[thegmanifesto]

(02-13-2012 12:57 PM)OGNorCal707 Wrote:  

I like how this thread is generalizing the whole state of CA, at my local beaches, I have: watched naked women doing yoga, a naked hippy mom play frisbee with her kids, played football, soccer, etc. taken a barbecue and grilled up bunch of meat, started a bonfire, drank beer/wine/liquor, smoked weed out of a bong, got my dick sucked, etc.

Yeah, you can murder someone on the beach also.

It doesn't make it legal.

The point is, many of those things used to be legal.

Now they are not.

(02-13-2012 12:25 PM)misterstir Wrote:  

if someone wants to play football, I'm all for it, do it on a open empty field that was designed for that purpose, don't do it at the mall or at the beach and complain you have no freedom when people ask that your idiotic behaviour be banned. if I get hit in the head by a football on the beach not only can sue the idiot who threw it but I can sue the city for making an unsafe environment, they have a duty to protect people from dangerous people.

How does someone develop an outlook on life like you have?

Abuse as a child?

Always picked last for sports?

Other kids constantly gave you wedggies?

[MikeCF]

(02-13-2012 12:25 PM)misterstir Wrote:  

When you get a conviction for assault you basically will never get hired in any professional career. No one should have to go to prison because someone violated their rights and the government refused to enforce or protect their rights. if someone wants to play football, I'm all for it, do it on a open empty field that was designed for that purpose, don't do it at the mall or at the beach and complain you have no freedom when people ask that your idiotic behaviour be banned. if I get hit in the head by a football on the beach not only can sue the idiot who threw it but I can sue the city for making an unsafe environment, they have a duty to protect people from dangerous people.

You have an obsession with rules and categories. E.g., "football is OK, if it's done on a football field/field designed for football."

Ever been diagnosed with Asperger's?

[thegmanifesto]

(02-13-2012 02:08 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

(02-13-2012 12:25 PM)misterstir Wrote:  

When you get a conviction for assault you basically will never get hired in any professional career. No one should have to go to prison because someone violated their rights and the government refused to enforce or protect their rights. if someone wants to play football, I'm all for it, do it on a open empty field that was designed for that purpose, don't do it at the mall or at the beach and complain you have no freedom when people ask that your idiotic behaviour be banned. if I get hit in the head by a football on the beach not only can sue the idiot who threw it but I can sue the city for making an unsafe environment, they have a duty to protect people from dangerous people.

You have an obsession with rules and categories. E.g., "football is OK, if it's done on a football field/field designed for football."

Ever been diagnosed with Asperger's?

Yeah, this guy has to be joking. Or a serious medical condition.

Or tons of abuse as a child.

Unless he was like the teachers pet/head snitch in school and this is what it develops into.

Quote:

if I get hit in the head by a football on the beach not only can sue the idiot

I would love to see this guy at Running of The Bulls in Spain.

Or Mardi Gras.

He would probably want to ban bead throwing cause someone might get hit in the eye.

[MikeCF]

(02-13-2012 02:50 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

Yeah, this guy has to be joking. Or a serious medical condition.

I've noticed a weird thing on game sites...maybe not weird, but bothersome.

Probably 10% of guys are actually players running game.

The rest are guys who are looking how to get better with women.

Yet guys come on her and be total assholes and fun killers.

Wouldn't it make sense to start learning how to be a cool guy?

After all, most players also have a lot of guy friends. If you're a cool guy, other guys will want to be around you. So too will women.

You'd think a guy who hasn't gotten laid with an 8 or better in his whole life would humble himself.

People are weird.

[misterstir]

(02-13-2012 01:01 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

(02-13-2012 12:57 PM)OGNorCal707 Wrote:  

I like how this thread is generalizing the whole state of CA, at my local beaches, I have: watched naked women doing yoga, a naked hippy mom play frisbee with her kids, played football, soccer, etc. taken a barbecue and grilled up bunch of meat, started a bonfire, drank beer/wine/liquor, smoked weed out of a bong, got my dick sucked, etc.

Yeah, you can murder someone on the beach also.

It doesn't make it legal.

The point is, many of those things used to be legal.

Now they are not.

