Quote: (10-03-2014 04:06 PM)jariel Wrote:I absolutely agree with everything you wrote in this post.
Quote: (10-03-2014 03:36 PM)assman Wrote:
A friend who observed the same couple suggested the difference is guys who have had a lot of pussy tend to have standards and would prefer to masturbate rather than dip below those standards, while guys who have had very little (or no) pussy will tolerate almost any female to get access to real vagina rather than resorting to the standby of masturbation. Thoughts?
I'm not sure I agree with that conclusion.
A lot of guys who get a lot of pussy tend to fuck a lot of chicks beneath them.
That's not to say they fuck fat chicks, but they fuck relative to their value in the sexual marketplace.
Ultimately, that means if you're an average or slightly above-average guy (5-6), if you want to fuck a lot of bitches, you'll have to fuck some below-average women, which means you'll likely end up diving into the fat bitch pool.
You can be a 7-8 as a man, but if you want to plow through pussy, I guarantee you that you won't only fuck at and above your value.
I should have specified that my friend and I were discussing relationships, not casual sex. I.e., I'd rather masturbate than date someone beneath me in the sexual marketplace. For sure, I'm willing to fuck chicks below my own perceived SMV.
Thinking about it some more and reading between the lines, I guess my friend's point was that guys who have a lot of experience are able to separate sex and dating. We may bang below our SMV, but we won't date below it. While guys who have little or no experience (as a result of low SMV) may not have that option - if they want sex at all, they have to date; casual sex may not be an option for them.
And since they don't have much or any prior sexual experience, any pussy, even obese pussy, is better than sticking with masturbation.
Again, just thinking out loud here, and trying to develop a rationale for why we see guys dating very physically unattractive women instead of sticking with porn.