I don't think the sole reason why people invest has to do with risk taking, otherwise people who climb buildings would be the best investors. This argument is essentially saying that the prime reason why some people have BTC and some do not is because of risk.
As someone else said it's in most cultures for men to have more interest in technology than women, it's only recently became socially acceptable for women to use computers and play video games and not look like nerds (which is why now it is supposed to be "cool" when a girl says she likes mario kart on her dating profile). It will likely take another generation for women to catch up.
Correct me if I am wrong but aren't most crypto holders from Asia? If we were to follow this template, this would mean that people from East Asia take more risks than people from America, which I find hard to believe (my experience in China gives me more of an impression that many Asians are designed to be part of their system more so than Americans are). More people in Asia are probably tech savy, trendy or friendly than in the West, which is probably why Asians are bigger on this than Westerners (I could be wrong, but it's my guess). Men have been connected to technology longer than women. A large reason why people do not hold BTC is due to lack of knowledge of it and how it works - in the grand scheme of things hardly any one had bit coins before a few years ago in general. Men also have more wealth than women as a whole, and more money to invest.
As for whether men take bigger risks than women in general, I would say so - though I don't think that's why so many more men hold bitcoins than women (at least not in a direct sense, it is more layered than that). Men have been expected to take care of themselves and a family for much longer than women, and predominantly men attract women through success (or at least this is what most men think) which can only happen through risks (and a reason why most people want success is to get pussy).
As someone else said it's in most cultures for men to have more interest in technology than women, it's only recently became socially acceptable for women to use computers and play video games and not look like nerds (which is why now it is supposed to be "cool" when a girl says she likes mario kart on her dating profile). It will likely take another generation for women to catch up.
Correct me if I am wrong but aren't most crypto holders from Asia? If we were to follow this template, this would mean that people from East Asia take more risks than people from America, which I find hard to believe (my experience in China gives me more of an impression that many Asians are designed to be part of their system more so than Americans are). More people in Asia are probably tech savy, trendy or friendly than in the West, which is probably why Asians are bigger on this than Westerners (I could be wrong, but it's my guess). Men have been connected to technology longer than women. A large reason why people do not hold BTC is due to lack of knowledge of it and how it works - in the grand scheme of things hardly any one had bit coins before a few years ago in general. Men also have more wealth than women as a whole, and more money to invest.
As for whether men take bigger risks than women in general, I would say so - though I don't think that's why so many more men hold bitcoins than women (at least not in a direct sense, it is more layered than that). Men have been expected to take care of themselves and a family for much longer than women, and predominantly men attract women through success (or at least this is what most men think) which can only happen through risks (and a reason why most people want success is to get pussy).