(02-13-2012 12:25 PM)misterstir Wrote:  

if someone wants to play football, I'm all for it, do it on a open empty field that was designed for that purpose, don't do it at the mall or at the beach and complain you have no freedom when people ask that your idiotic behaviour be banned. if I get hit in the head by a football on the beach not only can sue the idiot who threw it but I can sue the city for making an unsafe environment, they have a duty to protect people from dangerous people.

How does someone develop an outlook on life like you have?

Abuse as a child?

Always picked last for sports?

Other kids constantly gave you wedggies?

Bold made me laugh

Saying people should do what they are suppose to do means I have something wrong with my life now. The real question is how does someone like you develop an outlook on life that people should just be able to do whatever they want wherever they want irregardless of how it affects others. Seems to be a real narcissistic view of life. How does someone come up with such a world view?

Did you not get enough affection as a child? Seriously, so your goal in life is to annoy as many people as possible insisting it is your right to do so.

[misterstir]

(02-13-2012 02:08 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

(02-13-2012 12:25 PM)misterstir Wrote:  

When you get a conviction for assault you basically will never get hired in any professional career. No one should have to go to prison because someone violated their rights and the government refused to enforce or protect their rights. if someone wants to play football, I'm all for it, do it on a open empty field that was designed for that purpose, don't do it at the mall or at the beach and complain you have no freedom when people ask that your idiotic behaviour be banned. if I get hit in the head by a football on the beach not only can sue the idiot who threw it but I can sue the city for making an unsafe environment, they have a duty to protect people from dangerous people.

You have an obsession with rules and categories. E.g., "football is OK, if it's done on a football field/field designed for football."

Ever been diagnosed with Asperger's?

Nope, I don't feel that is true. The real question is why you have such a compulsion to disregard and break the rules. Ever been diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder?

[misterstir]

(02-13-2012 03:02 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

(02-13-2012 02:50 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

Yeah, this guy has to be joking. Or a serious medical condition.

I've noticed a weird thing on game sites...maybe not weird, but bothersome.

Probably 10% of guys are actually players running game.

The rest are guys who are looking how to get better with women.

Yet guys come on her and be total assholes and fun killers.

Wouldn't it make sense to start learning how to be a cool guy?

After all, most players also have a lot of guy friends. If you're a cool guy, other guys will want to be around you. So too will women.

You'd think a guy who hasn't gotten laid with an 8 or better in his whole life would humble himself.

People are weird.

Didn't we stop having cool guy after high school? From what I recall of high school the cool guy got the cool girls who by mid 20s have mostly done gangbangs anyways, is that what you want, i'll pass. The thing about being an adult is that the cool guy is not really limited to a narrow genre of guy. A goth guy who'd never be the "Cool guy" can turn around and bang every goth and emo chick in town.

Most players I know have no or few guy friends and if they do have guy friends they are also players. The truth is there is little benefit for MOST players to have guy friends. If the guy isn't into gaming and is just a regular dude not into game he will be dead weight at best or fuck up your game with new girls at worst which is more common. Even if they just stand around and do nothing its creepy like that video of Italian guys in Latvia where one did all the talking and 2 just stood next to him smiling and looking creepy. Other players who have guy friends are really just hanging around competition. You go for a 2 set, and you end up both chasing the hot girl. There is no real benefit in gaming with a wingman unless he is good. I only encountered one such guy worth gaming with and I taught him everything he knew and we gamed together because we would argue and girls would find it cute but other than that guy can't think of anyone who was worth gaming with. Other players competition, other friends dead weight

[thegmanifesto]

(02-13-2012 11:29 PM)misterstir Wrote:  

Bold made me laugh

Saying people should do what they are suppose to do means I have something wrong with my life now.

Again, you really must be the life of the party.

Or would you ban partying because maybe you would stub your toe and cry?

Serious question.

Another question:

Where did you grow up?

Another question:

Were you the kid always crying when other kids were playing rough?

Did you always have a runny nose?

I am trying to get to the bottom of this.

[misterstir]

(02-13-2012 11:49 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

(02-13-2012 11:29 PM)misterstir Wrote:  

Bold made me laugh

Saying people should do what they are suppose to do means I have something wrong with my life now.

Again, you really must be the life of the party.

Or would you ban partying because maybe you would stub your toe and cry?

Serious question.

Another question:

Where did you grow up?

Another question:

Were you the kid always crying when other kids were playing rough?

Did you always have a runny nose?

I am trying to get to the bottom of this.

