rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Would You Rather...
#1

Would You Rather...

1) Be famous or be wealthy?

2) Have Brad Pitt looks or have Roissy-level Game?

3) Grow up poor and learn the secret and wisdom to build wealth, or be born the son of a rich man?

4) Have a one-night stand with the physically perfect woman of your dreams that would otherwise not exist in reality, or have a threesome with two Playboy Models?

5) Be born in this time in history, or choose to be born in your choice in the past?

6) Be born in this time in history, or be born in the future to see what civilization and scientific advancements will occur?

7) Be a genius with modest success with women, or a retard drowning in pussy?

Hello.
Reply
#2

Would You Rather...

Exactly who I am, what I am, right now.
Reply
#3

Would You Rather...

1) Wealthy

2) Game can be learned, so Brad Pitt looks

3) Son of rich guy

4) 3some

5) Probably in the past, would've liked to have been alive when women were actually worth a damn

6) Future, just for shits and giggles

7) Genius
Reply
#4

Would You Rather...

Ah well, just as as a theoretical exercise:

Quote: (11-17-2011 12:31 AM)blurb Wrote:  

1) Be famous or be wealthy?

1) Wealthy.

2) Have Brad Pitt looks or have Roissy-level Game?

2) Brad Pitt looks

3) Grow up poor and learn the secret and wisdom to build wealth, or be born the son of a rich man?

3) Grow up poor

4) Have a one-night stand with the physically perfect woman of your dreams that would otherwise not exist in reality, or have a threesome with two Playboy Models?

4) One-night stand

5) Be born in this time in history, or choose to be born in your choice in the past?

5) Hard to say. Shit.

6) Be born in this time in history, or be born in the future to see what civilization and scientific advancements will occur?

6) Again hard to say.

7) Be a genius with modest success with women, or a retard drowning in pussy?

7) Genius.
But this last one is a "happiness is all you need" fallacy. In reality, the genius doesn't have any success with women at all, let alone "modest". Like in American Beauty, where the guy drops his unfulfilling well-paid career to "live life", but doesn't ever have any financial problems and still sleeps in a villa.

All in all, I would change some things from the past if I could, but I'm happy with how I am right now.

"Imagine" by HCE | Hitler reacts to Battle of Montreal | An alternative use for squid that has never crossed your mind before
Reply
#5

Would You Rather...


  1. wealthy
  2. Roissy Level Game
  3. Wisdom so I can retain my wealth.
  4. Threesome because my perfect woman is based on reality (physically, anyway), and thus she must exist. Its much more likely that I'll find her than it is I'll score a threesome with two playboy models.
  5. Keeping my skillset and worldview I have now, I'd like to be born in 1900, so I'm in my 20's and 30s in the 20s and 30s.
  6. this time in history
  7. Genius.
Reply
#6

Would You Rather...

Quote: (11-17-2011 06:12 AM)Amour Fou Wrote:  

Exactly who I am, what I am, right now.

Diddo!

My life is fucking awesome!


Mixx
Reply
#7

Would You Rather...

Wealthy
Brad Pitt looks (game can be learned, jaw lines cant)
Grow up poor (assuming you're guaranteed to learn the secret)
Threesome, better story
Born the past
Born in the present (I dont see much good in the future)
Idiot drowning in pussy

Chef In Jeans
A culinary website for men
Reply
#8

Would You Rather...

Wealthy. It can manipulated to become famous.
Brad Pitt. As above, game can be learned.
Poor. See how the other side lives, become exposed to the world.
Menage e trois.
Born now.
Born now.
Genius. Like with the other question, eventually you can learn how to get better at success.
Reply
#9

Would You Rather...

Quote: (11-17-2011 12:31 AM)blurb Wrote:  

1) Be famous or be wealthy?

2) Have Brad Pitt looks or have Roissy-level Game?

3) Grow up poor and learn the secret and wisdom to build wealth, or be born the son of a rich man?

4) Have a one-night stand with the physically perfect woman of your dreams that would otherwise not exist in reality, or have a threesome with two Playboy Models?

5) Be born in this time in history, or choose to be born in your choice in the past?

6) Be born in this time in history, or be born in the future to see what civilization and scientific advancements will occur?

7) Be a genius with modest success with women, or a retard drowning in pussy?

Great thread.

1) Tough, but I picked fame. Aside from the fact that being famous means you're usually rich, people (and people includes girls), love the famous man. On the reverse end, I know tons of guys with lots of money who get no pussy.

2) Brad Pitt's Looks + 1-2 years of wall-to-wall approaches and studying on game and female psychology = a guy who gets the type of girls that Roissy can only dream of.

3) Grow up poor and become wealthy. It'll make you tough, while most rich kids I know are soft.

4) Two Playboy models; you don't get in Playboy if you're anything less than an 8 (or famous), and I haven't had a threesome before.

5) Choose: I'd probably pick a few years before my dad was born (1945) so I could be in my late 20's in the 1960's. 1933-1936; for the most part missing the Depression, too young to fight in the War, but just old enough to be entering my prime just in time for the sluts of the women's lib movement.

6) Here and now; how do we know what the future holds? In 50 years North America could be more prosperous than ever or it could be rubble.

7) Genius...because then I can learn game and also live off my talents.


Here are three of my own:

Would you rather...

1) Be 7 feet tall or be 5'2?

(When I was 5, the doctor told my parents I'd be between 6'2 and 6'5, and I grew to 6'3. Hopefully if some guy tells my parents that I'll be between 6'9 and 7'2 they immediately put a basketball in my hands. Short guys with game can get laid, but to a certain point; the 5'8 guy with game will still get pussy, but 5'2? That's short even for women).

