[John Michael Kane]

(04-22-2016 01:19 AM)CodyB Wrote:  

Judging by the world's reactions back in February, if you class yourself as RP or a Neo-Masculine you will be not only be made an outcast but also threatened and a target for doxxing and vandalism.

A valid point. At this juncture, a man has two choices:

1. Remove himself from social media and avoid publicly announcing his political views to others, while quietly screening women (and male friends!) for traditional mindsets. Subtlety matters here. Be discrete.
2. The other option is to go full nuclear. Think Donald Trump, but even on a smaller scale. If you build up a private business that is successful enough (doesn't have to be a billion dollars), you have enough money that you don't have to deal with asshole SJW's. Say whatever you want. Think Trump, Milo, Gavin, etc. These men are saying what they want from a position of strength and without apology. As more men get fed up with political correctness, it will become easier to be a "real talker". Just make sure you enough FU money to be insulated from traditional wage slave employment to SJW pandering businesses. If you aren't there yet, revert back to option 1 I posted above.

Quote:

Many of us on this website/community live as minimalists, or even nomads regardless of wealth amassed. Personally, despite owning property, I have an innate fear of permanence in one place and I don't really own much more than I keep fit in my car. Other shit is disposable and holds no true value.

There's nothing wrong with being a minimalist, and owing only what you truly need. That being said, if a family is part of a man's future plans, he needs to have some surplus wealth ideally (or a path toward obtaining it in the future). A wife and kids aren't cheap, but the cost can be greatly minimized by screening for non-materialist women. Women that aren't afraid to cook instead of eat out. Women that can sew, etc.

Quote:

I rent my places out and sleep in a converted room in my factory bay. I live out of a suitcase, even at home.

This is a great way to live below one's means. At some point though if you desire a stable LTR with a girl possibly leading to marriage, a woman will want more of "nest" to call home. That doesn't mean you need something extravagant.

Quote:

I think this way of thinking has led many a man to become ruthless pragmatists. I only live by one ideal; improving my lot in life, be that through wealth, experience or education, and also looking after my immediate relatives. I've given up on politics, or relying on people and it's worked well.

There are no political resolutions available on the immediate horizon regarding the plight of men. Keeping this in mind, it is quite worthless to engage in reading much as it relates to politics. Instead, focusing more on stacking wealth, improving one's health and building up a man's personal tribe of friends and family are far more important. Politics in the current theater are but a distraction from personal growth. Relying on people that share your same mindset, that is certainly worth reconsidering.

Quote:

So in regards to starting a family. With that kind of risk for many people becoming ostracized in their own community just for what they feel or think, it might be hard to live a conspicuous life with the traditional foundations of a home, family etc.

This is why if you choose to start your own family, it has to be located within a larger community that supports your same vision. That may mean geographic relocation, getting involved with a church and other lifestyle choices. This is by no means an easy task, but one worth considering if your End Game is more than just being a lone wolf.