Depends what you call contempt. Personally, I'd be asking the judge what it means to be "innocent until proven guilty"
As for contempt? Straight up. The prisoner isn't even given a chance. I can't know for certain what went down, but from what I saw, the "evidence" amounted to eye witness statements - from people who automatically treat anyone in his position in contempt. Personally, I'd throw the case straight out if they didn't have anything else. The case itself was straight up bullshit. Even if he were hocking up something, he could have been just clearing his throat.
I liked how the judge ignored the guard mocking the prisoner. Interesting what people let slide when they're on "the same team"
He had every right to be pissed off
As for contempt? Straight up. The prisoner isn't even given a chance. I can't know for certain what went down, but from what I saw, the "evidence" amounted to eye witness statements - from people who automatically treat anyone in his position in contempt. Personally, I'd throw the case straight out if they didn't have anything else. The case itself was straight up bullshit. Even if he were hocking up something, he could have been just clearing his throat.
I liked how the judge ignored the guard mocking the prisoner. Interesting what people let slide when they're on "the same team"
He had every right to be pissed off