Quote: (10-31-2012 01:56 AM)KorbenDallas Wrote:
Maybe I'm wrong. But this is something I know for certain. Culture will be different in 20 years. Think about what culture and dating was like in 1992 compared to today. I don't know what it was like because I was 2 years old, but I'm assuming it was very different. People in their 20's live in interesting times and the one thing that is constant is that things will continue to change.
French saying" The more things change, the more they stay the same. "
Women will keep wanting frivolous attention, and Roosh's insight into iPhones as a DDOS derailing women from loving is really great.
However, pseudo-socializing device addictions like Fakebook have a limiting factor in human neurology: It takes thousands of years to really change that significantly, there'll still be side-doors. Since women ultimately need to be physically touched, if you can start to program them more directly through physical means you may be able to temporarily pull them out of the cybertrance/Matrix-Mind.
You'll have to actively adopt psychological counter-Matrix techniques. Of course,
like all forms of social control you have to have some status ( alpha dominant bla bla) to be listened to, but once you have frame control, you can say stuff like:
"As long as you're on that phone, you're not an individual. You're just being programmed by people who are observing you- so-called friends-- to conform." Shit like that.
The article made me think of weekends with a chick, "Don't bring your phone."
Or have her turn it off most of the time she's with you.
Could be done with a steady once you indoctrinate her.
This is not optimal for guys who constantly want new chicks, but the trade off is they're so hyperactive their iPhones just make them more open to ONS mentality, as a previous poster stated.
If you want ONS, you can't really complain about the lack of deep communication with a straight face. Your place in the ecosystem requires that.