[Hooligan Harry]

Had to share this. WA Today has an article up about some terrorist warning that the USA has issued for all its citizens travelling to Thailand, and in particular Bangkok.

What struck me most though was the picture they used. I almost bust a gut laughing because this one picture has just about summed up what I have seen countless times over the years. Its captured the average western tourist couple perfectly, although the fact that they are so young was what made it so funny. This can be seen everywhere from South American to Eastern Europe to Asia.



There he is, hand in hand with this pale, man like thing who is no doubt also his high maintenance, frigid, strong, independent girlfriend. At least his tranny is thin, which is a rarity for a geeky guy like that. But having this troll on his arm, despite having all those young, exotic, friendly, horny thai girls around him, means he is not one of those loser sex tourists.

What a winner.

[Arado]

(01-15-2012 04:37 AM)Hooligan Harry Wrote:  

There he is, hand in hand with this pale, man like thing who is no doubt also his high maintenance, frigid, strong, independent girlfriend. At least his tranny is thin, which is a rarity for a geeky guy like that. But having this troll on his arm, despite having all those young, exotic, friendly, horny thai girls around him, means he is not one of those loser sex tourists.

What a winner.

Lol the old married guys are the most miserable bunch in Thailand...perhaps only rivaled by their partners, who are upset, knowing what's going through the mind of their husbands.

[MMM]

I'd bet my life she is wearing flip flops. I disagree, she may be "thin" by American standards, but come on, I smell a muffin top cooking. Give her ten years she'll have a full fledged FUPA, two kids and a house and two kids. And so it goes.

[Menace]

Lovely to see a gay couple expressing their mutual affection.

[Alpha]

(01-15-2012 09:28 AM)Menace Wrote:  

Lovely to see a gay couple expressing their mutual affection.

[Lemmo]

The look like Europeans. If they were Americans, there would be a bigger gap in attractiveness between the guy and girl. The girl in the pic is an American 6-7.

[Gmac]

6-7? She's a 4. You can't put an unattractive girl at or above 5.

[Iceinthewater]

holy christ that bitch is ugly. she's like a negative -5.

the gov't is gonna start making up terrorist threats about all the places we want to go to fuck girls. watch.

[Excelsior]

(01-15-2012 12:49 PM)Gmac Wrote:  

6-7? She's a 4. You can't put an unattractive girl at or above 5.

Eh, on an american scale? 5. We have too many fatties here throwing everything off. Just by virtue of not being particularly overweight, she earns a 5.
Not that I like it, but I feel that is what it is.
She's be a 4 or less anywhere else in the Anglosphere where there are fewer landwhales, and lower still in Asia, Latin America or any other part of Europe.

[thegmanifesto]

(01-15-2012 04:37 AM)Hooligan Harry Wrote:  

Had to share this. WA Today has an article up about some terrorist warning that the USA has issued for all its citizens travelling to Thailand, and in particular Bangkok.

What struck me most though was the picture they used. I almost bust a gut laughing because this one picture has just about summed up what I have seen countless times over the years. Its captured the average western tourist couple perfectly, although the fact that they are so young was what made it so funny. This can be seen everywhere from South American to Eastern Europe to Asia.



There he is, hand in hand with this pale, man like thing who is no doubt also his high maintenance, frigid, strong, independent girlfriend. At least his tranny is thin, which is a rarity for a geeky guy like that. But having this troll on his arm, despite having all those young, exotic, friendly, horny thai girls around him, means he is not one of those loser sex tourists.

What a winner.

Yeah, I rate a "Sex Tourist" way higher on the hierarchy scale than a beta slave with an ugly girlfriend.

[Gmac]

(01-15-2012 02:54 PM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  

(01-15-2012 12:49 PM)Gmac Wrote:  

6-7? She's a 4. You can't put an unattractive girl at or above 5.

Eh, on an american scale? 5. We have too many fatties here throwing everything off. Just by virtue of not being particularly overweight, she earns a 5.
Not that I like it, but I feel that is what it is.
She's be a 4 or less anywhere else in the Anglosphere where there are fewer landwhales, and lower still in Asia, Latin America or any other part of Europe.

We have an "American" scale now? Give me a break. Hotness is universal today, and this chick is unattractive.

[[email protected]]

Ugly girlfriend. Clothes are disheveled with no style. Skinny-fat with no muscle tone. Chicks would rate this guy a -5 as well. He gets what he deserves.

I have no pity for guys who settle for these hideous woman beasts. They have only themselves to blame.

