (her family moved to the Netherlands when she was 11, so she's been there about 30 years). She says, because she's very dark, that she gets looks, comments, etc. about being a "terrorist." Her daughter's father is a white Dutchman, but her daughter will never been seen as a citizen, even though she is. I believe people born in territories of the Netherlands (The Netherlands Antilles, Aruba...not sure about Suriname now since they've been independent since '75) are automatically citizens, though they aren't necessarily treated that way.
The immigration debate is alive everywhere - many of the Mediterranean countries in Europe, as well as the US are attempting to deal with it, and are going hardline. Post 9/11, it became intertwined with national security, making it even more heated. One debate I don't really hear delved into is defining integration/assimilation. What does it mean? Does it mean an immigrant must disassociate from all aspects of their own culture and "adopt" the culture of the country they live in, or can they retain what is already theirs, while also adopting aspects of their new country/culture? While I understand the anger/frustration with crime and usurping of services, etc. (I don't like that shit either), there's the other side of the coin. No matter WHAT some people do to assimilate, there's will be pushback based on how they LOOK. Discrimination, both by individuals and institutional is real. So you either have to tighten or close your borders, or grant the same rights of citizenship to all. A government can't dictate the actions of individual citizens, but they can deal harshly with those in violation, be they natural born, or naturalized citizens. But don't let folks in, treat them second-class, then wonder why they lash out, commit crime, etc. Can't have it both ways.
The US is particularly disengenious with regards to immigration. Yeah, politicians grandstand about it, but those same motherfuckers employ illegals (cutting their grass, cooking for them, taking care of their KIDS). Business THRIVES on the cheap labor they provide - some will even tell you they can't stay in business without them. Those same politicos will say no to amnesty. One even proposed they ARREST them for identity fraud (mind you, there's no way an immigrant that can't speak English managed to get papers with a false identity on his or her own - someone on this side of the border procured them. So who's the identity thief?). They want to throw them in prison for a few years (feed the prison industrial complex) so they can now get FREE labor out of them. And THEN they want to deport them. We all know we want a certain flow of cheap labor coming in. What's going on in Arizona is EXTRA. I don't doubt, as a border state, that it's a bigger issue for them than in other states. But randomly pulling over people and asking for papers? Then saying it ISN'T about race? How is that possible? They aren't going to pull over whites, or even blacks claiming probable cause that you might be an illegal. They'll be pulling over Mexicans, period. And they might be Mexicans that have been here for generations, but they won't be treated that way. And since when have Americans had to carry papers proving citizenship? But that's where things are headed. At least for certain people.