You answer my questions first

The real question is how does someone like you develop an outlook on life that people should just be able to do whatever they want wherever they want irregardless of how it affects others. Seems to be a real narcissistic view of life. How does someone come up with such a world view?

Did you not get enough affection as a child? Seriously, so your goal in life is to annoy as many people as possible insisting it is your right to do so

[el mechanico]

Mister stir..you're gonna die here even at weak Cali standards. Stay safe and wear protection. Watch out for wild kids playing/practicing sports.

[thegmanifesto]

(02-14-2012 12:21 AM)misterstir Wrote:  

How does someone come up with such a world view?

My life is well documented on my site and on this forum.

Your fear of answering solved one of the worlds great mysteries.

The kid who was always crying at school because other kids were playing rough turns out to be a whinny adult that doesn't want people to play football on the beach because he might get sand in his little eye.

I guess that makes sense.

Watch out next time you are at the park, a little girl may hit you with a badminton racquet or kick some dirt in your face.

And we might have to go ahead and ban dirt.

[misterstir]

(02-14-2012 12:27 AM)el mechanico Wrote:  

Mister stir..you're gonna die here even at weak Cali standards. Stay safe and wear protection. Watch out for wild kids playing/practicing sports.

O I am so scared, I wet myself, I am going to run home to mommie

[misterstir]

(02-14-2012 12:32 AM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

(02-14-2012 12:21 AM)misterstir Wrote:  

How does someone come up with such a world view?

My life is well documented on my site and on this forum.

Your fear of answering solved one of the worlds great mysteries.

The kid who was always crying at school because other kids were playing rough turns out to be a whinny adult that doesn't want people to play football on the beach because he might get sand in his little eye.

I guess that makes sense.

Watch out next time you are at the park, a little girl may hit you with a badminton racquet or kick some dirt in your face.

And we might have to go ahead and ban dirt.

Ok you answered the first half now answer the second half like a big boy

Did you not get enough affection as a child? Seriously, so your goal in life is to annoy as many people as possible insisting it is your right to do so?

If a little girl hits me with dirt in the face her parents better be rich because she is so sued, and even if they aren't who ever owns that dirt is totally sued.

[thegmanifesto]

(02-14-2012 12:44 AM)misterstir Wrote:  

O I am so scared, I wet myself, I am going to run home to mommie

I have no doubt that was a daily occurrence during your childhood.

(02-14-2012 12:59 AM)misterstir Wrote:  

If a little girl hits me with dirt in the face her parents better be rich because she is so sued, and even if they aren't who ever owns that dirt is totally sued.

Wow.

You might be the biggest dork I have ever had contact with.

It must have sucked getting beaten up by girls when you were a kid.

Enjoy your miserable life.

[Amour Fou]

CHAOS NEVER DIED

These freaking burocrats want to take away all gusto for living life to its fullest and push people into the only "unthreatening" and "harmless" environment you can find: flipping channels in front of a tv screen or spending money on stupid gadgets at the mall.

I've been living under US totalitarian dictatorship (because that is how it feels) for close to 6 months now (leaving in a few days). Their laws assume that you are as brainless as the people you watch in TV commercials and thus they push these "schoolyard" laws onto the population that goes far, FAR beyond mere conviviality between citizens. It is completely meaningless moralic nonsense that anyone who has ever tasted the air of a freer environment would deem absurd, stupid and reminded of how a kindergarden is run.

This paternalistic state assumes that its citizens aren't capable of any responsible action what so ever and thus coerce people BY THREATS AND FEAR, as schooyard bullies would do.

Anyone who doesn't find this absurd is because they have been completely absorbed by the system and never had the opportunity of experiencing life on a freer (and healthier) environment where people aren't ingrained from birth by these STUPID CONCEPTS OF RIGHT AND WRONG that deeply divides people's hearts and souls in this deeply institutionalized nation that is the USA, where the overbearing eyes and hands of the state try to categorize, define, restrain, assimilate, codify EVERY ASPECT OF LIFE unto its registers, allowing NO GREY AREAS where people can live unrestrained from categorizations and labels, in the spontaneity of BEING.

This can be found in every aspect and institution of such society.

"To define is to limit", and by defining you also remove a portion of life, spontaneity, freedom away.

I've lived under such regime for 6 months... I can already feel more frightful and scared of "doing something wrong" like I've never been before. Why do the same small freedoms that I took for granted back home makes me feel like a criminal over here?