[Tuthmosis]

There's no American scale. There's a scale. And, even if there was one, she wouldn't be no 5 on it. The 5, by a reasonably conservative description, can be described as marginally bangable. This isn't close. We have a pretty decent thread that sets this bar. (I'd give the thread a 5, out of 10, actually. It's readable.)

I'd give this girl a 3 because, apart from her padded bra, she is completely unfeminine. She's even unattractive for a man. She's in a weird, nebulous pseudo-gender. She looks retarded. That said, she doesn't appear cross-eyed, morbidly obese, and--for now--we can assume--she has working limbs and sex organs. If she has a serviceable ass, say, you could hit it from behind with a half chub. Plus, she's a ginger, so the fire crotch might help a little. If she has these extras, you might bump it to a 3.5. I don't know if she makes it to 4, though.

[Screwston]

The link doesn't work for me? I thought that ginger was a man at first lol. She looks weird as fuck.

[MMM]

3.5 sounds about right. That is one masculine face it has.

[Soma]

Heh, I see that like 100 times a day in Bangkok - a decently attractive young, Western guy with some hideous thing I wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole on his arm, usually fatter though. Disagree that he's a geek; take off the glasses and he could be mistaken for a surfer, for example. I don't know how those guys can handle being in Thailand and seeing what else is out there. Unless you're going to one of the relatively deserted islands, it's one of the worst places to bring a girl.

(01-15-2012 07:07 AM)MMM Wrote:  

I'd bet my life she is wearing flip flops.

I really disagree with this obsession of not ever wearing flip flops. There's a time and a place for them. Going to the bar in DC is not one of them. When it's 34 degrees C (94 degrees F) like today, or over 40 degrees C (104 degrees F) with humidity factored in, it's absurd to say she shouldn't be wearing some form of sandals. Many people here do.

[Vacancier Permanent]

Damn, that so called girl is fugly! Even 3.5 is way generous! i'd give her a -5 on a 1-10 scale that's how hideous she is!
Poor guy! I saw tons of these kinds of couples when I was living in BKK and each time it would break my heart for the poor guy. What I fail to understand is why do guys allow themselves to sink to such low levels?

[Vacancier Permanent]

Error.

[gringochileno]

I say 4. I might consider hitting it in a slump if I were drunk and I had to put in zero effort (I'd probably have to hit it from behind to avoid killing my boner). Generally I reserve the 3 and below ratings for girls who are obese; being overweight is a much bigger turn-off for me than having an ugly face. It's possible that she would look better in a more flattering photo too.

[Samseau]

But look at how happy he is, guys. Surely that is worth something. After all, you can't put a price on happiness. Don't you wish you could be happy with man-woman by your side?

[WanderingSoul]

I'd rather fuck a ladyboy.

[WanderingSoul]

I take that back. I didn't know she was famous. She played the dude on the right in Boogie Nights.

[Excelsior]

Well, I must have low standards.

A few years in the Ivies will do that to you, I guess.

[thegmanifesto]

(01-15-2012 10:09 PM)Soma Wrote:  

Heh, I see that like 100 times a day in Bangkok - a decently attractive young, Western guy with some hideous thing I wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole on his arm, usually fatter though. Disagree that he's a geek; take off the glasses and he could be mistaken for a surfer, for example. I don't know how those guys can handle being in Thailand and seeing what else is out there. Unless you're going to one of the relatively deserted islands, it's one of the worst places to bring a girl.

(01-15-2012 07:07 AM)MMM Wrote:  

I'd bet my life she is wearing flip flops.

I really disagree with this obsession of not ever wearing flip flops. There's a time and a place for them. Going to the bar in DC is not one of them. When it's 34 degrees C (94 degrees F) like today, or over 40 degrees C (104 degrees F) with humidity factored in, it's absurd to say she shouldn't be wearing some form of sandals. Many people here do.

Just because you wear a Billabong shirt, it doesn't make you a surfer.

I am 100% positive that guy can't surf.

Girls should only be allowed to wear one kind of shoes on the street:

High Heels.

[Tuthmosis]

(01-16-2012 12:53 AM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  

Well, I must have low standards.

A few years in the Ivies will do that to you, I guess.

LOL.

I don't know, my man. I know it varies from campus to campus, but these two girls (which I would regard as pretty middle-of-the-road for the consortium schools) are probably 6s in my book (almost cute, more than bangable).

I know this isn't another rating thread, but it seems pertinent.