We need money to stay online, if you like the forum, donate! x

rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one. x


is a "slump-buster" really necessary?
#17

is a "slump-buster" really necessary?

Quote: (01-04-2017 03:08 PM)Serious Sam Wrote:  

I second XPQ22. A slump-buster hovers around the 5 range. Going for girls who are 3 and below is dumpster diving, not slump busting.

The slump buster is great for getting a man back in the game. When I got out of a shitty relationship a few years back, I banged a 5 who was a friend of mine, and to this day she's one of the best lays, and the best at sucking dick. Whereas most girls never even get me close to popping off from head, I had to concentrate on basketball stats and even physically stop her on the nights I wanted to fuck.

Hell, she even bought me dinner on a couple of occasions.

So yeah, don't go around plugging warthogs. You won't feel any better afterwards. But if you hit it off with a girl who maybe isn't your top choice looks wise, but you get along and enjoy her company, and she's not ugly or fat, then I say go for it. Shake off the cobwebs and get back in the game.

First, let me just get this out...

[Image: laugh4.gif]

All right, now I'd like to add I think there are 3 scenarios in which it's perfectly acceptable for a man to pick the "low-hanging fruit":

1.) When you're new to game and need experience.

2.) When you've just gotten out of a relationship. Truly, the best way to get over someone is to get on someone else.

3.) To end a dry spell, call it the "Law of Sexual Inertia" -- a body in motion tends to stay in motion, a body at rest tends to stay at rest.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)