[Moma]

(10-07-2012 03:49 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

Binary doesn't make sense because it never actually just comes down to just "would you bang?" There are all kinds of nuanced questions that you don't even realize are running through your head, when you want to think you're deciding between two or three choices.

Would you do any real work to bang?
Would you bang if you were on a cold streak?
Would you bang more than once?
Would you mind if your friends knew that you banged?
Would you bang over some other chick?
Would you bang, given the rest of talent available at this conference, school, retreat, out-of-the-way bar?
Would you bang if she came and grabbed your dick?
How much would you enjoy banging?
How much work would you do to bang?
Would you just bang, or would you eat her pussy and even her asshole?

Some chicks "you wouldn't bang," you would bang if the circumstances or context were a certain way. This is why you need a more relativized scale. Binary is false illusion players who fancy themselves I-don't-give-a-fuck minimalists pretend to use, when in reality they're operate a complex logic better explained by a scale with way more than two or three categories.

my bangs are secretive so that I don't have peer pressure judging. I hit a so so lizard back in Toronto and I bumped into her with one of my friends. After we exchanged a terse greeting, he said to me "Dude, you hit that?" in dismay.
I thought she was alright (binary wise) so I didn't understand why he was so aghast.