In a country such as the US that vehemently defends its right to bear arms, a law to eradicate a living/breathing member and protector of the family would never be passed, even if the evidence suggests that on the whole, the breed does more harm than good.
Then there is the commerciality of implementing and policing such a program/law. An average of 21 deaths per year over the last 13 years is not a significant concern when compared to other more prevalent causes of preventable death. Cost/benefit ratio would be extremely low.
Further, “Pit Bull” isn't a breed. It’s a term used to describe the American Pit Bull Terrier, the Bull Terrier, the American Staffordshire Terrier, and the Staffordshire Bull Terrier.
(English) Staffy lover here.
Then there is the commerciality of implementing and policing such a program/law. An average of 21 deaths per year over the last 13 years is not a significant concern when compared to other more prevalent causes of preventable death. Cost/benefit ratio would be extremely low.
Further, “Pit Bull” isn't a breed. It’s a term used to describe the American Pit Bull Terrier, the Bull Terrier, the American Staffordshire Terrier, and the Staffordshire Bull Terrier.
(English) Staffy lover here.