[911]

(03-03-2017 12:43 PM)Number one bummer Wrote:  

(03-03-2017 12:01 PM)LockeAndLoad Wrote:  

(03-03-2017 11:31 AM)Steve McQueen Wrote:  

(03-03-2017 10:41 AM)LockeAndLoad Wrote:  

(03-03-2017 03:31 AM)Only One Man Wrote:  

If you believe the "official story" of the JFK assassination, you're fucking retarded.

That's an incredibly nuanced, articulate, thought-out analysis. Care to elaborate?

Why dont you just research it mate

There are so many inconsistencies and unanswered questions its obvious that there was a cover up and Oswald was a patsy

If you have an opposing view please state your argument and give us supporting facts, otherwise your just a troll

I didn't say there isn't any conspiracy or cover-up, though I tend to think conspiracy theories usually get way out of hand, mostly by people who look at the movie JFK as a historical record rather than a piece of entertainment. My comment was in response to the terse "you're fucking retarded," which didn't exactly put forth a new argument regarding the matter.

This forum allows the discussion on theories such as collider demons and flat planets, I don't think such a demeaning comment was needed. I think its smart to discuss all theories to prevent people from thinking others are suppressing knowledge for a sinister reason.

That being said, there are several mechanisms I look at when reviewing a conspiracy theory. First I believe in the Axel Oxenstierna quote, "Do you not know, my son, with how little wisdom the world is governed?" There are many people who undersell their own value and intelligence by believing the world is concisely run by much smarter and controlling people. The façade of authority is shallow and most events happen by redundancy or luck. I'm also a fan of Occam's Razor which can be used in my final thought too.

I always try and imagine what I would need to do, to carry out these conspiracies. Most of the conspiracies require a collusion so great between so many people it is simply not possible. People are incentivized to sell out conspiracies and crimes. It also ignores the virtues that most humans have. Just think how many law enforcement, investigators or anyone for that matter could have made their careers by blowing the lid off a JFK conspiracy.

Arguably the most blue-pilled post ever posted on this forum, the old "someone would have blown the whistle" canard...

The media has been in the tank for decades now. Many whistleblowers, including some of the best journalists of their time (like Dorothy Kilgallen) did not live to tell their story, while others who followed the official line or lied about it, like Dan Rather, or politicians involved in the cover-up like Arlen Spector, went on to become household names.

5min tour:

-18 witnesses confirm that the exit wound was in the back of JFK's head, which means he had to be shot from the front:



-Statistical/actuarial analysis of JFK witnesses death rate sets the likelihood of the observed unnatural death rates somewhere around 1 in a trillion. There were 78 unnatural deaths from a pool of 1400 witnesses, when the expected number would be around 17, and those unnatural deaths happen to peak right before/at major inquiry years:



https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/201...o-testify/

https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/201...abilities/