[david.garrett84]

This is at a minimum honorary pedophilia. She's tried to take her own non-lactating sexual organ and shove it in an infant's mouth.

If you or I touch that same sexual organ without her consent, it's sexual assault. But if she pops it in its non-lactating state in an infant's mouth, which she fully intended to do, we're not going to call it sexual?

I'm all for recognizing the differences between men and women, but nothing about this is normal.

For all intents and purposes, this is no different from a fat man with manboobs trying to "breastfeed" an infant.

Forget the explanation. These are her hamster words. Focus on the act and what she intended to do.

Meanwhile, guys like this dude are falsely called pedophiles merely for taking selfies for their kids, all because some hag decides to squawk for 15 minutes of attention-whoring: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...ology.html