-America, the land of the free-

(To choose between brands A and B)

[MikeCF]

(02-14-2012 01:10 AM)Amour Fou Wrote:  

I've lived under such regime for 6 months... I can already feel more frightful and scared of "doing something wrong" like I've never been before. Why do the same small freedoms that I took for granted back home makes me feel like a criminal over here?

In the U.S., it's not just government. You also have guys threatening lawsuits over getting sand in their face.

Those are the first guys to pop off in a bar, get their asses kicked, and then call the police and sue.

The U.S. is a nation of beta males.

[46.]

(02-09-2012 03:55 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

Yeah, California is a different place than it was 15 years ago.

I told people when the cigarette ban happened that it was going to be the tip of the iceberg for loss of freedom.

Now you can't:

Drink on the beach
Smoke on the beach
Smoke in parks
Drink in parks

Now you can't even throw a football!
There is no end in sight.

There really is no end in sight. California has been co-opted by, for lack of a better phrase, holier-than-thou left-wing tyranny. And I'm a progressive Democrat.

Here's where it started for me: Way back in the 1990's, I was talkin' to a tasty leftist Northern Cali chick. You know the drill- being charming, getting her hot n' heavy interested (she was) trying to take it to the next level. We're on the same political "team" So I'm talking to her about the struggle, the good fight, blah blah. I said something to the effect like "So as black folks, in our communities we realized..." Then she interrupts: "You mean African-Americans?" I'm like "WTF??"

At that point I'd never talked to someone who absolutely knew what was best for me. How I should define myself. The height of arrogance and paternalism. This was some new and advanced s---.

And so it developed over the years. People are taking the "we know what's best for you" stuff further and further in Cali, banning smoking...and more...now SF is trying to ban f---ing Happy Meals!!! Then with the same breath these people will talk about freedom and personal f----ing liberties and other asinine s--- all day. When Southern Conservatives ban stuff, they're evil. When the Cali folks do it it's ok. When the Conservatives do it, I get p---ed off and fired up, but IMO, neither they or the Cali Mafia have any clue what personal liberties are. Nor do they respect them. They only respect their own opinions, sensibilities, tastes, and conveniences.

I'm a progressive democrat but I realize this isn't politics, but neurosis. So I call them on it. I have SF homies so into banning stuff, but they don't do s--- about slums in Oakland or migrant farm workers living in misery 50 miles away from them. It's a perversion of left wing thought and annoys the living f--- out of me. And as G says, there's no end in sight. (I'm very pro choice, but if you ever want to be kicked out of a house in Cali, ask a girl why they can have abortions but you can't have a cigarette)

There was a great article in the Daily Beast/Newsweek that discussed this unique Cali approach: Death of the Dream
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/20...dream.html
"Today the politics of narcissism is most evident among "progressives." "

It's sad because I look to Cali for new progressive ideas. The whole thing kind of reminds me of the Big Lebowski- all the old weird, goofy liberal types who made Cali such an interesting place are fading away and the replacements are really, really getting on my last M----- F----- nerve, yet I want to support them.

(02-12-2012 10:33 PM)Tail Gunner Wrote:  

That is the same argument that kept African-Americans in segregated schools and buses for nearly 100 years.

I hear ya'. It's called the Tyranny of the Majority.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority
About 47 billion volumes of philosophy have been written about it, yet somehow, everyone ignores it when it doesn't fit our needs.

[misterstir]

(02-14-2012 01:15 AM)MikeCF Wrote:  

(02-14-2012 01:10 AM)Amour Fou Wrote:  

I've lived under such regime for 6 months... I can already feel more frightful and scared of "doing something wrong" like I've never been before. Why do the same small freedoms that I took for granted back home makes me feel like a criminal over here?

In the U.S., it's not just government. You also have guys threatening lawsuits over getting sand in their face.

Those are the first guys to pop off in a bar, get their asses kicked, and then call the police and sue.

The U.S. is a nation of beta males.

I don't like that tone mister, you better watch it or I will sue

Jeez, Herman Cain was right, America needs a sense of humour.

But seriously though, I blame the bureacrats in washington for making me have to sue everyone. You can't punch someone in the face like the old days because being arrested makes it impossible to work in almost any professional job which is basically a poverty sentence.

