There's nothing wrong with wanting a small government that doesn't start wars, having a pointless war on drugs and in hundreds of other ways violating their citizens' rights. But you don't have to label yourself a libertarian to believe that.
Hardcore libertarians are gammas for the most part - they simply have no understanding of human nature and instead believe the justness of their principles to be able to sustain a society without noticing the current playing field and all the games being played around them.
Take the free market for example - they ignore the fact that a supercartel owns 60% of the world's wealth, so how could there possibly be a free market when there's already a monopoly?
They would gain total direct control over your life in a libertarian state and if anything the globalist elite are promoting libertarianism because then they can simply rule over the serfs with tyranny enforced by their own private military which would dwarf that of any country ever seen before.
Not only that but they ignore completely the long-term effects of a society left to it's own devices. Without a state to enforce taxes the military power of a libertarian country would quickly stagnate and they'd be overrun by any foreign power. Getting people to think long-term isn't in most people's nature so although paying towards a local neighbourhood militia is likely, funding a national-level army is not.
This is without even getting into the ways border defence, healthcare, birth rates, justice and much more would decline in such a state.
Anarcho-capitalism (no state) is simply untenable. Minarchy (minimal state) however is something that is far more realistic and achieves 90% of the goals of both libertarians and conservatives.
Hardcore libertarians are gammas for the most part - they simply have no understanding of human nature and instead believe the justness of their principles to be able to sustain a society without noticing the current playing field and all the games being played around them.
Take the free market for example - they ignore the fact that a supercartel owns 60% of the world's wealth, so how could there possibly be a free market when there's already a monopoly?
They would gain total direct control over your life in a libertarian state and if anything the globalist elite are promoting libertarianism because then they can simply rule over the serfs with tyranny enforced by their own private military which would dwarf that of any country ever seen before.
Not only that but they ignore completely the long-term effects of a society left to it's own devices. Without a state to enforce taxes the military power of a libertarian country would quickly stagnate and they'd be overrun by any foreign power. Getting people to think long-term isn't in most people's nature so although paying towards a local neighbourhood militia is likely, funding a national-level army is not.
This is without even getting into the ways border defence, healthcare, birth rates, justice and much more would decline in such a state.
Anarcho-capitalism (no state) is simply untenable. Minarchy (minimal state) however is something that is far more realistic and achieves 90% of the goals of both libertarians and conservatives.