Quote: (07-04-2017 02:10 AM)Corollary Wrote:
After reading a ton of threads on this forum, I've observed that everyone here has a different definition of "game." Of course each definition of "game" has something to do with getting laid, but each definition is different enough that everyone ends up talking past each other in threads like this one.
It's not too difficult to figure out each individual's definition from the context in his posts, but no one seems to do that. Instead, everyone just (implicitly) puts forth his own definition instead and uses it as the starting point of his answer.
The looks vs. game question will probably continue to be asked and not sufficiently answered until everyone can agree on what "game" means.
It's actually not complex for me.
Looks, game in that order.
If you analyze it logically, you'll find this to be true. Typically guys in the "looks don't matter" camp aren't looking at it objectively and have too much emotional attachment to the game aspect of attraction.
With that said, I also know about the potential of game to override disadvantages in looks so I'm not saying guys should focus on looks exclusively. A logical self-analysis will reveal to you what you should focus on next to improve.
Surgically precise game is best game.
-Surgeon