Quote: (03-28-2016 11:27 PM)doodlebug786 Wrote:
Christians do not have 1st class citizen ship in many of the countries reference. I never said they did. I said sharia would implement this if used. No country implements it...the countries are run by elites there is no justice. take Saudi arabia for example, if you are muslim but not a national born saudi you are 2nd class citizen...sharia laws do not apply. Pakistan have no sharia court, forget it. I'm just stating the obvious. Syria is run by a non-muslim (Assad)....there is no sharia there. Anyway what else can I tell you, believe what you want. Why would anyone say it is the fault of islam for something that the west has control over. At least be logical.
So Christians are 2nd class citizens (at best) in many Islamic countries. That neatly answers your question as to why westerners might be concerned when they see Islamic influence growing in their communities and nations.
Saudi Arabia's legal system is based fully on Sharia. Do they often treat certain Muslims badly? Yes they do, but so did the Ottoman Empire, so did the Abbasid Caliphate and plenty of other Islamic governments. It doesn't alter the fact that their legal system is drawn from Sharia.
Pakistan does have a Sharia court with immense legal and political power. The entire reason Pakistan was founded was that a large amount of Muslims in the Indian subcontinent demanded a purely Islamic society and refused to accept secular, pluralistic India. Then, that Islamic society fought a horrifying civil war with itself in 1971 when Bangladesh declared independence. Again, when you ask why westerners don't want growing Islamic influence in their countries, there's another clear answer.