2) Work 40 hours a week for $45,000 per year, or 80 hours a week for $120,000 per year?

(45k is 900 a week and 120k is about 2350. Money is nice, but 80 hours? That's a lot of work and a lot of dealing with people's bullshit for nicer stuff.)

3) Be ugly but have a 9 inch dick, or be very attractive with a 4-inch dick?

(Even if this black lizard I know once told me this hot guy and her were about to fuck and he whipped it out tiny and she said "Oh Hell no!" and shut it down, I'd still prefer the looks + minimal hammer.)
Reply
#10

Would You Rather...

Quote:Quote:

1) Be 7 feet tall or be 5'2?

I'd rather be 7 feet tall. Tall people get immediately noticed; short people are more easily forgotten.

Quote:Quote:

2) Work 40 hours a week for $45,000 per year, or 80 hours a week for $120,000 per year?

I would work at the 80 hour job for one year, quit, and have $120,000 in the bank. For instance, let's say that you live with your parents. That means you pay no rent, food is cooked, and all you have to do is get up and go to work. Now, imagine having over $100,000 in the bank with no debt. That's life-changing money. One could easily live off of that money for a good number of years. I say one year of hard work equals at the very minimum five years of leisure.

Let's take $120,000 and see how far living abroad can get you.

If I am correct in remembering that Roosh's cost of living in Poland was around $2,000 per month, then one year's cost of living in Poland equals about $24,000. With that being said, you could live off of your pile of hard-earned cash for about 5 years. In some other cheaper places, I'm sure you could live off of that money much longer. I've heard that SEA is cheaper.



Quote:Quote:

3) Be ugly but have a 9 inch dick, or be very attractive with a 4-inch dick?

I pick the second option with being more attractive.

Good looks are more easily noticed than large dicks.

Hello.
Reply
#11

Would You Rather...

Quote: (11-20-2011 02:12 AM)blurb Wrote:  

Quote:Quote:

1) Be 7 feet tall or be 5'2?

I'd rather be 7 feet tall. Tall people get immediately noticed; short people are more easily forgotten.

Interesting. To me, like age and weight and cup size, there is a 'sweet spot' for height that has the most appeal (I'd say it's between 5'11 and 6'4 for men). I worked with a guy once who was 6'9.5 (the height difference he had on me is about the same as the one I have on most people), and he never got any pussy. If you're above 6'6, you better know how to ball.

Quote:Quote:

2) Work 40 hours a week for $45,000 per year, or 80 hours a week for $120,000 per year?

I would work at the 80 hour job for one year, quit, and have $120,000 in the bank. For instance, let's say that you live with your parents. That means you pay no rent, food is cooked, and all you have to do is get up and go to work. Now, imagine having over $100,000 in the bank with no debt. That's life-changing money. One could easily live off of that money for a good number of years. I say one year of hard work equals at the very minimum five years of leisure.

Let's take $120,000 and see how far living abroad can get you.

If I am correct in remembering that Roosh's cost of living in Poland was around $2,000 per month, then one year's cost of living in Poland equals about $24,000. With that being said, you could live off of your pile of hard-earned cash for about 5 years. In some other cheaper places, I'm sure you could live off of that money much longer. I've heard that SEA is cheaper.

120 in the bank wouldn't work. Taxes, 120k is I believe 29% in the USA, so that's a take-home of about 85,200, then assume about $900 a month rent, that's 10,800 off, groceries $40 a week ($2040), if you have a car you might pay $80 a month for insurance ($960) and $30 a week for gas ($1530).

That's already down to $69870, just with essential expenses (I didn't factor anything like student loan debt, going out or cable/internet/phone). At the absolute most, after all of that you could fork away maybe $50,000.

I just wouldn't want it because there'd be no freedom, and you can make a decent enough living on $900 a week.
Reply
#12

Would You Rather...

This thread is all good fun. Would you rather:

Live in a place with 0% overweight/obese women, but the hottest a girl could get was a 7?

Or...

Live in a place where 85% of the female population is overweight/obese, but the remaining 15% are all 8's and 9's?


In the former, you could probably get a lot of sex with okay-to-decent girls with minimal effort, while in the latter you'd need to have advanced game, but you'd be fucking models and beauty queens.

I'd say I'll take the first one (no fat chicks). Sure it'd be good to fuck a really attractive chick, but just how much bullshit would you have to put up with to get a notch? 85% overweight means cockblocking will be at pandemic proportions, and just 15% attractive means that female entitlement and flaking will be at pandemic proportions, saying nothing of the fact that likely 100% of men will be going for that 15%.
Reply
#13

Would You Rather...

1) Famous.

2) Model looks. Because game only works if you already have the looks. (By the way I strongly doubt that Roissy has proper game at all. He is a talented writer, but not an infield-game guru.)

3) Son of a rich man.

4) Threesome. I have my standards, though I don't idolize female beauty.

5) Born in the 19th century Victorian England.

6) Born this time in history, because it will get worse in the future.

7) Retard drowning in pussy. Anybody here saying that "a genius could learn game" oversee that most likely a genius would not at all be interested into game/women.
A genius is most likely to focus on his scientific/artistic achievements and go into the brothel once a while (like Beethoven did, for example). Why should he waste his valueable time for chasing drunken bitchez in nightclubs? He has better things to do.
Reply
#14

Would You Rather...

I'd rather have it all
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)