[Blackhawk]

(06-11-2012 02:57 AM)Moma Wrote:  

What does one HAVE to be, in order to be an alpha male in the world of game?

Roosh hired actors to try to explain his version of Alpha vs Beta male.

Did people like his video?

[soup]

(06-11-2012 02:57 AM)Moma Wrote:  

(06-05-2012 02:04 PM)soup Wrote:  

Anyway, just to clear things up for all those newbies reading this stuff- you don't need to go out and start sucking on dicks, you don't have to have a body like Arnold and a Danzel face, and you don't have to be Mark Zuckerberg to be an alpha male in the world of game.

What does one HAVE to be, in order to be an alpha male in the world of game?

To me, Alpha just means having facility with females. Betas are guys who lack an ease with women.

Of course there are myriad ways of comparing alphas.

When it comes to guys who are in the game (betas are spectators of the game), I'd say the most Alpha players are the ones who can easily get with the most attractive women. It doesn't matter if they have one or two thousand, it's the potential ability that matters.

This is in contrast to the grinders (like me), who put in countless hours of effort that results in banging girls in the medium range.

An example of a grinder's approach to bang ratio might be something like 10:1

For the highest order Alphas (rockstars, basketball players, etc.), the script is flipped, and he's the one getting approached, and also rejecting women. So the approach to bang ratio is 0:however much they want.

Mystery defined an MPUA (master pickup artist) as a guy who could can get a 5:5 ratio of consecutive approaches to bangs. To me, this means banging girls who are average or above average in looks.

Interestingly enough, I'd be that if Green Lantern where real, he have the choice to get any pussy he wanted. It doesn't matter if he's gay, what matters is his options when it comes to women.

[speakeasy]

There is way too much mental masturbation over what is alpha or beta. These concepts are mostly constructs anyway. In the end all that matters is whether you are pleased with your sex life or not.

[Moma]

(06-11-2012 12:28 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

There is way too much mental masturbation over what is alpha or beta. These concepts are mostly constructs anyway. In the end all that matters is whether you are pleased with your sex life or not.

So for the guy who rinses old grannies and obese lizards as long as he is happy, that's all that counts, right?

[soup]

(06-11-2012 08:14 PM)Moma Wrote:  

(06-11-2012 12:28 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

There is way too much mental masturbation over what is alpha or beta. These concepts are mostly constructs anyway. In the end all that matters is whether you are pleased with your sex life or not.

So for the guy who rinses old grannies and obese lizards as long as he is happy, that's all that counts, right?

"... That’s how you put a self-professed, proud fatty fucker to the test. Forget what he says. If he is approached for sex by two girls, one fat and one thin, and no one’s watching him, he’ll bang the thin one. Naturally, in real life, he won’t have that choice, because most fatty fuckers are losers who have no chance with slender girls. The exceedingly few men who would choose the fatty over the slim girl are freak outliers that serve to prove the rule rather than discredit it."

No. The girls have to pass the boner test. I think the bottom of game is the newbie/grinder level. A guy who pro-actively bangs multiple girls that most men would find repulsive is an anti-player; he's actually making it harder for other guys to get with attractive women by lowering the standards of the entire playing field. Instead of putting that energy into approaching attractive women, he's telling the world that it's OK for girls to be fat, and that there's nothing wrong with banging cougars.

I think we should be approaching the girls we find most attractive- the ones that give us the most approach-anxiety. We should avoid lowering our standards, even if it means getting a notch. It's better for the world.