Quote:Quote:
As long as the beta dude with money is getting sex, he's really not losing. He could probably get a whole harem of chicks like that. And from another perspective, the "alpha" dude is also getting cheated on for dudes with money lol.
Well if you look at it from that perspective, I guess.
Though I'm not sure how happy betas are with their harems, if they have to pay for it. Donald Sterling apparently suffered a lot of psychological grief because one of whores was banging with pro athletes.
I think betas feel like they "own" their women because they're paying for it. Alphas get it for free and don't seem that invested in their girls.
Quote:Quote:
It goes in both directions. Like one of the guys here said, you're not going to AMOG a guy with $100 million (aka Dan Bilzerian types).
That's exactly what happened to the Rothschild heir, who was married into a super prominent banking family. This Rothschild woman had a husband worth $500 and had an affair with a little known rapper. It's amazing a woman would do that and makes you wonder.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...iends.html
Dan Bilzerian is a poker player. That's a naturally alpha profession. In comparison, most heirs to fortunes and MBA/finance types are effete. I wouldn't lump him in with other rich men.
Quote:Quote:
And yes, women are attracted to wealth itself. Especially if it is self-made. It is a sign of strength.
If you're saying women are attracted to money, I agree. If you're saying women are turned on by men with money, I don't think that's really the case. Sterling is a good example of how being rich, without being attractive, works in real life. To these girls, a rich man is just a walking ATM.
You'd think being a team owner and really powerful man in LA would be attractive to Stiviano. Nope. She'd rather chase celebs, who have the real status.
Quote:Quote:
You just need to back it up with good dick.
Yep. Good dick + money.