[Sombro]

http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2014/10/20/...epage=true

Quote:

Reading their story, one can’t help but wonder if mainstream feminist advocates for slut walks and “Yes Means Yes” legislation would condemn the pair for regretting the life they chose. After all, their body, their choice, right? They took control of their bad marriages, divorced the husbands they referred to as “pimps” and chose, fully of their own volition, to remain in the sex trade after their exes were fully out of the picture. Martine and Louise, it would seem, are the originators of the Slut Walk.

According to the precepts of contemporary feminism, the Fokkens’ choice should be anything but regretted. In fact these women should be praised, not only for choosing to approach sexuality as a point-based sport (according to the Cosmo-reported tally, they had 355,000 men between them), but for resisting ageism in the profession as well:

Quote:

“The working girls used to be Dutch, now they’re all foreign,” she said. “The clients used to be local, now they’re tourists. And there used to be older girls. But now if you dare be [there] over 25, they stand in front of your window and make fun like you’re some sort of freak.”

But not every element of their story matches the feminist narrative. Louise has four children, Martine, 3. Abortion is not mentioned in any reports, and as far as why the women retired from the sex trade:

Quote:

…the two have given up the life, complaining that the government takes most of their pay now. Just like the rest of us. “There is no point working just for tax.”

They’re also giving negative reviews to government intervention in Amsterdam’s sex trade:

Quote:

They believe the “golden years” of prostitution in Amsterdam came long before its legalization in 2000, a development Martine said “has not improved prostitutes’ lives.”

[…]

Quote:

Renegade feminist Camille Paglia’s bold statements in favor of the sex trade may make you cringe, but have no doubt her opinions on sex and sexuality are grounded in a thorough study of human culture and psychology. This is perhaps why she is at such odds with the slut-walk feminist crowd. Slut-walk feminists demand permission to expose their bodies in a sexual manner without male reaction. The demand implies male power over female sexuality when, as Paglia argues, the very opposite appears to be the natural case:

Quote:

“The prostitute is not, as feminists claim, the victim of men but rather their conqueror, an outlaw who controls the sexual channel between nature and culture.”

The feminist line is, strippers and topless dancers are degraded, subordinated, and enslaved; they are victims, turned into objects by the display of their anatomy. But women are far from being victims — women rule; they are in total control … the feminist analysis of prostitution says that men are using money as power over women. I’d say, yes, that’s all that men have. The money is a confession of weakness. They have to buy women’s attention. It’s not a sign of power; it’s a sign of weakness.

Women have an innate authority over men in the sexual realm. Slut-walk feminists, teethed on the false notions of the all-consuming “patriarchy,” have relegated authority over their sexuality to the state. In doing so, these feminists believe the most they can do is caterwaul for legal protection any time a man glances in their general direction. Theirs is the aberration of a woman’s intrinsic sexual power.

...Paglia writes:

Quote:

Straight men who visit prostitutes are valiantly striving to keep sex free from emotion, duty, family–in other words, from society, religion, and procreative Mother Nature.

[…]

Quote:

Contrary to contemporary feminist claptrap that simultaneously demands and condemns socially engineered female authority, Paglia explains what the Fokkens exemplify: A woman’s sexual authority is intuitive. She neither needs nor requires permission from the state to exhibit her sexuality. The idea that female sexuality is dependent upon the state’s protection for its very survival is nothing more than the result of “rape culture,” a myth predicated on fear and faulty statistics. That’s not to say, however, that human sexuality doesn’t require a healthy context in which to function.

Paglia, who rails against feminism’s social engineering ethos, observes:

Quote:

Feminists who think they can abolish the sex trade are in a state of massive delusion. Only a ruthless, fascist regime of vast scale could eradicate the rogue sex impulse that is indistinguishable from the life force. Simply in the Western world, pagan sexuality has survived 2000 years of Judaeo-Christian persecution and is hardly going to be defeated by a few feminists whacking at it with their brooms.