Quote: (12-24-2013 04:35 PM)buja Wrote:
JayJuanGee,
Just to let you know where I am coming from…
I was an engineering major and am a member of three academic honor societies. So I am not someone who is not "college material".
Buja:
I appreciate your point by point response, and I accept that many of your points are valid.
I did get the sense, however, that overall, you are denigrating the value of having a college degree, and you are continuing to defend that position and you provide pretty good examples regarding how, sometimes, experiences will beat out a college degree. But, I maintain that getting head without college to be the exception rather than the rule, and generally, guys should be shooting for some college education if he wants to get ahead in society.
Certainly, I do NOT come from a family of college elitists, and had I NOT attended college, I would have NOT recognized the sick disparities between college educated guys and non-college educated guys in terms of advantages that college educated guys receive – both tangible in terms of actual training and intangible in terms of merely having that certification.
Maybe you and I are NOT that far apart in recognizing the reality of that fact that guys get ahead with college education – because even with your examples of non-college educated guys getting ahead, you recognize that there tends to be a lot of social pressure to keep that non-college educated guy from staying ahead because the tendency is for the college educated people to get the authoritative slots and want to keep them and want to prevent non college educated guys from having those slots – no matter what is the profession.
Your various arguments about college education being harder to get today and that it is less valuable today seem to be in tension with one another. Anyhow, surely I agree with you that college education is harder to get and more elitist and regular guys are priced out of the market, and in that regard, if guys are dissuaded from going to college, then those guys are going to be disadvantaged more in the future because the college education will, in part, be a sign that a guy comes from the “deserving” class.
These societal preferences for college educated people and the placement of college educated people into authoritative positions is NOT going away in the future, even though you are going to be able to find examples in which non-college educated people get ahead – those examples of non college educated people getting ahead are going to continue (and possibly even increasingly) be the exception rather than the rule.
The good ole boys club is a fairly narrow group of people who are increasingly of the very wealthy and college educated, and for any guy to make any semblance in attempting to fit into that crowd or to sway that crowd to get your way with them, in my opinion, a guy also needs to have college education (both the practical and the certificate)… and the tools that are provided by going through such college rigamarole.
Quote: (12-24-2013 04:35 PM)buja Wrote:
Getting a "formal education" in liberal arts is getting less and less valuable as time goes on...especially if it accompanied by student loan debt. Even the mainstream media can't ignore this fact anymore. Again, it's an industrial age paradigm.
I think that you are being too practical, here. Surely, mathematics, engineering and science can be very valuable on a practical level, but it may NOT even matter too much about what a guy learns, as long as he networks and goes to the right schools. The degree is sort of like telegraphing that a guy is worthy of promotion and/or opportunity – and moreso in a world with 15% unemployment rate – most of those guys unemployed either did NOT go to college or went to an unrecognized college.
Quote: (12-24-2013 04:35 PM)buja Wrote:
If the technical guys are screwed by "liberal arts guys", then they'll soon be out of business or out a job.
Technical guys are very frequently getting screwed by liberal arts guys – unless the technical guy works politics and networking and can maneuver through obstacles beyond the narrowness of his technical training. Sure these guys can be very smart, but may also get run over if he tries to get ahead merely by being technically competent.
Quote: (12-24-2013 04:35 PM)buja Wrote:
I believe all learning has value. However, it is not necessary to use archaic and overpriced methods to learn. I'm glad you learned what you learned...you could have learned those skills without a "formal education".
I kind of doubt that I would have known what to focus upon without formal education at a higher level.
Since I do NOT have a well-to-do backgroune, I have NOT had the priviledge of a LOT of prep courses as I was growing up; however, there have been a few occasions, that I was forced into various prep courses, and then after the fact, I realized the various benefits of these prep courses that these rich kids who had been taking these prep courses were waAAAaay advantaged over me, and I had been learning the HARD way (which is NOT always better). My point is that rich kids taking prep courses are so priviledged, that we do NOT even realize what we do NOT know until we get some of those same opportunities, and I am NOT saying that I had a lot of those rich kid opportunies, but I have been exposed to enough of those rich kid opportunities to know that various kinds of formal education and direction can definitely direct guys to learn much better than ad libbing his learning by wandering around the library without direction (even when he thinks he has direction and even when he thinks he is being efficient and learning more than the book learners). The school of hard knocks does NOT always help to get the guy ahead when some professor can point the guy in the right direction – so long as he listens to the professor.
Quote: (12-24-2013 04:35 PM)buja Wrote:
I disagree that any form of "higher education" teaches you "how to learn". To learn skills that really make a difference in the world, they must be performed not studied.
I can study bicycles and learn all about them but that does not mean I can ride a bike.
Taking a music appreciation class does not make one a musician.
I agree with you that book learning may NOT assist if it is NOT put to practice; however, I would NOT argue that formal education precludes putting to practice the book learning. Even when it appears that college courses do NOT have practicality, the good colleges will attempt to force a certain level of application along with the book learning… and then when a guy gets out of college, he can apply what he learned in the books, even more. Guys are only given these opportunies to apply to practice, after getting the degree in the first place.
Quote: (12-24-2013 04:35 PM)buja Wrote:
Formal education has a high opportunity cost in today's fast moving society...not to mention the unreasonably high cost of tuition and books.
A college degree does not guarantee a good salary, lifetime employment, and a nice pension like it used to.
Agreed that there are high costs, but college degree is still needed to get ahead.
Quote: (12-24-2013 04:35 PM)buja Wrote:
If someone likes to go to college and take classes (which I enjoyed too), that's fine.
But if they consider themselves more intelligent or more capable than someone simply because they spent more time in classrooms...they are deluding themselves.
There are assholes everywhere, and sometimes people try to lord their certificates over you; however, if the guy has received the position of authority because of the certificate, and he is recognized for having the position of authority, then even if his subordinates are smarter than he is, the smarter subbordinates still have to jump when the dumb ass educated superior says jump, even though the superior may be a dumb ass. The ways of the world includes formal education, and denigrating formal education as UNNECESSARY is NOT going to be the road to recognizing what is likely necessary for most guys to get ahead.
Quote: (12-24-2013 05:22 PM)jimukr104 Wrote:
And yes most liberal art degrees someone can learn the same stuff reading a lot..its called self education. In fact there are even degrees now that one can get that way. I actually had some credits that were self learned(includes all my FEMA /counter terrorism studies)
I DON'T think anyone is saying that self-education is NOT possible, and probably there is a time and place for such self-education. However, if we try to rely too much on SELF education, either we are going to lose our focus or we are NOT going to get the credentials that are NEEDED to get our foot in the appropriate doors.