[Divorco]

Cupid's Arrow Research

•Very physically attractive women are more likely to form exclusive relationships ... also less likely to have sexual intercourse within the first week of meeting a partner.
•For women, the number of sexual partners decreases with increasing physical attractiveness, whereas for men, the number of sexual partners increases with increasing physical attractiveness.
• Thinner women report fewer partners ... consistent with the finding that more attractive women report fewer sexual partners.

[Giovonny]

In my experience, the opposite is true.

The more sexy a woman is, the more sexual she is!

Generally speaking.

[Timoteo]

I guess the premise behind this is that attractive women don't HAVE to use pussy as a lure to get male attention. They can string a guy along without giving up the ass, because he'll hang in there just to be with a very attractive chick. Less attractive chicks have to give it up quicker to keep a dude around, at least in theory.

[GenJx]

[Hotwheels]

LSE girls give it up easily because they want the validation a stiff cock in their vajayjay gives them.

More average girls have LSE than hot ones.

[ElBorrachoInfamoso]

I've seen the relationship between weight and sluttiness before, but I thought it was weak. This definitely makes sense.

[Matt3B]

But the bottom line is, she's still a slut.

[TheBulldozer]

Research says the ugly ones are sluts. Other research says the hot ones are sluts.

Conclusion is....

[Hotwheels]

They're all sluts.

Except mom.

I've said that for years.

[GameTheory]

(02-11-2013 02:00 PM)Giovonny Wrote:  

In my experience, the opposite is true.

The more sexy a woman is, the more sexual she is!

Generally speaking.

IMHO, hot women bang more, but are also "pickier" than undesireable women--hotties reject more men because they have many more horndogs chasing after them. undesireable women bang less often, but accept a higher percentage of invitations to bang--they are less "picky" and MUST make due with what paltry choices they have.

thus, the "bang percentage" for hotties is lower ("less slutty").

[soup]

Nope, attractive girls are probably more likely to lie to researchers.

[soup]

(02-11-2013 04:25 PM)Hotwheels Wrote:  

They're all sluts.

Except mom.

I've said that for years.

Nah, mom was probably a slut back in the day as well. All women are the same.

[Hotwheels]

(02-11-2013 07:37 PM)soup Wrote:  

(02-11-2013 04:25 PM)Hotwheels Wrote:  

They're all sluts.

Except mom.

I've said that for years.

Nah, mom was probably a slut back in the day as well. All women are the same.

Thanks for ruining my fairytale.

[funkyzeit]

Depends. I've seen very hot sluts, but also very ugly and fat girls who value virginity (probably because it's the only thing they have to offer).

Keep in mind that girls want a man above them in the "scale".

A 1/10 will fuck men from 3-10/10 range, which are 90% of guys.

5/10 will fuck 7-10/10 range men, 20% of guys.

9/10 will fuck mostly 10/10 guys, which are like 2% of men, meaning lol less slutty!!1.

Our scale for women is mostly unique, some girl would be x/10 for most of us, give or take one point. The trick is in what makes a man y/10 in certains woman mind. y is a mixture of her needs, which depend on her social environment and her maeasurements of status.

[bojangles]

I like generalisations, so less slutty means they are still slutty, so they are all sluts.