[Tim in real life]

(10-10-2016 08:01 AM)RBerkley Wrote:  

The ironic thing is that the Victorian era in England used to be sexually repressed at that time, that men were fleeing England to colonize other countries, which explains that former British law in countries like Jamaica outlaw anal sex even if it between man and woman. Some Caribbean countries even enforce British laws which criminalize vulgar language in public.

So it's bizarre that the Neo-Victorianism permits buggery (LGBTQ+ PEDOPHILE) & vulgar behaviour such as feministes walking naked on the streets or posing naked with little kids for feminist blogs.

Canada overall is one weird dump because in the United States, if someone poses nude in front of a kid, that person gets beaten up, man or woman.

Professor Peterson gotta stash his cash offshore and find an exit route from Toronto if SHTF with those LGBTQ, "breastfeeding" mothers who pose naked for their sons, trannies, faggots, dykes, shit eaters, women who shove dildos up their ass in front of kids, etc Social Justice groups who are calling for his blood for being "intolerant" to trannies who wanna flash their genitals to little kids in the transgender-friendly bathroom

And yet, both renditions of Victorianism has gynocentrism written all over. Yes, British men were fleeing England, either due to false Jack the Ripper accusations, Victorian repression, or "new life" in the colonies.

Both renditions of Victorianism actually give Anglo women excessive sexual power, hence why the term "gay" has since been warped to "I finally get to indulge in sexual lust, regardless of the level of depravity" and includes homosexuality.