If someone were to try to fight me in a bar, I would sue them if they did hit me because if I hit them I'd probably knock them out or kill them by accident when I got up into my rage and stomp them. I know better, I just walk away in those situations it isn't worth it. Its a lose lose situation so I chose the lose less option. The last guy who him and his 4 friends came and attacked me in the bar and I through one punch and knocked him out and he didn't get up I got scared he was dead and he was bleeding from his nose and his mouth and his gf came out of no where and was threatening to call the cops on me even though he was the instigator.

[misterstir]

(02-14-2012 01:52 AM)46. Wrote:  

(02-09-2012 03:55 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

Yeah, California is a different place than it was 15 years ago.

I told people when the cigarette ban happened that it was going to be the tip of the iceberg for loss of freedom.

Now you can't:

Drink on the beach
Smoke on the beach
Smoke in parks
Drink in parks

Now you can't even throw a football!
There is no end in sight.

There really is no end in sight. California has been co-opted by, for lack of a better phrase, holier-than-thou left-wing tyranny. And I'm a progressive Democrat.

Here's where it started for me: Way back in the 1990's, I was talkin' to a tasty leftist Northern Cali chick. You know the drill- being charming, getting her hot n' heavy interested (she was) trying to take it to the next level. We're on the same political "team" So I'm talking to her about the struggle, the good fight, blah blah. I said something to the effect like "So as black folks, in our communities we realized..." Then she interrupts: "You mean African-Americans?" I'm like "WTF??"

At that point I'd never talked to someone who absolutely knew what was best for me. How I should define myself. The height of arrogance and paternalism. This was some new and advanced s---.

And so it developed over the years. People are taking the "we know what's best for you" stuff further and further in Cali, banning smoking...and more...now SF is trying to ban f---ing Happy Meals!!! Then with the same breath these people will talk about freedom and personal f----ing liberties and other asinine s--- all day. When Southern Conservatives ban stuff, they're evil. When the Cali folks do it it's ok. When the Conservatives do it, I get p---ed off and fired up, but IMO, neither they or the Cali Mafia have any clue what personal liberties are. Nor do they respect them. They only respect their own opinions, sensibilities, tastes, and conveniences.

I'm a progressive democrat but I realize this isn't politics, but neurosis. So I call them on it. I have SF homies so into banning stuff, but they don't do s--- about slums in Oakland or migrant farm workers living in misery 50 miles away from them. It's a perversion of left wing thought and annoys the living f--- out of me. And as G says, there's no end in sight. (I'm very pro choice, but if you ever want to be kicked out of a house in Cali, ask a girl why they can have abortions but you can't have a cigarette)

There was a great article in the Daily Beast/Newsweek that discussed this unique Cali approach: Death of the Dream
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/20...dream.html
"Today the politics of narcissism is most evident among "progressives." "

It's sad because I look to Cali for new progressive ideas. The whole thing kind of reminds me of the Big Lebowski- all the old weird, goofy liberal types who made Cali such an interesting place are fading away and the replacements are really, really getting on my last M----- F----- nerve, yet I want to support them.

(02-12-2012 10:33 PM)Tail Gunner Wrote:  

That is the same argument that kept African-Americans in segregated schools and buses for nearly 100 years.

I hear ya'. It's called the Tyranny of the Majority.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority
About 47 billion volumes of philosophy have been written about it, yet somehow, everyone ignores it when it doesn't fit our needs.

I only disagree with your smoking angle. I don't think people who are not pro smoking are not saying YOU shouldn't be allowed to smoke, its more that THEY don't want to smell your smoke. Most rational minded people have no objection to say smoking cigar lounges. What they do object to is going to regular places where there is no non smoking option.

Thats funny that a person who is "pro liberty" like your self is pro choice. Most of those people who go off about Liberty like Ron Paul are pro life.

Anyways as a proud conservative I believe I have the right not to have my rights infringed by rude and narcissistic peoples who are inconsiderate of others.

[worldwidetraveler]

(02-14-2012 03:30 AM)misterstir Wrote:  

Most rational minded people have no objection to say smoking cigar lounges. What they do object to is going to regular places where there is no non smoking option.

That isn't rational at all.

The owner of the lounge or bar should be able to decide whether they want to allow smoking or not. If you don't like it then you don't need to go there.

