Quote:Quote:
...
So let me just summarize: the social worker at the school is Muslim, the administrator who ok’s homeschooling is Muslim, the CPS worker is Muslim, the nurse practitioner at the ER is Muslim, the doctor at the ER is Muslim. These are positions of authority that wield a lot of power.
Are you starting to get the picture?
So, that would obviously be a bad thing if you aren't Muslim.
Wouldn't it also be a bad thing to be a Muslim in a community where the school social worker, various administrators, CPS workers, nurse practitioners and doctors are non-Muslims?
If that we can agree that this is true, then the only solution is to have religious and ethnic communities simply live in different communities.
That might work if wealth distribution was naturally balanced, but this 'separate, but equal" approach is going to create genuine problems if one or more ethnic/religious groups control enough wealth that other ethnic/religious groups can't provide jobs internally (for example, Muslims in a Muslim community creating enough jobs for themselves).
Since the Communist fantasy of wealth distribution isn't even worth considering as a possibility, where does this lead us?
I keep coming back to the same conclusion. We need to move away from being a debt-based society where the cost of "buying in" requires acquiring the weight of debt and where the average person can't possibly picture creating a job for himself.
This might be possible if technology is properly leveraged, but you can bet that the elites will oppose this notion.
I'm the King of Beijing!