wtf is "retrospective prostitution". If the element of consent is not present at the time of intercourse then it is rape.
It may be argued that consent existed at the time and that such consent was further subsequently ratified, however, I feel as if acceding to extortionary demands really is always trudging murky water.
I don't think it was rape (it was Ronaldo and some gutter-tier woman for God's sake) though the argument of retrospective prostitution is null and void.
It may be argued that consent existed at the time and that such consent was further subsequently ratified, however, I feel as if acceding to extortionary demands really is always trudging murky water.
I don't think it was rape (it was Ronaldo and some gutter-tier woman for God's sake) though the argument of retrospective prostitution is null and void.