You seem to have no problem dictating how others live and how they run their business as long as you get what you want.

[46.]

(02-14-2012 03:30 AM)misterstir Wrote:  

I only disagree with your smoking angle. I don't think people who are not pro smoking are not saying YOU shouldn't be allowed to smoke, its more that THEY don't want to smell your smoke.

In understand where you're coming from, but you have to remember the smoking thing was the just the top of the slippery slope that's led to public officials spending time and resources trying to ban Happy Meals while Cali education budgets are slashed, student aid is cut, social services to the vulnerable disappear, and police and firefighters get laid off.
California and Bust (Michael Lewis)
http://www.vanityfair.com/business/featu...wis-201111

[misterstir]

(02-14-2012 10:04 AM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  

(02-14-2012 03:30 AM)misterstir Wrote:  

Most rational minded people have no objection to say smoking cigar lounges. What they do object to is going to regular places where there is no non smoking option.

That isn't rational at all.

The owner of the lounge or bar should be able to decide whether they want to allow smoking or not. If you don't like it then you don't need to go there.

You seem to have no problem dictating how others live and how they run their business as long as you get what you want.

Where do you live in the day of charlameigne. Why can't you smoke outside? The owner should not be the one deciding because the employees have no choice in the matter and in many small towns neither do the patrons. Its a public health issue. I have to pay for when those people get sick and can't afford care or when their insurance denies them coverage.

If you want to have a cigar lounge I don't oppose it, but no alcohol should be allowed in there.

[el mechanico]

(02-14-2012 11:44 AM)misterstir Wrote:  

(02-14-2012 10:04 AM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  

(02-14-2012 03:30 AM)misterstir Wrote:  

Most rational minded people have no objection to say smoking cigar lounges. What they do object to is going to regular places where there is no non smoking option.

That isn't rational at all.

The owner of the lounge or bar should be able to decide whether they want to allow smoking or not. If you don't like it then you don't need to go there.

You seem to have no problem dictating how others live and how they run their business as long as you get what you want.

Where do you live in the day of charlameigne. Why can't you smoke outside? The owner should not be the one deciding because the employees have no choice in the matter and in many small towns neither do the patrons. Its a public health issue. I have to pay for when those people get sick and can't afford care or when their insurance denies them coverage.

If you want to have a cigar lounge I don't oppose it, but no alcohol should be allowed in there.

[worldwidetraveler]

(02-14-2012 11:44 AM)misterstir Wrote:  

Where do you live in the day of charlameigne. Why can't you smoke outside? The owner should not be the one deciding because the employees have no choice in the matter and in many small towns neither do the patrons. Its a public health issue. I have to pay for when those people get sick and can't afford care or when their insurance denies them coverage.

I think we got bigger issues at play here. You are now telling us that employees are slaves and have no choice of employment?

I live in the north where it gets really cold. I can only imagine going out for a smoke (I don't smoke) at night time when it gets below freezing. How about you go outside for when you want some fresh air.

I also have a friend, that owned a bar in Georgia, who had to enforce a no smoking law that was passed. Business dropped considerably and he ended up selling.

Quote:

If you want to have a cigar lounge I don't oppose it, but no alcohol should be allowed in there.

Now you are dictating what establishments can sell alcohol?

You must be great with the women. I can only imagine them swooning over you with that rebel may care attitude.

"Sorry honey, we can't cross the street here but need to cross at the legal crosswalks."

"Baby, I will have to report you to the police for throwing gum on the ground. We have littering laws and you are just too dangerous to society."

"Sorry baby, but I can't hit that hole due to the Sodomy law. I am starting to think you are a dangerous person for asking me to do bad stuff like that."

(02-14-2012 11:51 AM)el mechanico Wrote:  

No doubt about it. I can't imagine someone being that stupid.

[46.]

(02-14-2012 11:54 AM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  

"Sorry baby, but I can't hit that hole due to the Sodomy law. I am starting to think you are a dangerous person for asking me to do bad stuff like that."

At least that will be allowed in Cali for a while. You know Cali is going to ban vaginal sex soon due to disease, unsafe conditions, ambiguous consent, and dudes constantly fighting over it. Its just too dangerous for most people to handle. Gov. Brown: "In vitro fertilisation has shown to be the safest means of human procreation...as of Jan 1 2013, all non-lesbian vaginal intercourse shall be banned for the good of us all."