[tron]

(05-25-2015 08:06 AM)Roosh Wrote:  

This is the short, hilarious version of the full interview:

He should have simply questioned her non-existent right to speak on behalf of black people and shut her down there.
Black women have had the option to make their hair long by braiding since time immemorial.

Having visited several African countries I am aware of the beautiful things black women can do with their hair without the use of chemicals.

Straightening with the use of chemicals and the use of weaves has at some point been a burden placed on black peopled to appear as "civilized" as white people.
However Black american culture and associated trends with straightened hair could also turn this argument around to suggest straightening has been reclaimed to actually represent how comfortable black women are with straitening their hair.

My point is McInnes and the feminist demonstrate they are not remotely qualified to discuss what black women do with their hair.

Secondly most people here are aware (and currently live in) eastern European countries that are in fact not communist and despite their lack of progress they are far more white and racially homogeneous than the US, yet like useful idiots we subserviently champion McInnes flawed logic.

If one in fact looks at an economically successful northern European countries like the UK one would notice it has a similar proportion of whites to the US (albeit a more concentrated as a mix of normans (french) saxons, celts and welsh) rather than in the US where angry whites of Nordic, Germanic, Slavic dutch, latin turkish and Armenians origin can all successfully make applications to the KKK.

However having previously worked in Switzerland (a nation of french, German and Italian speakers) for me dispelled the fallacy that one needs racism homogeneity.

Shared values and a rejection of liberal degeneracy are far more important than the fallacy of racial homogeneity which for me only leads down one path.

The fifth column championing degeneracy in the US is undoubtedly white yet the problem for me is that regardless of useful he might be in the fight against SJW degeneracy, McInnes now indelibly has that stain of harboring racist beliefs.

This might not be fair as I suspect the nature his work and how he earns his living is essentially being a talking head and by inference a useful idiot in propagating the culture wars that play right into the hands of a small global elite to whose platforms you are essentially adding free content.

It may also be worth examining how one is offered a package deal and nothing else. If you oppose racism then you must by the leftist, SJW decree also be a useful idiot and champion gay rights and every other immoral left wing causes.

Likewise those leading the debate against feminists seem to compel their followers to explore the fringes of right wing excess.

I think it is worth examining the reasons why to avoid being useful idiots who pour fuel on a never ending cycle as oppose to achieving the goals we have set forth.