[Dr. Kahn]

We knew each other. Sat together at the lunch tables many times, etc. About 25% of the men in my department always try and chat up every attractive girls in sight. So we've sat with them, talked with them, joked with them, etc several times. I guess all these times those men(in other department) secretly resented us for this. There is a reason those ladies decided to come over and join us rather than just spent the whole evening and night with those white knights/cockblockers. We are simply more fun. However, the whiteknights/cockblockers are clearly more ruthless, their counter-measures was effective(although it didn't result in them getting any pussy)

The ladies were originally with the white knights.

K and D texted the girls. The girls came over to our spot ditching the white knights/cockblockers spot.

The whiteknights/cockblockers must have hated this.

The Whiteknights/cockblockers came with the girls to our spot, and proceeded to make the weed smoking at the Company's sponsored Hilton Hotel a big issue.

The girls got scared and retreated to a different location.

The whiteknights/cockblockers won't tell us the girls new location-- so they ended up being the only ones to join the girls at this new location. It is bitch-made, but machiavellian.


.

(01-28-2016 08:12 PM)Hades Wrote:  

When a bunch of guys move the women elsewhere and don't tell you the new location - that's not white knighting. That's cockblocking. They're trying to increase their chances by making the ratio more favorable, which isn't a bad thing.

If you didn't know these guys you should have tried doing the same thing, excluding a few of them. Now you know they're a bunch of faggots. You can get even.